Evaluating the Performance of Microphysics Schemes against Observations during High-Impact Lake-Effect Snow Events

Details

• Journal Title:
  Weather and Forecasting
• Personal Author:
  Hutson, Abby ; Pettersen, Claire ; Fujisaki-Manome, Ayumi ; Mann, Gregg E. ; Nesbitt, Stephen W. ; Kulie, Mark S.
• NOAA Program & Office:
  NWS (National Weather Service) ; CR (Central Region) ; OAR (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research) ; GSL (Global Systems Laboratory) ; NESDIS (National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service) ; STAR (Center for Satellite Applications and Research) ; CIGLR (Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research)
• Description:
  In the Great Lakes region (GLR), lake-effect snow (LeS) events are a common occurrence, in which narrow, intense bands of convection cause snowfall downwind of the lakes. The shallow convection associated with LeS is dynamically different from deeper, synoptically driven snow, and the particle size distributions (PSDs) of the precipitation have different shapes, as well. This work considers whether or not the Thompson–Eidhammer microphysics scheme, which includes single-moment prediction of snow, is accurate in estimating the PSDs of LeS convection. The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) configuration of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model is used to simulate three different LeS events in the GLR using two different microphysics schemes: the Thompson–Eidhammer “aerosol-aware” scheme and the Morrison double-moment scheme. Model-estimated PSDs are calculated and compared to observed PSDs at three locations in the region: Marquette, Michigan; Gaylord, Michigan; and Buffalo, New York. Model-predicted liquid water equivalent snowfall and snow density are also compared to observed products. It is found that parameterization performance varies depending on location, with Thompson struggling to create the correct PSD shape for Marquette. Both microphysics schemes do not perform well in predicting particles greater than 6 mm in diameter except in Buffalo, where both simulated and observed PSDs contain snow particles greater than 10 mm in diameter.
• Keywords:
  Radar Snowfall Drop-size Distribution Lake Effects Model Evaluation Model Performance Parameterization
• Source:
  Wea. Forecasting, 40, 2273–2292
• DOI:
  https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-24-0249.1
• Format:
  PDF
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• Funding:
  Grant no. NA21OAR4590367 ; Grant no. NA22OAR4320150
• Rights Information:
  Other
• Compliance:
  Submitted
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:f551fbb88ad2ccf191161e9f26d8dd9befc29ba026d17cab05378612681eed33810625d64a0c09e865c716700bbeb7fe3912c1813ec1564594d08b727cd92429
• File Type: