The generalized gamma is a flexible distribution that outperforms alternatives when modelling catch rate data

Details

• Journal Title:
  ICES Journal of Marine Science
• Personal Author:
  Dunic, Jillian C ; Conner, Jason ; Anderson, Sean C ; Thorson, James T
• NOAA Program & Office:
  NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) ; AFSC (Alaska Fisheries Science Center)
• Description:
  Fisheries scientists use regression models to estimate population quantities, such as biomass or abundance, for use in climate, habitat, stock, and ecosystem assessments. However, these models are sensitive to the probability distribution used to characterize observation error. Here, we introduce the generalized gamma distribution (GGD), which has not been widely used in fisheries science. The GGD has useful properties: (1) it reduces to the lognormal distribution when the shape parameter approaches zero, (2) it reduces to the gamma distribution when the shape and scale parameters are equal, and (3) the coefficient of variation is independent of the mean. We assess the relative performance and robustness of the GGD to estimate biomass density across different observation error types in a simulation experiment. When fit to data generated from the GGD, lognormal, gamma, and Tweedie families, the GGD had low bias, high predictive accuracy, and appropriate confidence interval coverage under most scenarios. Finally, we fit spatiotemporal index standardization models using the R package sdmTMB to 14 species from three trawl surveys from the Gulf of Alaska and coast of British Columbia, Canada. When the Akaike information criterion weight was compared among fits using the lognormal, gamma, and Tweedie families, the GGD was the most commonly selected model. When compared via cross validation, predictive performance favoured the GGD for most (75%) Gulf of Alaska species but was less clear for the smaller British Columbia surveys. We conclude that the GGD is a flexible and effective choice for modelling fisheries-independent survey data, offering several advantages over commonly used distributions. Given its strong performance in both simulation and empirical analyses, we recommend that practitioners consider the GGD when selecting error distributions for these models.
• Source:
  ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(4)
• DOI:
  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf040
• ISSN:
  1054-3139 ; 1095-9289
• Format:
  PDF
• Publisher:
  Oxford University Press (OUP)
• Document Type:
  Journal Article
• License:
  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Rights Information:
  CC BY
• Compliance:
  Submitted
• Main Document Checksum:
  urn:sha-512:e29246befe9a6610a19904b62f8a2760b233de66b67f6b63e010c2422ff4a4565a44907015bda3a0d5a8e25642a35bfa0b24e2f01b3474d717f775a5e95f7bdc
• Download URL:
  https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/70146/noaa_70146_DS1.pdf
• File Type:
  [PDF - 2.39 MB ]