Assessment of MME methods for seasonal prediction using WMO LC‐LRFMME hindcast dataset
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Assessment of MME methods for seasonal prediction using WMO LC‐LRFMME hindcast dataset

Filetype[PDF-9.03 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
Details Supporting Files You May Also Like

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    International Journal of Climatology
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Different multi‐model ensemble (MME) methods were investigated for their potential to improve the skill of 1‐month lead seasonal forecast products, based on six models from Global Producing Centers (GPCs) for long‐range forecasts (LRFs) designated by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). We first compared the hindcast performance of seven MME methods (simple composite method, SCM; simple linear regression, SLR; multiple linear regression, MLR; best selection anomaly, BSA; multilayer perceptron, MLP; radial basis function, RBF; genetic algorithm, GA) for the global 2‐m temperature and precipitation for 1983–2009. The reference datasets for 2‐m temperature and precipitation are the ERA‐Interim from European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) for hindcast verification. For real‐time verification, the data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis 1 for 2‐m temperature and climate anomaly monitoring system and outgoing longwave radiation precipitation index (CAMS OPI) for precipitation are used. According to our analysis, GA was the most successful MME method in predicting both the global 2‐m temperature and precipitation for all four seasons. GA also showed good performance in predicting the 2‐m temperature and precipitation over the 13 regional climate outlook forum (RCOF) regions in all four seasons, but the range in performance among the RCOF regions varied significantly. In a real‐time forecast period (MAM 2012‐DJF 2015/16), GA outperformed in terms of time‐averaged anomaly pattern correlation coefficient (ACC) and root‐mean‐square error (RMSE) of the 2‐m temperature, although the forecast skill difference (0.02) between GA and SCM was not statistically significant. For the precipitation, both SCM and GA also reveal better performance than other MME methods. During the very strong El Niño event in 2015, individual models show better performance than other years. Nonetheless, these two MME methods outperform all the individual models.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    International Journal of Climatology, 41(S1)
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    0899-8418;1097-0088;
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Publisher:
    Wiley
  • Document Type:
    Journal Article
  • License:
  • Rights Information:
    CC BY
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1