Details:

Journal Title:
Journal of Geodesy
Personal Author:
Wang, Y. M. ; Becker, C. ; Mader, G. ; Martin, D. ; Li, X. ; ... More +
Wang, Y. M. ; Becker, C. ; Mader, G. ; Martin, D. ; Li, X. ; Jiang, T. ; Breidenbach, S. ; Geoghegan, C. ; Winester, D. ; Guillaume, S. ; Bürki, B. Less -
NOAA Program & Office:
NOS (National Ocean Service) ; NGS (Office of National Geodetic Survey)
NOS (National Ocean Service) ; NGS (Office of National Geodetic Survey) Less -
Description:
Three Geoid Slope Validation Surveys were planned by the National Geodetic Survey for validating geoid improvement gained by incorporating airborne gravity data collected by the “Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum” (GRAV-D) project in flat, medium and rough topographic areas, respectively. The first survey GSVS11 over a flat topographic area in Texas confirmed that a 1-cm differential accuracy geoid over baseline lengths between 0.4 and 320 km is achievable with GRAV-D data included (Smith et al. in J Geod 87:885–907, 2013). The second survey, Geoid Slope Validation Survey 2014 (GSVS14) took place in Iowa in an area with moderate topography but significant gravity variation. Two sets of geoidal heights were computed from GPS/leveling data and observed astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical at 204 GSVS14 official marks. They agree with each other at a ±1.2cm level, which attests to the high quality of the GSVS14 data. In total, four geoid models were computed. Three models combined the GOCO03/5S satellite gravity model with terrestrial and GRAV-D gravity with different strategies. The fourth model, called xGEOID15A, had no airborne gravity data and served as the benchmark to quantify the contribution of GRAV-D to the geoid improvement. The comparisons show that each model agrees with the GPS/leveling geoid height by 1.5 cm in mark-by-mark comparisons. In differential comparisons, all geoid models have a predicted accuracy of 1–2 cm at baseline lengths from 1.6 to 247 km. The contribution of GRAV-D is not apparent due to a 9-cm slope in the western 50-km section of the traverse for all gravimetric geoid models, and it was determined that the slopes have been caused by a 5 mGal bias in the terrestrial gravity data. If that western 50-km section of the testing line is excluded in the comparisons, then the improvement with GRAV-D is clearly evident. In that case, 1-cm differential accuracy on baselines of any length is achieved with the GRAV-D-enhanced geoid models and exhibits a clear improvement over the geoid models without GRAV-D data. GSVS14 confirmed that the geoid differential accuracies are in the 1–2 cm range at various baseline lengths. The accuracy increases to 1 cm with GRAV-D gravity when the west 50 km line is not included. The data collected by the surveys have high accuracy and have the potential to be used for validation of other geodetic techniques, e.g., the chronometric leveling. To reach the 1-cm height differences of the GSVS data, a clock with frequency accuracy of 10−18is required. Using the GSVS data, the accuracy of ellipsoidal height differences can also be estimated.
Keywords:
[+]
Computers In Earth Sciences Geochemistry And Petrology Geophysics
Source:
Journal of Geodesy, 91(10), 1261-1276
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1022-1
ISSN:
0949-7714;1432-1394;
Format:
PDF
Publisher:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Document Type:
Journal Article
Rights Information:
Accepted Manuscript
Compliance:
Submitted
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:a56056b35ed96465706e6f4925722d73edc8f2192f06c5cdec728a085cf63f6f
Download URL:
https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/51155/noaa_51155_DS1.pdf
File Type:

Supporting Files

• No Additional Files

More +