Report from the scientific peer review of the SEFSC Marine Mammal Research Program, December 11-13, 1996
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Report from the scientific peer review of the SEFSC Marine Mammal Research Program, December 11-13, 1996

Filetype[PDF-5.38 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed


  • Alternative Title:
    Scientific peer review of the SEFSC Marine Mammal Research Program, December 11-13, 1996
  • Description:
    The Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) convened an independent, expert panel on December 11-13, 1996 to conduct a scientific peer-review of the activities its Marine Mammal Research Program (MMRP) conducted during 1989-1996, and make recommendations and establish priorities for future research on marine mammals in southeast regional waters. Staff of the MMRP presented a background of the program and discussed the variety of factors, such as the several unusual mortality events of bottlenose dolphins which have occurred in the region since 1987, recommendations from a review of the program in 1989, and new mandates and funding resulting from amendments to the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which have had major impacts in determining the research activities conducted by the program. Staff from the MMRP and collaborators provided overviews of the research activities, much of which was directed at assessing abundance of coastal bottlenose dolphin stocks through a combination of large-scale aerial survey and small-scale, site-specific studies, but which also included significant efforts to estimate the abundance of pelagic cetaceans in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The panel met privately followihg the conclusion of the presentations by the staff, and developed a set of prioritized recommendations it determined were necessary to improve the overall quality of research conducted by the program. The panel identified three areas of notable performance and expertise in the program: life history analysis, response to stranding events, and survey capability. The panel also noted that the MMRP has developed and supported intensive programs to assess many aspects of the biology of bottlenose dolphins in specific coastal areas, and the panel strongly supported the continuation of these efforts. One of the major findings of the panel was that while the research needs were not substantially less than those in the other NMFS regions, the levels of staffing and funding for program were, and that this has significantly compromised the effectiveness of the program. The panel noted that this has resulted in the lack of a coherent vision for the program, an insufficient number of peer-reviewed publications, insufficient time for program staffto interact with NMFS andnon-NMFS counterparts, and insufficient diversity of expertise within the program to meet NMFS needs. The panel's highest priority recommendation was to expand the senior level staff through the addition of a coordinator, a large whale biologist, and a quantitative ecologist. The panel also provided numerous, specific recommendations for research activities it determined the MMRP should continue, expand, or initiate.
  • Content Notes:
    by Larry J. Hansen and Aleta A. Hohn.

    "December 1997."

    Also available online in PDF format.

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 56-68).

  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at

Version 3.21