Flash Drought in CMIP5 Models
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

For very narrow results

When looking for a specific result

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Dates

to

Document Data
Library
People
Clear All
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

The NOAA IR serves as an archival repository of NOAA-published products including scientific findings, journal articles, guidelines, recommendations, or other information authored or co-authored by NOAA or funded partners. As a repository, the NOAA IR retains documents in their original published format to ensure public access to scientific information.
i

Flash Drought in CMIP5 Models

Filetype[PDF-5.77 MB]


Select the Download button to view the document
This document is over 5mb in size and cannot be previewed

Details:

  • Alternative Title:
    ‘‘Flash drought’’ (FD) describes the rapid onset of drought on subseasonal times scales. It is of particularinterest for agriculture because it can deplete soil moisture for crop growth in just a few weeks. To better understand theprocesses causing FD, we evaluate the importance of evaporative demand and precipitation by comparing three differentdrought indices that estimate this hazard using meteorological and hydrological parameters from the CMIP5 suite ofmodels. We apply the standardized precipitation index (SPI); the evaporative demand drought index (EDDI), derived fromevaporative demandE0; and the evaporative stress index (ESI), which connects atmospheric and soil moisture conditions bymeasuring the ratio of actual and potential evaporation. The results show moderate-to-strong relationships (r2.0.5)between drought indices and upper-level soil moisture on daily time scales, especially in drought-prone regions. We find thatall indices are able to identify FD in the top 10-cm layer of soil moisture in a similar proportion to that in the models’climatologies. However, there is significant intermodel spread in the characteristics of the FDs identified. This spread ismainly caused by an overestimation ofE0, indicating stark differences in the land surface models and coupling in individualCMIP5 models. Of all indices, the SPI provides the highest skill in predicting FD prior to or at the time of onset in soilmoisture, while both EDDI and ESI show significantly lower skill. The results highlight that the lack of precipitation is themain contributor to FDs in climate models, withE0playing a secondary role.
  • Journal Title:
    Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Personal Author:
  • NOAA Program & Office:
  • Description:
    ‘‘Flash drought’’ (FD) describes the rapid onset of drought on subseasonal times scales. It is of particularinterest for agriculture because it can deplete soil moisture for crop growth in just a few weeks. To better understand theprocesses causing FD, we evaluate the importance of evaporative demand and precipitation by comparing three differentdrought indices that estimate this hazard using meteorological and hydrological parameters from the CMIP5 suite ofmodels. We apply the standardized precipitation index (SPI); the evaporative demand drought index (EDDI), derived fromevaporative demandE0; and the evaporative stress index (ESI), which connects atmospheric and soil moisture conditions bymeasuring the ratio of actual and potential evaporation. The results show moderate-to-strong relationships (r2.0.5)between drought indices and upper-level soil moisture on daily time scales, especially in drought-prone regions. We find thatall indices are able to identify FD in the top 10-cm layer of soil moisture in a similar proportion to that in the models’climatologies. However, there is significant intermodel spread in the characteristics of the FDs identified. This spread ismainly caused by an overestimation ofE0, indicating stark differences in the land surface models and coupling in individualCMIP5 models. Of all indices, the SPI provides the highest skill in predicting FD prior to or at the time of onset in soilmoisture, while both EDDI and ESI show significantly lower skill. The results highlight that the lack of precipitation is themain contributor to FDs in climate models, withE0playing a secondary role.
  • Keywords:
  • Source:
    Journal of Hydrometeorology, 22(6), 1439-1454
  • DOI:
  • Document Type:
  • Rights Information:
    Other
  • Compliance:
    Submitted
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • Download URL:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files
More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.27.1