Partition of analysis and forecast error variance into growing and decaying components
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields



Document Data
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page


Partition of analysis and forecast error variance into growing and decaying components

Filetype[PDF-2.71 MB]


  • Journal Title:
    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    Due to the scarcity of and errors in observations, direct measurements of errors in numerical weather prediction (NWP) analyses and forecasts with respect to nature (i.e. “true” error) are lacking. Peña and Toth (2014) introduced an inverse method called SAFE-I where true errors are (a) theoretically assumed to follow exponential error growth, and (b) estimated from the perceived errors (i.e. forecast minus verifying analysis) that they affect. While decaying or neutral errors, by definition will not have a significant impact on longer-range forecast errors, they can still accumulate in, and negatively influence NWP data assimilation–forecast cycles. In a new, generalized version of the inverse method (SAFE-II), analysis and forecast error variance is decomposed into exponentially growing and decaying components, assuming they are independent as they comprise vectors from the leading and trailing ends of the Lyapunov spectrum, respectively. SAFE-II uses the initial variance and decay rate associated with non-growing perturbations to describe and estimate their behaviour. The assumptions behind SAFE-II are first validated in a simulated environment. SAFE-II is then applied to estimate the error variance in both simulated and operational analyses/forecast environments. Perceived error measurements are found to be statistically consistent (at the 95% significance level) with the SAFE-II error behaviour model, which offers a more accurate description of error variance than SAFE-I that neglects decaying errors. At various levels and for different variables, decaying errors are found to constitute up to 60% of the total analysis error variance, much of which decays during the first 12–18 hr of forecast integrations.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146(728)
  • DOI:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Accepted Manuscript
  • Compliance:
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at

Version 3.26.1