Winners and losers in a warming Arctic: Potential habitat gain and loss for epibenthic invertebrates of the Chukchi and Bering Seas, 2008–2100
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

Winners and losers in a warming Arctic: Potential habitat gain and loss for epibenthic invertebrates of the Chukchi and Bering Seas, 2008–2100

Filetype[PDF-330.51 KB]



Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
  • Description:
    Our goal was to examine how the epibenthic invertebrate community in the Pacific Arctic Region might be affected by continued increases in ocean temperatures. We used epibenthic invertebrate catch and bottom temperature data collected on groundfish assessment and ecosystem surveys in the Bering and Chukchi seas from 2009 to 2018 to determine the “preferred” temperature of all taxa. We grouped taxa into five clusters according to their similarity in median temperature and temperature range. We then used an ensemble of eight climate models under Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) scenarios to project bottom temperature from present (2008) to mid-century (2050) and end of the century (2100). Based on these projections, we show how the amount and distribution of cluster-specific thermal habitat might change with ocean warming. We found that by mid-century there was a 50% decrease in thermal habitat for all clusters except for the most eurythermic cluster, and that thermal habitat contracted to the north. By the end of the century there was very little thermal habitat for all clusters, except the most eurythermic cluster, and habitat was further contracted to the north. The cold-water and stenothermic cluster, hypothesized to be the most vulnerable to ocean warming, had virtually no projected thermal habitat by the end of the century. These “losers” were primarily gastropods and the bivalve mussel Musculus sp. These taxa are some of the primary prey to the endangered Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus), which is harvested as a food resource in native Alaskan communities. Bivalves are prey for commercial flatfish such as yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera) and Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus). By 2100 the most eurythermic cluster, hypothesized to be the least vulnerable to warming, had projected suitable thermal habitat throughout most of the Bering and Chukchi seas, except nearshore coastal regions. The most abundant species of these “winners” was the basketstar Gorgonocephalus cf. arcticus. The loss of thermal habitat for all but the “winners” could impact the species diversity of the Bering and Chukchi seas because the “winner” cluster accounted for only 26 taxa or 8% of all taxa observed. Although temperature is a key determinant of habitat, a full habitat and ecosystem model is needed to provide more detailed predictions. In addition, more laboratory studies of thermal acclimation potential of Arctic benthic invertebrates are needed. Our results provide the first indications that the epibenthic invertebrate community in the Bering and Chukchi seas, which supports marine mammals, seabirds and human communities, may be seriously impacted by future ocean warming.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 206, 105210
  • ISSN:
    0967-0645
  • Format:
  • Publisher:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Accepted Manuscript
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.26