Methods of isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria from environmental samples: A scoping review
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Methods of isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria from environmental samples: A scoping review

Filetype[PDF-232.54 KB]


Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Tuberculosis
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
    CIRES (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences)
  • Description:
    Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous in the environment. Some species of NTM are pathogenic and cause lung disease in susceptible persons. Epidemiologic studies of environmental NTM infection risk rely on both culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques for NTM isolation and identification. In this review, we summarized current methods used to isolate and identify NTM from the environment. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science: Core Collection, and Global Health (CAB Direct) for peer-reviewed studies from the last 12 years. We identified 1685 unique citations and 110 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Approximately half (55%) of the studies identified in this review used a combination of culture-independent and culture-dependent methods. The most common environmental substrate analyzed was water (n = 90). Identification of current, common methods for the isolation and identification of NTM from environmental samples may contribute to the development of standard methodological practices in the future. The choice of isolation method is based on the research question, environment, and species. A summary of common methods may contribute to the development of standard practices for isolation and identification of NTM from environmental samples, which may lead to more robust and comparable results.
  • Source:
    Tuberculosis, 138, 102291
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    1472-9792
  • Format:
    pdf
  • Publisher:
    Elsevier BV
  • Document Type:
    Journal Article-Accepted Manuscript
  • License:
  • Rights Information:
    CC BY-NC-ND
  • Rights Statement:
    The NOAA IR provides access to this content under the authority of the government's retained license to distribute publications and data resulting from federal funding. While users may legally access this content, the copyright owners retain rights that govern the reproduction, redistribution, and re-use of this work. The user is solely responsible for complying with applicable copyright law.
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1