An Investigation of Large Cross-Track Errors in North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones in the GEFS and ECMWF Ensembles
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

An Investigation of Large Cross-Track Errors in North Atlantic Tropical Cyclones in the GEFS and ECMWF Ensembles

Filetype[PDF-7.22 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Monthly Weather Review
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    The largest medium-range (72–120 h) cross-track errors (CTE) of tropical cyclone (TC) forecasts from the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) over the northern Atlantic Ocean are examined for the 2008–16 seasons. The 38 unique forecasts within the upper quartile of most negative CTEs (i.e., left-of-track bias larger than 250 km by 72 h) do not have a clear common source of steering error, although 12 of the forecasts involve the underprediction of a weak upper-level trough to the west of the TC by 36 h. Meanwhile, at least 18 of the 36 most positive CTEs (right-of-track bias) are associated with TCs embedded in the southwest extent of a subtropical ridge, the strength of which is increasingly underpredicted during the first 24 h of the forecast. Excessive height falls north of the TC are driven by overpredicted divergence aloft, which corresponds to overpredicted TC outer-core convection. The convection is triggered by a 5%–20% overprediction of near-TC moisture and instability in the initial conditions. Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model simulations are run at 36-, 12-, and 4-km grid spacing for select right-of-track cases, using the GEFS for initial and lateral boundary conditions. The 36-km WRF reproduces the same growth of errors as the GEFS because of, in part, sharing the same stability and moisture errors in the initial conditions. Changes in the convective parameterization affect how quickly these errors grow by affecting how much convection spins up. The addition of a 4-km nest with no convective parameterization causes the errors to grow ~20% faster, resulting in an even larger right-of-track error.
  • Source:
    Monthly Weather Review, 149(2), 395-417
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    0027-0644;1520-0493;
  • Format:
  • Publisher:
  • Document Type:
  • Funding:
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1