Comment on “Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue”
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Comment on “Bias Correction, Quantile Mapping, and Downscaling: Revisiting the Inflation Issue”

  • 2016

  • Source: Journal of Climate, 29(23), 8665-8667
Filetype[PDF-66.94 KB]



Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Journal of Climate
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Several papers in the Journal of Climate have discussed the use of inflation of regression estimates (e.g., Karl et al. 1990; von Storch 1999), a recent one being Maraun (2013). Generally, Maraun (2013, 2014) disparages the inflation concept and is very specific in Maraun (2014) where he states that “. . . inflation is appropriate for neither prediction nor simulation” (p. 1823). He also states, “In the early years of numerical weather forecasting, a tendency of the regression method to ‘not forecasting the extremes as often as they are observed’ (Klein et al. 1959) had been noted, basically because erroneously only the predicted mean ax had been considered for the forecast but not the distribution around it. As a ‘correction’ inflation has been suggested . . .” (p. 1823). I believe Maraun’s statement (Maraun 2014) that the inflation procedure is “flawed” is unjustified and his statement that it is not appropriate for prediction is incorrect. Maraun’s treatment of inflation may inhibit its use where it would be appropriate. His statement concerning the distribution around the mean implies probability forecasts, and that would be an excellent avenue to take, provided the users of the forecasts would accept them in lieu of a specific value forecast; however, since that is many times not the case, a specific value is imperative. My purpose here is not to justify inflation as the best way to achieve regression estimates of the more rare events, as Klein et al. (1959) long ago stated, but rather to indicate that it can be used successfully as one way.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Journal of Climate, 29(23), 8665-8667
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    0894-8755;1520-0442;
  • Format:
  • Publisher:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1