Female sablefish age-at-maturity in Alaska applicable to stock assessment
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Female sablefish age-at-maturity in Alaska applicable to stock assessment

Filetype[PDF-1.27 MB]


  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    This report is a summary of results from sablefish maturity studies conducted in December 2011, July through August 2015, and December 2015. More thorough investigations and descriptions of these studies have been published or are in preparation for publication. Included here are descriptions of ovarian development, definitions used for microscopic and macroscopic maturity classification, and age-at-maturity results that may be applicable to sablefish stock assessment in Alaska. In winter 2011 and 2015, microscopic methods were used to categorize maturity. In summer 2015, maturity was classified three ways: macroscopically atsea by several scientists, macroscopically from photographs by a single expert observer (standardized macroscopic), and microscopically (with histology slides). Macroscopic methods, used during the summer, resulted in estimates of the age-at-50% maturity (A50) that were younger than histological and standardized macroscopic methods. Because the macroscopic method could not be validated by the microscopic method, classifications made at-sea may not accurately represent the current oocyte development. For the summer months, oocytes were in later stages of development in the second half of August and so this time period provides the most accurate predictions whether fish will spawn in the coming season. December proved to be an ideal time to sample for maturity because fish that would spawn were in advanced stages of vitellogenesis. In winter 2011, skipped spawning was more prevalent than in the summer or winter of 2015. For the 2011 samples, incorporating skip spawning into age-at-maturity models had a large effect on age-at-maturity. [doi:10.7289/V5AFSC-PR-2017-12 (https://doi.org/10.7289/V5/AFSC-PR-2017-12)]
  • Content Notes:
    C. J. Rodgveller.

    "September 2017."

    System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 13-14).

  • Document Type:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.24