Field-measured variables outperform derived alternatives in Maryland stream biodiversity models
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Publication Date Range:


Document Data


Document Type:






Clear All

Add terms to the query box

Query box

Clear All

Field-measured variables outperform derived alternatives in Maryland stream biodiversity models

Filetype[PDF-864.52 KB]


  • Journal Title:
    Diversity and Distributions
  • Sea Grant Program:
  • Description:
    Aim In order to map patterns of biodiversity in support of conservation efforts, statistical models require environmental variables with full coverage across the study area, typically in the form of gridded surfaces derived from GIS, remote sensing or via interpolation. However, derived variables may not be as physiologically relevant or as representative of on-the-ground conditions as field-measured variables. Here, we examine differences in the abilities of derived and field-measured variables to explain and predict biogeographical patterns of freshwater fish and benthic invertebrate communities. Location Maryland first- through fourth-order streams, USA. Methods We fit generalized dissimilarity models to fish and benthic invertebrate occurrence data (n = 2,165 site-years sampled over 18 years) using one set of field-measured predictors collected concurrent and collocated with faunal sampling, two sets of derived predictors (one representing local and one representing upstream conditions) or a combination. We then compared how well models explained and predicted spatial turnover in taxonomic composition (beta diversity). Results For all regions (four physiographic regions and the state as a whole) and for both fish and benthic invertebrates, models fit with field-measured variables were more explanatory and usually more predictive than models fit with derived variables. Within the category of derived predictors, those accounting for upstream conditions were more explanatory and predictive than local-scale versions. Main conclusions Although derived variables are most commonly used to describe and map biodiversity, they may be broadly inferior to field-measured variables as predictors in low-order stream biodiversity models. Collection of field-measured data and development of derived data that consider upstream conditions and capture physiologically relevant environmental characteristics are likely to improve our capability to predict and explain spatial patterns of low-order stream biodiversity.
  • Source:
    Diversity and Distributions 23(9): 1054-1066
  • Sea Grant Document Number:
  • Document Type:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Rights Information:
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at

Version 3.18