• Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2019 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/7yyb-8d86 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2019). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response. https://doi.org/10.25923/7yyb-8d86 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response" (2019), https://doi.org/10.25923/7yyb-8d86 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response" , 2019, https://doi.org/10.25923/7yyb-8d86 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 2.10 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2019 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2018-00335 No Description File Type: [PDF - 2.10 MB] File Type: [PDF - 2.10 MB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations City of Roseville Widening of Westbound On-Ramp 80_I80 Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations City of Roseville Widening of Westbound On-Ramp 80_I80 Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2020 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/s8xj-4116 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2020). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations City of Roseville Widening of Westbound On-Ramp 80_I80. https://doi.org/10.25923/s8xj-4116 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations City of Roseville Widening of Westbound On-Ramp 80_I80" (2020), https://doi.org/10.25923/s8xj-4116 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations City of Roseville Widening of Westbound On-Ramp 80_I80" , 2020, https://doi.org/10.25923/s8xj-4116 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 482.88 KB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2020 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2020-00126 No Description File Type: [PDF - 482.88 KB] File Type: [PDF - 482.88 KB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response McKenzie- Beverly and McKenzie- Leavenworth Transmission Lines Project Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response McKenzie- Beverly and McKenzie- Leavenworth Transmission Lines Project Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2020 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/792p-h710 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2020). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response McKenzie- Beverly and McKenzie- Leavenworth Transmission Lines Project. https://doi.org/10.25923/792p-h710 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response McKenzie- Beverly and McKenzie- Leavenworth Transmission Lines Project" (2020), https://doi.org/10.25923/792p-h710 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response McKenzie- Beverly and McKenzie- Leavenworth Transmission Lines Project" , 2020, https://doi.org/10.25923/792p-h710 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 1.45 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2020 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-02035 No Description File Type: [PDF - 1.45 MB] File Type: [PDF - 1.45 MB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response City of Pendleton, Oregon McKay Creek Sediment Removal Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response City of Pendleton, Oregon McKay Creek Sediment Removal Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2020 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/ma41-ah51 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2020). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response City of Pendleton, Oregon McKay Creek Sediment Removal. https://doi.org/10.25923/ma41-ah51 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response City of Pendleton, Oregon McKay Creek Sediment Removal" (2020), https://doi.org/10.25923/ma41-ah51 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response City of Pendleton, Oregon McKay Creek Sediment Removal" , 2020, https://doi.org/10.25923/ma41-ah51 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 968.56 KB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2020 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-03620 No Description File Type: [PDF - 968.56 KB] File Type: [PDF - 968.56 KB] Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2020 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/rjrh-ya12 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2020). Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation. https://doi.org/10.25923/rjrh-ya12 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation" (2020), https://doi.org/10.25923/rjrh-ya12 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation" , 2020, https://doi.org/10.25923/rjrh-ya12 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 828.48 KB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2020 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-03979 No Description File Type: [PDF - 828.48 KB] File Type: [PDF - 828.48 KB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the SR 241 Mabton Bridges Project Yakima County, Washington Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the SR 241 Mabton Bridges Project Yakima County, Washington Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2019 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/0jdr-gz03 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2019). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the SR 241 Mabton Bridges Project Yakima County, Washington. https://doi.org/10.25923/0jdr-gz03 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the SR 241 Mabton Bridges Project Yakima County, Washington" (2019), https://doi.org/10.25923/0jdr-gz03 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the SR 241 Mabton Bridges Project Yakima County, Washington" , 2019, https://doi.org/10.25923/0jdr-gz03 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 1.96 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2019 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-00076 No Description File Type: [PDF - 1.96 MB] File Type: [PDF - 1.96 MB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project, Phase 3-4, Stampede Pass to Easton; (HUCs 170300010304 Stampede Creek-Yakima River; 170300010306 Little Creek-Yakima River Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project, Phase 3-4, Stampede Pass to Easton; (HUCs 170300010304 Stampede Creek-Yakima River; 170300010306 Little Creek-Yakima River Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2019 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/dfz3-5517 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2019). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project, Phase 3-4, Stampede Pass to Easton; (HUCs 170300010304 Stampede Creek-Yakima River; 170300010306 Little Creek-Yakima River. https://doi.org/10.25923/dfz3-5517 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project, Phase 3-4, Stampede Pass to Easton; (HUCs 170300010304 Stampede Creek-Yakima River; 170300010306 Little Creek-Yakima River" (2019), https://doi.org/10.25923/dfz3-5517 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion for the 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East Project, Phase 3-4, Stampede Pass to Easton; (HUCs 170300010304 Stampede Creek-Yakima River; 170300010306 Little Creek-Yakima River" , 2019, https://doi.org/10.25923/dfz3-5517 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 1.48 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2019 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-00360 No Description File Type: [PDF - 1.48 MB] File Type: [PDF - 1.48 MB] Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response, and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project (SPK-2019-00387) Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response, and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project (SPK-2019-00387) Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2020 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/5td6-k864 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2020). Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response, and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project (SPK-2019-00387). https://doi.org/10.25923/5td6-k864 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response, and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project (SPK-2019-00387)" (2020), https://doi.org/10.25923/5td6-k864 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response, and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Recommendations Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project (SPK-2019-00387)" , 2020, https://doi.org/10.25923/5td6-k864 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 515.94 KB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2020 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-01904 Description: Red Bluff Riverfront Park Boat Facilities Project File Type: [PDF - 515.94 KB] File Type: [PDF - 515.94 KB] National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Construction and Maintenance of Chesapeake Bay Entrance Channels and use of sand borrow areas for beach nourishment Cite CITE Title : National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Construction and Maintenance of Chesapeake Bay Entrance Channels and use of sand borrow areas for beach nourishment Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2018 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/0xqr-eq76 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2018). National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Construction and Maintenance of Chesapeake Bay Entrance Channels and use of sand borrow areas for beach nourishment. https://doi.org/10.25923/0xqr-eq76 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Construction and Maintenance of Chesapeake Bay Entrance Channels and use of sand borrow areas for beach nourishment" (2018), https://doi.org/10.25923/0xqr-eq76 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Construction and Maintenance of Chesapeake Bay Entrance Channels and use of sand borrow areas for beach nourishment" , 2018, https://doi.org/10.25923/0xqr-eq76 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 4.60 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2018 | ESA Section 7 Consultation GARF-2018-00353 Description: Consultation between USACE and NMFS on effects of dredging in the Chesapeake Bay navigation channels and borrow areas has been ongoing since the 1980s... File Type: [PDF - 4.60 MB] File Type: [PDF - 4.60 MB] Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Tallawhalt II Housing Project on the Swinomish Indian Reservation Skagit County, Washington (6th Field HUC: 171100191100 – Swinomish Channel) Cite CITE Title : Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Tallawhalt II Housing Project on the Swinomish Indian Reservation Skagit County, Washington (6th Field HUC: 171100191100 – Swinomish Channel) Corporate Authors(s) : United States. National Marine Fisheries Service Published Date : 2019 Series : ESA Section 7 Consultation DOI : https://doi.org/10.25923/addv-2813 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service (2019). Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Tallawhalt II Housing Project on the Swinomish Indian Reservation Skagit County, Washington (6th Field HUC: 171100191100 – Swinomish Channel). https://doi.org/10.25923/addv-2813 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Tallawhalt II Housing Project on the Swinomish Indian Reservation Skagit County, Washington (6th Field HUC: 171100191100 – Swinomish Channel)" (2019), https://doi.org/10.25923/addv-2813 United States. National Marine Fisheries Service "Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the Tallawhalt II Housing Project on the Swinomish Indian Reservation Skagit County, Washington (6th Field HUC: 171100191100 – Swinomish Channel)" , 2019, https://doi.org/10.25923/addv-2813 Export RIS Citation Information. Copy Copied Save Generic APA MLA Chicago RIS [PDF - 6.80 MB] Corporate Authors: United States. National Marine Fisheries Service 2019 | ESA Section 7 Consultation WCRO-2019-01681 No Description File Type: [PDF - 6.80 MB] File Type: [PDF - 6.80 MB]

More +