Utilizing the state of ENSO as a means for season‐ahead predictor selection
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Utilizing the state of ENSO as a means for season‐ahead predictor selection

Filetype[PDF-3.83 MB]



Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Water Resources Research
  • Description:
    This paper introduces the Nino Index Phase Analysis (NIPA) framework for forecasting hydroclimatic variables on a seasonal time scale. Antecedent Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) are commonly used in statistical predictive frameworks for seasonal forecasting, however, the typical approach of evaluating all the years on record in one bin (“phase”) does not often provide the level of skill required by decision makers. For many locations around the world, the most influential climate signal on the seasonal time scale is the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), and there are various indices used to capture the state of ENSO and provide this information. NIPA utilizes the state of ENSO to classify the years of record into four phases, operating under the hypothesis that ENSO itself is affecting the “mean state” of the atmospheric‐oceanic system, and relevant teleconnections depend on and must be selected within these mean states. A case study focused on spring precipitation over the Lower Colorado River Basin (LCRB) in Texas is chosen to illustrate NIPA's potential. Results show that correlations between wintertime SST fields and spring precipitation in the LCRB improve from 0.21 to 0.47 for the typical “one phase” and the NIPA “four‐phase” approach, respectively. Even greater improvements are seen across tercile‐based skill scores such as the Heidke Hit Skill Score and Ranked Probability Skill Score; skill is particularly strong for years exhibiting extreme wet or dry conditions. It also outperforms the North American Multi‐Model Ensemble predictions across the LCRB for the selected seasons. This is encouraging as improved predictability through NIPA may translate to better decision‐making for water managers.
  • Source:
    Water Resources Research, 52(5), 3761-3774
  • ISSN:
    0043-1397;1944-7973;
  • Format:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.26