Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel Improvement Project
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

i

More Documents Available as Supporting Files

Click to view more supporting documents

Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Response for the La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel Improvement Project

Filetype[PDF-2.64 MB]


Details Supporting Files Related Documents You May Also Like

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel Improvements Project
  • Corporate Authors:
    United States. National Marine Fisheries Service. West Coast Region
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    The consultation for the La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel Improvement Project (Project) was initiated April 22, 2021, and was conducted in accordance with the 2019 revised regulations that implement section 7 of the ESA (50 CFR 402, 84 FR 45016). NMFS reviewed the likely effects of the proposed action on essential fish habitat (EFH), pursuant to section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(b)), and concluded that the action would adversely affect the EFH for Pacific Coast salmon. Therefore, we have included the results of that review in Section 3 of this document. Based on the best available scientific and commercial information, the biological opinion concludes that the proposed Project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the federally listed as threatened California Central Valley steelhead distinct population segment (Oncorhynchus mykiss) or destroy or adversely modify its designated critical habitat. For the above species, NMFS has included an incidental take statement with reasonable and prudent measures and terms and conditions that are necessary and appropriate to avoid, minimize, or monitor incidental take of listed species associated with the Project.
  • Keywords:
  • Series:
    ESA Section 7 Consultation
  • DOI:
  • Format:
    PDF
  • Consultation Number:
    WCRO-2021-00619
  • Document Type:
    Biological Opinion
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Related Documents

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1