Anchoring on visual cues in a stated preference survey: The case of siting offshore wind power projects
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Document Data
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Anchoring on visual cues in a stated preference survey: The case of siting offshore wind power projects

Filetype[PDF-588.93 KB]


  • Journal Title:
    Journal of Choice Modelling
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    We consider anchoring on visual cues in a contingent-behavior study of the effects of offshore wind power projects on beach use on the East Coast of the United States. In an internet-based survey of beachgoers, we show respondents visual simulations of wind power projects at three offshore distances and vary the order in which respondents see the visuals -- so some see near visuals first and some see far visuals first. Respondents are asked how their trip-taking behavior may be affected by the projects. In parametric and non-parametric analyses, we find strong anchoring in the far-to-near ordering of the visuals and weak anchoring in the near-to-far ordering. We also find greater dependence on the first-shown visual versus the most-recent-shown visual. Finally, we find some effects of having viewed wind turbines in real life before entering the survey. The size of the anchoring effect has important policy implications insofar as it affects the predicted change in visitation and hence measured impact of offshore wind power projects. It also has implications for the interpretation of results from other stated preference surveys using visuals and on how surveys are designed.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Journal of Choice Modelling, 38, 100264
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
  • Format:
  • Publisher:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Accepted Manuscript
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at

Version 3.26.1