Do views of offshore wind energy detract? A hedonic price analysis of the Block Island wind farm in Rhode Island
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Do views of offshore wind energy detract? A hedonic price analysis of the Block Island wind farm in Rhode Island

Filetype[PDF-417.09 KB]


Details You May Also Like

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Energy Policy
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Sea Grant Program:
    RIU (Rhode Island Sea Grant)
  • Description:
    Social concern and disapproval of offshore wind by coastal communities causes delays and costs to offshore wind development. One concern is property value impacts stemming from a loss of pristine ocean views. We evaluate this concern using the Block Island Wind Farm (BIWF), the first of its kind in the United States. While the BIWF has fewer turbines than currently proposed offshore wind developments, it is situated about 26 km [16 miles] from the Rhode Island mainland, which is a policy relevant distance, given that proposed US developments tend to be 21–32 km from coastlines. Using properties from the mainland, we estimate difference-in-differences hedonic valuation models with treatment defined by views of BIWF. Across many specifications and samples, we find no evidence of negative impacts to property values. Coefficient estimates are both negative and positive, but none are statistically distinguishable from zero. We additionally estimate hedonic models using properties on Block Island, which is only 4.8 km from the BIWF, meaning the BIWF is more of a visually dominant feature there as compared to the mainland. These models similarly find insignificant effects of views. In sum, our findings suggest that the viewshed impacts of the BIWF were minimal.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Energy Policy, 167, 113060
  • DOI:
  • ISSN:
    0301-4215
  • Publisher:
    Elsevier BV
  • Document Type:
    Journal Article
  • Funding:
    Grant no. NA14OAR4170082
  • Rights Information:
    Accepted Manuscript
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.26