Can evolutionary constraints explain the rarity of nitrogen‐fixing trees in high‐latitude forests?
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Can evolutionary constraints explain the rarity of nitrogen‐fixing trees in high‐latitude forests?

Filetype[PDF-1.26 MB]



Details:

  • Journal Title:
    New Phytologist
  • Description:
    SummaryThe rarity of symbiotic nitrogen (N)‐fixing trees in temperate and boreal (‘high‐latitude’) forests is curious. One explanation – the evolutionary constraints hypothesis – posits that high‐latitude N‐fixing trees are rare because few have evolved. Here, we consider traits necessary for high‐latitude N‐fixing trees. We then use recent developments in trait evolution to estimate that > 2000 and > 500 species could have evolved from low‐latitude N‐fixing trees and high‐latitude N‐fixing herbs, respectively. Evolution of N‐fixing from nonfixing trees is an unlikely source of diversity. Dispersal limitation seems unlikely to limit high‐latitude N‐fixer diversity. The greater number of N‐fixing species predicted to evolve than currently inhabit high‐latitude forests suggests a greater role for ecological than evolutionary constraints. Contents Summary 1195 I. Introduction 1196 II. The role of diversity 1196 III. An evolutionary framework for the success of high‐latitude N‐fixing woody symbioses 1196 IV. Conclusions 1200 Acknowledgements 1200 References 1200
  • Source:
    New Phytologist, 211(4), 1195-1201
  • ISSN:
    0028-646X;1469-8137;
  • Format:
  • Publisher:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.26