| Neshaminy Creek : Nonpoint pollution and wetlands study - :1860 | National Ocean Service (NOS)
Stacks Logo
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.
 
 
Help
Clear All Simple Search
Advanced Search
Neshaminy Creek : Nonpoint pollution and wetlands study
  • Published Date:
    1994
Filetype[PDF-4.58 MB]


No Related Documents.
You May Also Like:
  1. Watershed restoration : a guide for citizen involvement in California
    Corporate Author:
    William M. Kier Associates. United States, NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Office,.
    Published:
    1995
    Series:
    NOAA Coastal Ocean Program decision analysis series ; no. 8
    Description:
    "This document has been created to guide and suppost every person in the community, from homemaker to elected official, who wants her or his watershed to provide clean water, harvestable fish resources and other proof that life in the watershed can n...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.34 MB]
  2. State of Ilinois coastal nonpoint pollution control program : final programmatic environmental assessment
    Personal Author:
    Feldman, Rebecca L.; Callender, Russell; Nedelka, Patmarie S.;
    Corporate Author:
    United States, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration., Office of General Counsel,. United States, Office for Coastal Management,.
    Published:
    2016
    Description:
    In this programmatic environmental assessment (PEA), the action is the review of the Illinois coastal nonpoint program to determine whether the program satisfies the statutory mandates of section 6217 and provides for implementation of management mea...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 2.31 MB]
  3. Restoration plan and environmental assessment, Portage Creek and Operable Unit 1 : Allied Paper Property, Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
    Personal Author:
    Sutter, Frederick C.
    Corporate Author:
    Michigan, Department of Natural Resources,. Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality,. Michigan, Department of Attorney General,. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. United States, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,. Stratus Consulting. United States, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration., Office of Program Planning and Integration,.
    Published:
    2013
    Description:
    "This Restoration Plan/Environmental Assessment (RP/EA) presents proposed restoration actions to address public natural resource losses caused by the release of hazardous substances from the Allied Paper Property (Operable Unit 1, OU1) at the Allied ...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 4.56 MB]
  4. Georgia Coastal Nonpoint Pollution Control Program Analysis of Full Approval Decision
    Personal Author:
    LeBoeuf, Nicole
    Corporate Author:
    United States, Office for Coastal Management,. United States, Environmental Protection Agency., Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds,.
    Published:
    2018
    Description:
    "In 1990, Congress enacted Section 6217 of the Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments (CZARA), entitled 'Protecting Coastal Waters' to help address the problem of non point source pollution and its effect on coastal waters. Section 6217, jointly...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 1.87 MB]
  5. Evaluation of the Economic Costs and Benefits of Methods for Reducing Nutrient Loads to the Gulf of Mexico: Topic 6 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico
    Personal Author:
    Doering, Otto C. (Otto Charles), 1940-; Diaz-Hermelo, Francisco; Howard, Crystal; Heimlich, Ralph E.; Hitzhusen, Fredrick J.; Kazmierczak, Richard F.; Lee, John; Libby, Larry; Milon, Walter; Prato, Tony; Ribaudo, Marc;
    Corporate Author:
    United States. National Ocean Service. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program (U.S.).
    Published:
    1999
    Series:
    NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series ; No. 20
    Description:
    In this report we analyze the Topic 5 report's recommendations for reducing nitrogen losses to the Gulf of Mexico (Mitsch et al. 1999). We indicate the relative costs and cost-effectiveness of different control measures, and potential benefits within...
    File Type:
    Filetype[PDF - 9.76 MB]