A Comparison of Soundings Retrieved from Polar Orbiter Radiances by Two Very Different Retrieval Algorithms
Advanced Search
Select up to three search categories and corresponding keywords using the fields to the right. Refer to the Help section for more detailed instructions.

Search our Collections & Repository

All these words:

For very narrow results

This exact word or phrase:

When looking for a specific result

Any of these words:

Best used for discovery & interchangable words

None of these words:

Recommended to be used in conjunction with other fields

Language:

Dates

Publication Date Range:

to

Document Data

Title:

Document Type:

Library

Collection:

Series:

People

Author:

Help
Clear All

Query Builder

Query box

Help
Clear All

For additional assistance using the Custom Query please check out our Help Page

i

A Comparison of Soundings Retrieved from Polar Orbiter Radiances by Two Very Different Retrieval Algorithms

Filetype[PDF-972.42 KB]



Details:

  • Personal Author:
  • Description:
    "This paper compares two sets of atmospheric vertical temperature profiles produced from NOAA-7 radiance measurements using two different methods. The first retrieval technique (here after referred to as R1) uses eigenvectors of covariance matrices of radiance, temperature, and water vapor mixing ratio to estimate cloud-free infrared sounding 'radiances and vertical temperature profiles from infrared and microwave spectrometer observations (Smith and Woolf, 1976). This technique is currently used by NESDIS to produce a global set of atmospheric temperature profiles twice daily on an operational basis. The other retrieval technique (henceforth called R2) employs an iterative inverse solution of the radiative transfer equation. This technique requires an initial estimate of the temperature and moisture profiles, usually obtained from an NMC forecast (Smith, 1970; Smith and Woolf, 1981). One potential advantage of this latter method, is that the individual soundings chosen for processing may be selected by a human being through the use of a McIDAS terminal. An operator of such a terminal can carefully edit the infrared and microwave data to be processed by viewing the data on a television console. The operator can also cause geographically proximate soundings of his choice to be spatially averaged before they are processed into temperature profiles. It should be noted that, while a considerable amount of man-machine interaction was used in order to produce the edited sounding sets reported on here, CIMSS has, in the past year, substantially automated the entire editing process. Such a spatially averaged sounding, called a sounding field of view, or SFOV, should be free of unrepresentative radiance information caused by soundings through low clouds, or over snow cover, or unusual terrain, etc. since the operator can exclude these from the average (Smith, et al., 1978). Of course, such spatial averaging reduces the horizontal resolution of the data. The set of soundings described in this paper, on the other hand, was edited not by averaging, but by allowing many more soundings to be included over the same geographical area than are permitted in the operationally processed data with method R1 (Figure 1). Might this greater density of polar orbiter data be an improvement over the current data density, especially over the oceans? This study was undertaken to at least begin to address this question"--Introduction.
  • Content Notes:
    Edward A. O'Lenic.

    "May 1984."

    "This is an unreviewed manuscript, primarily intended for informal exchange of information among NMC staff members."

    System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Includes bibliographical references (page 6).

  • Document Type:
  • Place as Subject:
  • Rights Information:
    Public Domain
  • Compliance:
    Library
  • Main Document Checksum:
  • File Type:

Supporting Files

  • No Additional Files

More +

You May Also Like

Checkout today's featured content at repository.library.noaa.gov

Version 3.26