Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem v4.1.3 coupled with the GOCART aerosol module

Ukhov, Alexander; Ahmadov, Ravan; Grell, Georg; Stenchikov, Georgiy

doi:10.5194/gmd-14-473-2021

Back to Previous Page

Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem v4.1.3 coupled with the GOCART aerosol module

2021

By Ukhov, Alexander ; Ahmadov, Ravan ; Grell, Georg ; ...

Source: Geoscientific Model Development, 14(1), 473-493

[PDF-9.21 MB]

Select the Download button to view the document

This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed

Details Supporting Files You May Also Like

Details:

Journal Title:

Geoscientific Model Development

Personal Author:

Ukhov, Alexander ; Ahmadov, Ravan ; Grell, Georg ; Stenchikov, Georgiy

NOAA Program & Office:

OAR (Oceanic and Atmospheric Research) ; GSL (Global Systems Laboratory) ; CIRES (Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences)

Description:

In this paper, we rectify inconsistencies that emerge in the Weather Research and Forecasting model with chemistry (WRF-Chem) v3.2 code when using the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART) aerosol module. These inconsistencies have been reported, and corrections have been implemented in WRF-Chem v4.1.3. Here, we use a WRF-Chem experimental setup configured over the Middle East (ME) to estimate the effects of these inconsistencies. Firstly, we show that the old version underestimates the PM2.5 diagnostic output by 7 % and overestimates PM10 by 5 % in comparison with the corrected one. Secondly, we demonstrate that submicron dust particles' contribution was incorrectly accounted for in the calculation of optical properties. Therefore, aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the old version was 25 %–30 % less than in the corrected one. Thirdly, we show that the gravitational settling procedure, in comparison with the corrected version, caused higher dust column loadings by 4 %–6 %, PM10 surface concentrations by 2 %–4 %, and mass of the gravitationally settled dust by 5 %–10 %. The cumulative effect of the found inconsistencies led to the significantly higher dust content in the atmosphere in comparison with the corrected WRF-Chem version. Our results explain why in many WRF-Chem simulations PM10 concentrations were exaggerated. We present the methodology for calculating diagnostics we used to estimate the impacts of introduced code modifications. We share the developed Merra2BC interpolator, which allows processing Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) output for constructing initial and boundary conditions for chemical species and aerosols.

Source:

Geoscientific Model Development, 14(1), 473-493

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-473-2021

Document Type:

Journal Article

Rights Information:

CC BY

Compliance:

Submitted

Main Document Checksum:

[+]

Download URL:

https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/30962/noaa_30962_DS1.pdf

File Type:

	Ukhov_GeosciModDev_2021.xml
	Ukhov_GeosciModDev_2021.xml

More +

You May Also Like

Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models

Cite

Lin, Haipeng

;

Jacob, Daniel J.

...

2021 | Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506,

Emissions are a central component of atmospheric chemistry models. The Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) is a software component for computing em...

[PDF - 1.31 MB]

The Aerosol Module in the Community Radiative Transfer Model (v2.2 and v2.3): accounting for aerosol transmittance effects on the radiance observation operator

Cite

Lu, Cheng-Hsuan

;

Liu, Quanhua

...

2022 | Geoscientific Model Development, 15(3), 1317-1329

The Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), a sensor-based radiative transfer model, has been used within the Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (...

[PDF - 5.17 MB]