An initial analysis of alternative sample designs for the deployment of observers in Alaska
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


An initial analysis of alternative sample designs for the deployment of observers in Alaska

Filetype[PDF-1.04 MB]


  • Description:
    Changes in regulation enacted in 2013 have enabled the Alaska Fisheries Science Center's Fishery Monitoring and Analysis Division (FMA) and Alaska Regional Office's Sustainable Fisheries Division to work collaboratively on an Annual Deployment Plan (ADP). Each ADP documents how the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) plans to deploy observers into fishing activities for the coming year under the limits of available funding. Draft ADPs are presented to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) during September - October and are finalized in December. The sampling design for observer deployment has two elements: how the population is subdivided (i.e., stratification schemes) and how available samples are allocated (i.e., allocation strategies). Here the relative performance of 12 alternative sampling designs for the deployment of observers into at-sea operations are compared in support of the 2016 draft ADP. These designs were defined by combinations of six potential stratifications and whether allocations were proportional to effort (defined by trips) or to reduce the weighted variance of total groundfish retained and discarded ('optimal') allocation. Performance metrics included a gap analyses as well as single-stage estimates of precision and accuracy. These three metrics were combined into a single score for design comparison. Gap analysis scores were used in a 'hurdle-model' approach for final design evaluations. The four designs with above-average gap analyses and final scores were proposed for consideration in the draft 2016 ADP; two of these stratified by gear (Trawl, Hook and Line, and Pot). Preliminary anticipated coverage rates were generated for the four candidate designs. For the draft 2016 ADP, the NMFS proposed that the sample design for the observer deployment be defined in units of trips stratified by three gear types with sample sizes allocated according to a blended optimal allocation strategy. At their October 2016 meeting, the Council supported this design for the final 2016 ADP. [doi:10.7289/V5/TM-AFSC-307 (]
  • Content Notes:
    C. H. Faunce.

    "November 2015."

    doi:10.7289/V5/TM-AFSC-307 (

    System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Includes bibliographical references (pages 21-23).

  • Document Type:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at

Version 3.26