U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
Official websites use .gov

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

i

Marginal costs of water savings from cooling system retrofits: a case study for Texas power plants



Details

  • Alternative Title:
    Marginal costs of water savings from cooling system retrofits: a case study for Texas power plants
  • Journal Title:
    Environmental Research Letters
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    The water demands of power plant cooling systems may strain water supply and make power generation vulnerable to water scarcity. Cooling systems range in their rates of water use, capital investment, and annual costs. Using Texas as a case study, we examined the cost of retrofitting existing coal and natural gas combined-cycle (NGCC) power plants with alternative cooling systems, either wet recirculating towers or air-cooled condensers for dry cooling. Weapplied a power plant assessment tool to model existing power plants in terms of their key plant attributes and site-specific meteorological conditions and then estimated operation characteristics of retrofitted plants and retrofit costs. Wedetermined the anticipated annual reductions in water withdrawals and the costper- gallon of water saved by retrofits in both deterministic and probabilistic forms. The results demonstrate that replacing once-through cooling at coal-fired power plants with wet recirculating towers has the lowest cost per reduced water withdrawals, on average. The average marginal cost of water withdrawal savings for dry-cooling retrofits at coal-fired plants is approximately 0.68 cents per gallon, while the marginal recirculating retrofit cost is 0.008 cents per gallon. ForNGCCplants, the average marginal costs of water withdrawal savings for dry-cooling and recirculating towers are 1.78 and 0.037 cents per gallon, respectively.
  • Source:
    Environ. Res. Lett. 11 104004
  • DOI:
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Rights Information:
    CC BY
  • Compliance:
    PMC
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.84 MB]
  • Collection(s):
  • Main Document Checksum:
    urn:sha-512:fa99a38a74d4778b6fc02e1780966d6a06cda33840640c9e7e01af158d5944da8eb457e404836ae4c849b96d70712e51f1f012f38eef1dfb28cd667095621222
ON THIS PAGE
 Found an issue?
Send us an email at:
The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.