Assessing surface heat fluxes in atmospheric reanalyses with a decade of data from the NOAA Kuroshio Extension Observatory

Zhang, D. X.; Cronin, M. F.; Wen, C. H.; Xue, Y.; Kumar, A.; McClurg, D.

doi:10.1002/2016jc011905

Back to Previous Page

Assessing surface heat fluxes in atmospheric reanalyses with a decade of data from the NOAA Kuroshio Extension Observatory

2016

By Zhang, D. X. ; Cronin, M. F. ; Wen, C. H. ; ...

Source: Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 121(9), 6874-6890.

[PDF-8.27 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document

This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed

Details Related Documents You May Also Like

Personal Author:

Zhang, D. X. ; Cronin, M. F. ; Wen, C. H. ; Xue, Y. ; Kumar, A. ; ... More +

NOAA Program & Office:

OAR (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research) ; NWS (National Weather Service) ; PMEL (Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory) ; JISAO (Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean) ; NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction) ; ... More +

Description:

Previous studies have found large biases and uncertainties in the air-sea fluxes from Numerical Weather Prediction model reanalyses, which must be identified and reduced in order to make progress on weather and climate predictions. Here air-sea heat fluxes from NOAA Kuroshio Extension Observatory (KEO) measurements are used to assess two new reanalyses, NCEP's Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) and ECMWF Reanalysis-Interim (ERA-I), suggesting that these two new generation reanalyses have significantly improved. In both reanalyses, all four flux components (sensible and latent heat flux and net longwave and shortwave radiation) are highly correlated with observation, with the correlation of total net surface heat fluxes above 0.96. Although errors of the net surface heat flux have significantly reduced from previous reanalyses, the Root Mean Square Errors (RMSEs) and biases remain high especially for CFSR: the RMSEs of CFSR and ERA-I are reduced by 25-30% to 64 and 61 W/m(2), respectively, while biases are reduced by 40-60% to 28 and 20 W/m(2). But CFSR overestimates the winter heat release by 90 W/m(2). The main cause of biases is the latent heat flux, while RMS errors are primarily due to latent heat flux and shortwave radiation errors. Both reanalyses overestimate the wind speed associated with winter storms and underestimate specific humidity in summer. The ERA-I latent heat flux and its total net surface heat flux are however closer to observation. It is the bulk algorithm in CFSR that is found to be mainly responsible for overestimates of winter heat release in CFSR.

Source:

Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans, 121(9), 6874-6890.

DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016jc011905

Document Type:

Journal Article ;

Rights Information:

Other

Main Document Checksum:

[+]

File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Assessing surface heat fluxes in atmospheric reanalyses with a decade of data from the NOAA Kuroshio Extension Observatory

Details:

Supporting Files

Related Documents

You May Also Like