Impact of Radar Reflectivity Data Assimilation Frequency on Convection-Allowing Forecasts of Diverse Cases over the Continental United States
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Impact of Radar Reflectivity Data Assimilation Frequency on Convection-Allowing Forecasts of Diverse Cases over the Continental United States

Filetype[PDF-12.06 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed
Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Monthly Weather Review
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
    OAR (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research)
  • Description:
    The sensitivity of convection-allowing forecasts over the continental United States to radar reflectivity data assimilation (DA) frequency is explored within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI)-based ensemble–variational (EnVar) system. Experiments with reflectivity DA intervals of 60, 20, and 5 min (RAIN60, RAIN20, and RAIN5, respectively) are conducted using 10 diverse cases. Quantitative verification indicates that the degree of sensitivity depends on storm features during the radar DA period. Five developing storms show high sensitivity, whereas five mature or decaying storms do not. The 20-min interval is the most reliable given its best overall performance compared to the 5- and 60-min intervals. Diagnostics suggest that the differences in analyzed cold pools (ACPs) among RAIN60, RAIN20, and RAIN5 vary by storm features during the radar DA period. Such ACP differences result in different forecast skills. In the case where RAIN20 outperforms RAIN60 and the case where RAIN5 outperforms RAIN20, assimilation of reflectivity with a higher frequency commonly produces enhanced and widespread ACPs, promoting broader storms that match better with reality than a lower frequency. In the case where RAIN5 performs worse than RAIN20, the model imbalance of RAIN5 overwhelms information gain associated with frequent assimilation, producing overestimated and spuriously fast-moving ACPs. In the cases where little sensitivity to the reflectivity DA frequency is found, similar ACPs are produced.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Monthly Weather Review, 151(2), 341-362
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    0027-0644;1520-0493;
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Publisher:
    American Meteorological Society
  • Document Type:
    Journal Article
  • Funding:
    Grant no. NA19OAR4590231
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1