Selection of planning unit size in dynamic management strategies to reduce human‐wildlife conflict

Welch, Heather; Liu, Owen R.; Riekkola, Leena; Abrahms, Briana; Hazen, Elliott L.; Samhouri, Jameal F.

doi:10.1111/cobi.14201

Advanced Search

Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

Advanced Search
Custom Query

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Selection of planning unit size in dynamic management strategies to reduce human‐wildlife conflict

2023
By Welch, Heather ; Liu, Owen R. ; Riekkola, Leena ; ...
Source: Conservation Biology (2023)

[PDF-1.52 MB]

Details You May Also Like

Details:

Journal Title:

Conservation Biology
Personal Author:

Welch, Heather ; Liu, Owen R. ; Riekkola, Leena ; Abrahms, Briana ; Hazen, Elliott L. ; ... More +

Welch, Heather ; Liu, Owen R. ; Riekkola, Leena ; Abrahms, Briana ; Hazen, Elliott L. ; Samhouri, Jameal F. Less -
NOAA Program & Office:

NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) ; NWFSC (Northwest Fisheries Science Center) ; SWFSC (Southwest Fisheries Science Center)

NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) ; NWFSC (Northwest Fisheries Science Center) ; SWFSC (Southwest Fisheries Science Center) Less -
Description:

Conservation planning traditionally relies upon static reserves, however there is increasing emphasis on dynamic management (DM) strategies that are flexible in space and time. Due to its novelty, the field of DM lacks best practices to guide design and implementation. We assess the effect of planning unit (PU) size within the context of an applied DM tool designed to reduce entanglements of protected whales in a lucrative U.S. crab fishery. We find that smaller PUs avoided up to $47M of revenue loss and reduced entanglement risk by up to 25% compared to the large PUs currently in use by avoiding the incidental closure of lose‐lose areas with low biodiversity value and high fisheries revenue. However, larger PUs were more buffered against the effects of an unprecedented marine heatwave in 2014–16, and were less affected by delays in data availability. Our findings suggest that novel and adaptive management solutions ‐ rather than a one‐size‐fits‐all approach ‐ are needed to separate wildlife from their threats under a changing climate.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Keywords:

[+]

Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior And Systematics Nature And Landscape Conservation
Source:

Conservation Biology (2023)
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14201
ISSN:

0888-8892;1523-1739;
Publisher:

Wiley
Document Type:

Journal Article
Funding:

Grant no. NA22OAR4310560
Rights Information:

Accepted Manuscript
Compliance:

Library
Main Document Checksum:

[+]

urn:sha256:45cf92662cfa8bfe5e2c72ca40e3f8978e34acca516699cdd261b6d5b4f00cb1
Download URL:

https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/57701/noaa_57701_DS1.pdf
File Type:

No Additional Files

More +

Selection of planning unit size in dynamic management strategies to reduce human‐wildlife conflict

Details:

Supporting Files

You May Also Like