Quantifying the Importance of Selected Drought Indicators for the United States Drought Monitor
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Quantifying the Importance of Selected Drought Indicators for the United States Drought Monitor

Filetype[PDF-44.62 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Using information theory, our study quantifies the importance of selected indicators for the U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM) maps. We use the technique of mutual information (MI) to measure the importance of any indicator to the USDM, and because MI is derived solely from the data, our findings are independent of any model structure (conceptual, physically based, or empirical). We also compare these MIs against the drought representation effectiveness ratings in the North America Drought Indices and Indicators Assessment (NADIIA) survey for Köppen climate zones. This reveals 1) agreement between some ratings and our MI values [high for example indicators like standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI)]; 2) some divergences (e.g., soil moisture has high ratings but near-zero MIs for ESA Climate Change Initiative (CCI) soil moisture in the Western United States, indicating the need of another remotely sensed soil moisture source); and 3) new insights into the importance of variables such as snow water equivalent (SWE) that are not included in sources like NADIIA. Further analysis of the MI results yields findings related to 1) hydrological mechanisms (summertime SWE domination during individual drought events through snowmelt into the water-scarce soil); 2) hydroclimatic types (the top pair of inputs in the Western and non-Western regions are SPEIs and soil moistures, respectively); and 3) predictability (high for the California 2012–17 event, with longer-time scale indicators dominating). Finally, the high MIs between multiple indicators jointly and the USDM indicate potentially high drought forecasting accuracies achievable using only model-based inputs, and the potential for global drought monitoring using only remotely sensed inputs, especially for locations having insufficient in situ observations.
  • Source:
    Journal of Hydrometeorology, 24(9), 1457-1478
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    1525-755X;1525-7541;
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Publisher:
    American Meteorological Society
  • Document Type:
    Journal Article
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1