Good Practices for estimating and using length-at-age in integrated stock assessments
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Good Practices for estimating and using length-at-age in integrated stock assessments

Filetype[PDF-1.82 MB]



Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Fisheries Research
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Estimating growth (increase in size with age) is an integral component of fish population assessment. The use of integrated assessment models combined with the influence of misfitting size composition data on results have led to renewed interest in how growth is modeled in the assessment process. The types of data available to describe the growth process control how the length-at-age relationship will be estimated. Many factors contribute to the complexity of estimating length-at-age, including multiple sources of biological variability and difficulties in getting representative samples. The growth process in the population dynamics model is linked to all other processes and data but most directly influences the assessment model through 1) converting numbers into weight and vice versa, 2) productivity, and 3) modifying fits of size composition data. In some cases, an assessment may be insensitive to moderate levels of misspecification of the growth process, and therefore, relatively simple treatments may be adequate. However, in many cases, especially those where the fit of size composition is influential in estimating scale, a more thorough treatment of the growth process is needed. A complete treatment of growth will estimate the most important forms of biological variability, including individual, sex-specific, temporal, and spatial variability. Several types of sampling bias, including selectivity, length-stratified sampling, and spatial and measurement error, will likely also need to be addressed. When sufficient data are available, assessment authors should consider estimating the growth process as part of the integrated assessment model or consider empirical approaches for situations with high biological variability and sampling bias.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Fisheries Research 270 (2024) 106883
  • DOI:
  • Format:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Accepted Manuscript
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1