The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners.
As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i
To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear-driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
-
2018
-
-
Source: Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan; 8(2): 1384–1398.
[PDF-1.05 MB]
Details:
-
Alternative Title:To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear-driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
-
Journal Title:Ecology and Evolution
-
Personal Author:
-
NOAA Program & Office:
-
Description:In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual-based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state-dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative-to-baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non-lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk-averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors.
-
Keywords:
-
Source:Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan; 8(2): 1384–1398.
-
DOI:
-
Pubmed Central ID:PMC5773337
-
Document Type:
-
Place as Subject:
-
Rights Information:CC BY
-
Compliance:PMC
-
Main Document Checksum:
-
Download URL:
-
File Type:
