Regulatory And Outreach Strategies For Aquatic Invasive Species In Oregon
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Regulatory And Outreach Strategies For Aquatic Invasive Species In Oregon

Filetype[PDF-3.12 MB]



Details:

  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Sea Grant Program:
  • Description:
    Western states use a myriad of outreach and regulatory approaches to prevent the entry, establishment and spread of aquatic invaders. The states of Idaho and Washington have funded outreach and mandatory boat inspection stations; in doing so, they have intercepted trailered boats infested with aquatic invasive species, such as zebra and quagga mussels. However, Oregon courts have interpreted Oregon1s constitution to prevent state officials from conducting searches without probable cause by means of mandatory check stations in other contexts, if criminal penalties could result. This raises questions on whether voluntary boat inspections are effective and what actions must be taken to increase the effectiveness of aquatic invasive species prevention programs. Would Oregon1s constitution allow officials to operate mandatory boat inspection stations if no criminal sanctions could result? If so, what is the likely efficacy of mandatory boat inspections if only civil penalties could result? What changes to the constitution, statutes and administrative rules would need to be made to allow mandatory boat inspections for the effective control of invasive species? What combination of mandatory inspections, outreach, and voluntary actions would effectively lessen the threat and spread of aquatic invasive species? This project included three phases of research and outreach on effective combinations of regulatory and voluntary measures to minimize the threat of invasive species movement from contaminated vehicles and boats into, within and out of the state. This report includes the findings from a portion of Phase I of this project. Specifically, telephone interviews were conducted with aquatic invasive species program leads in other western states to research effective regulatory approaches to limit the spread of AIS in locations where those species currently exist (e.g., quagga mussels in Lake Mead) or have a high risk of being invaded.
  • Sea Grant Document Number:
    NSGLC-S-13-001
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1