An investigation of the effective climate sensitivity in GFDL’s new climate models CM4.0 and SPEAR
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

An investigation of the effective climate sensitivity in GFDL’s new climate models CM4.0 and SPEAR

  • 2022

  • Source: Journal of Climate, 35(17), 5637-5660
Filetype[PDF-7.64 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed

Details:

  • Journal Title:
    Journal of Climate
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Despite a relatively low climate sensitivity indicated by atmospheric-only simulations with uniform sea surface temperature (SST) warming, GFDL’s new climate model CM4.0 participating in CMIP6 and the seasonal-to-decadal prediction system SPEAR, both of which use an identical atmospheric model AM4.0, produce relatively high effective climate sensitivity (EffCS). The substantial increase in CM4.0’s EffCS is found to be caused by additional positive forcing associated with the CO2 fertilization effect on vegetation, enhanced positive feedback due to stronger reduction in Southern Hemisphere (SH) sea ice concentration (SIC), and clouds whose feedback depends on SST warming patterns. Compared to a SPEAR run using a static vegetation model (SPEAR-SV), CM4.0 produces roughly 30% larger EffCS, among which roughly 1/3 of the increase is due to dynamical vegetation with the rest due primarily to changes in SIC. Although cloud feedback does not explain the key feedback differences among CM4.0, SPEAR, and SPEAR-SV, it is the primary cause of the models’ increase (less negative) in TOA net feedback during the later period of their quadrupling CO2 simulations due to changes in their SST warming patterns. Moreover, CM4.0’s SST warming pattern and its effects on cloud feedback appear to be the leading cause of CM4.0’s EffCS increase compared to the earlier generation GFDL model ESM2M, which produces one of the lowest EffCS values among CMIP5 models. In comparison, CM4.0’s enhanced reduction in SH SICs plays a slightly less important role in its increase in EffCS compared to ESM2M.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Journal of Climate, 35(17), 5637-5660
  • DOI:
  • Document Type:
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1