{"Bibliographic":{"Title":"Preliminary evaluation of the new juvenile collection, bypass, and sampling facilities at McNary Dam, 1994","Authors":"","Publication date":"1996","Publisher":""},"Administrative":{"Date created":"08-16-2023","Language":"English","Rights":"CC 0","Size":"0000113217"},"Pages":["SH153\n.Mc22\nPreliminary evaluation\n1996\nof the new juvenile\ncollection, bypass, and\nsampling facilities\nCZES\nat McNary Dam,\n1994\nCoastal Zone and\nEstuarine Studies\nby\nDivision\nDouglas M.Marsh, Bruce H. Monk,\nBenjamin P. Sandford, and\nNorthwest Fisheries\nGene M. Matthews\nScience Center\nNational Marine\nFisheries Service\nNovember 1996\nSeattle, Washington","NWF5C108\nPRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE NEW JUVENILE COLLECTION, BYPASS, AND\nSAMPLING FACILITIES AT MCNARY DAM, 1994\nSH\n157.85\nF56\n/\nE88\n1994\nby\nDouglas M. Marsh\nBruce H. Monk\nBenjamin P. Sandford\nand\nGene M. Matthews\nResearch funded by\nU.S. Army Corp of Engineers\nWalla Walla District\nContract DACW68-84-H-0034\nand\nCoastal Zone and Estuarine Studies Division\nNorthwest Fisheries Science Center\nNational Marine Fisheries Service\nNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration\n2725 Montlake Boulevard East\nSeattle, Washington 98112-2097\nNovember 1996","","EXECUTIVE SUMMARY\nWe conducted research to evaluate the new juvenile fish bypass system at McNary Dam,\nwhich was completed and began operating in spring 1994.\nOur evaluations at McNary Dam in 1994 were intended to accomplish the following\nobjectives: 1) to determine if mechanical problems existed in the new facility that might affect\nfish passing though its channels, flumes, and pipes, 2) to determine the accuracy of the facility\nsampling system, and 3) to determine if the outfall pipe safely passed juvenile fish.\nWe accomplished part of the first and third objectives and all of the second objective\nduring 1993 evaluations, and in 1994, we completed evaluations for all remaining objectives.\nResults for the work completed in 1993 were described in a previous report (Marsh et al. 1995).\nFollowing is a summary of major findings under Objectives 1, 2, and 3 which were accomplished\nin 1994.\nObjective 1\nEvaluate the condition and survival of yearling and subyearling chinook salmon and\nyearling and adult steelhead after passage through the collection/transportation facility.\nWe found that passage through all routes from the new collection channel to exit from the\nfacility through either the barge, truck, or return-to-river was satisfactory for outmigrating spring\nchinook salmon and steelhead. After their release to the collection channel, the median passage\ntime for the juvenile steelhead tested was 17.8 hours.\nBlood analysis of outmigrating yearling spring/summer chinook salmon, juvenile\nsteelhead, and subyearling chinook salmon showed that the fish were not overly stressed or\nfatigued as they passed through the facility.\nTo assess the effects of the system on adult fallbacks, we released 21 adult steelhead into\ngatewells. Adult downstream passage was not as satisfactory as that of juveniles, and we\nobserved adults holding along the sides of the primary dewaterer. Of the 21 fish released, only\n14 were observed on the separator, while 4 of the remaining 7 were found in the collection\nchannel more than 2 months after release. The median passage time of the 14 adults recovered\non the separator was 17.2 hours.\nObjective 2\nEvaluate the reliability and efficiency of the collection facility sampling system.\nOur initial study design for this objective proved to be unsatisfactory, most likely due to\nthe design of the separator. Utilizing a different method we were able to determine that the\niii","sampling system was effective and reliable in sampling at most sampling rates. The lone\nexception to this was at a 4% sample rate on the large fish flume.\nObjective 3\nEvaluate the bypass system outfall pipe.\nOur efforts under this objective were limited to a review of video from inside the outfall\npipe and the inspector's confirmation of smooth welds.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nWe concluded that the new collection channel, separator, flumes leading to the\nlaboratory, and flumes leading to the raceways, barge, truck, and river, as well as the outfall pipe,\nare safe for migrating juvenile salmonids. Overall, the new bypass facility appears to safely pass\nfish through the dam. Our only recommendation is to test the PIT-tag detection/diversion system\nat McNary Dam when it becomes operational in 1995.\niv","CONTENTS\nEXECUTIVE SUMMARY\niii\nINTRODUCTION\n1\nOBJECTIVE 1: Evaluate the condition and survival of yearling and subyearling chinook salmon and\nyearling and adult steelhead after passage through the collection/transportation facility.\n5\nApproach\n5\nDescaling, Injury, and Mortality Evaluation\n5\nPassage Time Evaluation\n11\nStress Evaluation\n11\nResults and Discussion\n13\nDescaling, Injury, and Mortality Evaluation\n13\nPassage Time Evaluation\n20\nStress Evaluation\n21\nOBJECTIVE 2: Evaluate the reliability and efficiency of the collection facility sampling system.\n26\nApproach\n26\nResults and Discussion\n29\nOBJECTIVE 3: Evaluate the bypass system outfall pipe.\n33\nApproach\n33\nResults and Discussion\n34\nCONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\n34\nACKNOWLEDGEMENTS\n36\nREFERENCES\n37\nAPPENDIX\n40\nV","INTRODUCTION\nThe first McNary Dam juvenile collection and bypass facility was constructed in 1979 by\nthe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to\nstudy juvenile salmonid transportation on the Columbia River. In 1981, this facility became part\nof the smolt transportation program operated by the COE (which includes similar facilities at\nLower Granite, Little Goose, and Lower Monumental Dams on the Snake River). To increase\nfish-holding capacity and improve barge-loading facilities at McNary Dam, construction of an\nentirely new juvenile collection and transportation facility was initiated in 1993. The new facility\nwas first used during the 1994 juvenile salmonid outmigration.\nBecause the collection channel for the old juvenile fish facility moved bypassed fish to\nthe north (the old facility was located between the powerhouse and the spillbays), a new\ncollection channel had to be constructed to carry bypassed fish to the new facility located\ndownstream of the dam on the southern shore. The new collection channel was constructed\nwithin the existing ice and trash sluiceway. Fish enter this channel through 1-m-long flumes\nattached to the existing orifices. After entry, they move to the south end of the powerhouse, go\nthrough primary and secondary dewaterers, and enter a closed, smooth, iron pipe. This pipe\ntransports fish and water approximately 145 m to a pneumatic switch gate, where the fish either\ncontinue on to the wet separator or are bypassed to the river through a closed corrugated pipe.\nThe corrugated pipe transitions to a closed plastic outfall pipe approximately 110 m offshore.\nThe outfall pipe terminates with a drop of approximately 5 m to the water surface (depending on\ntail-water level) (Fig. 1).","D\nNorth\nFigure 1. . Schematic of the juvenile bypass system at McNary Dam.\nE\nD\nC\n2\n1\nShoreline\nG\nH\nF\n1 Closed, smooth pipe to swing gate to\nF Black plastic outfall pipe (76 cm dia.)\nE Closed, corrigated pipe (91 cm dia.)\nD Closed, smooth pipe (91 cm dia.)\n2 Closed, corrigated pipe to closed,\nMcNary Dam Bypass System\nColumbia River\nG Pneumatic facility swing gate\nB Emergency bypass channel\nclosed, corrigated pipe\nH Flume to wet separator\nA Collection Channel\nA\nplastic pipe\nTransition areas:\nC Dewaterer\nB","Fish entering the wet separator are graded into two sizes; large and small fish then exit\nthe wet separator volitionally into separate flumes. From either of these two flumes, fish may\nenter 1) the PIT-tag diversion system, 2) the sample holding tanks, 3) the river-return line (flume\nfor small fish only), 4) the direct barge-loading lines or, 5) the raceways. The eight main\nraceways are 2.4 m wide by 20 m long and hold approximately 72,000 liters (19,000 gal) of water\nor 4,300 kg (9,500 lbs) of fish (at the maximum operating/holding capacity of 60g per liter (0.5\nlbs per gal) of water). Fish in the raceways can be loaded onto either transport trucks (only from\nraceways 1-4) or barges (from all eight raceways). All of the river-return lines and barge- and\ntruck-loading lines are made of 25-cm-diameter PVC pipe (Fig. 2).\nSince 1990, new collection/bypass facilities have been constructed at Little Goose and\nLower Monumental Dams. At both facilities, evaluations prior to operation revealed some areas\nthat caused descaling and injury (Monk et al. 1992, Marsh et al. 1995). Isolating these problems\nprior to full-time operation of the facilities provided the opportunity to make the structural\nmodifications and procedural changes before the start of the main collection/transport season.\nSimilarly, it was important to conduct evaluations of the new juvenile fish facility at McNary\nDam, since this facility was expected to collect and transport over seven million migrating\njuvenile salmonids during the outmigration. It was critical that the facility be evaluated early in\nthe season SO any problems could be corrected before the bulk of the 1994 outmigration arrived\nat the dam.\nOur study objectives in 1994 were: 1) to determine if mechanical problems existed that\nmight affect both juvenile and adult salmonids during passage, and to determine how juveniles\n3","2. . Schematic of the juvenile fish collection system at McNary Dam.\nA Flume from collection channel\nMcNary Dam Collection Facility\nH Small fish river-return line\nI Raceway river-return line\nG PIT tag diversion system\nF Sample holding tanks\nM Laboratory raceways\nE Sample head boxes\nL Truck loading line\nJ Barge loading line\nD Large fish flume\nC Small fish flume\nPIT tag detector\nNorth\nK Direct load line\nB Wet separator\nLaboratory\nM\nL\nD\no\nB\no\n8\n4\nE\nF\nG\nRaceways\nRaceways\n7\nWest\n3\nEast\n6\n2\nA\no\nO\n5\n1\nH\nC\nK\nI\nJ\nShoreline\nColumbia River\nFigure","responded physiologically to different parts of the system; 2) to determine the accuracy of the\nfacility sampling system; and 3) to determine if the outfall pipe safely passed juvenile salmonids.\nOBJECTIVE 1\nEvaluate the condition and survival of yearling and subyearling chinook salmon and\nyearling and adult steelhead after passage through the collection/transportation facility.\nApproach\nDescaling, Injury, and Mortality Evaluation\nTo determine whether mechanical problems existed within the bypass and collection\nfacilities, hatchery fish were released into different sections of the facilities (Table 1). Fish were\nrecaptured downstream, and the effects of each section were determined by examining the\nreleased fish for descaling, injuries, and mortalities. All test groups except Release Group 1\nconsisted of a test and a control group of fish marked by either an upper or lower caudal clip.\nControl fish for paired replicates were released directly into the collection device to isolate\ndescaling or injury caused by the recapture or handling procedures.\nAll test groups consisted of yearling chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and\nsteelhead (O. mykiss) trucked from Dworshak National Fish Hatchery. Yearling chinook salmon\narrived at the dam on 9 March, and steelhead arrived in three separate loads on 9, 16, and 23\nMarch. All fish were immediately fin-clipped upon arrival. However, because of mechanical\nproblems and construction delays at the McNary facility, fish were held at the facility for 16 to 30\ndays before being released for evaluation purposes into the various sections of the facility.\nDuring the delay, fish were fed a minimum-subsistence diet. Nevertheless, when testing started,\n5","Floating recovery net\nFloating recovery net\nTable 1. Release groups, species, area evaluated, and release and collection sites for each test under\nCollection site\nWest raceways\nWest raceways\nNet in truck\nNet in barge\nNet in barge\nNet in barge\nSample room\nat outfall\nat outfall\nCollection channel\nSmall-fish flume\nSmall-fish exit\nLarge-fish exit\nat Units 1, 17\nfrom separator\nfrom separator\nRelease site\nWest raceways\nWest raceways\nEast raceways\nRaceway No. 5\nExit from\nseparator\nExit from\nseparator\nand 14.\n1) Small-fish return to\nObjective 1. All fish were of hatchery origin.\n2) Truck-loading pipes\n2) Barge loading pipes\n2) Barge-loading pipe\n2) Barge loading pipe\n2) River return pipe\n1) Primary dewaterer\n2) Raceway entrances\n2) Raceway entrances\n1) Small-fish flume\n1) Large-fish flume\n1) Small-fish flume\n1) Large-fish flume\n2) Transport pipe\nArea evaluated\n4) Sample system\n1) Raceway exits\n1) Raceway exits\n1) Raceway exit\nriver pipe\n3) Separator\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nYr. chinook\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSteelhead\nSpecies\nRelease Group\n4\n1\n2\n2\n3\n5\n5\n6\n6","the fish, especially the yearling chinook salmon, were heavily smolted with very deciduous\nscales, which made them as susceptible to descaling as river-run smolts.\nRelease Group 1 (released 8-9 April) was used to evaluate the components of the\ncollection system from the collection channel into the sampling room (Table 1). Since this\nevaluation area terminated at the sample room, no capture nets were needed to recapture fish for\nexamination; therefore, a control group to assess recapture injuries was not used. To isolate\neffects of passing through the collection channel, separate releases were made in the north (Unit\n14), middle (Unit 7), and south (Unit 1) sections of the channel. The facility sample gate was\nopened (100% sample) for 5 days, SO that fish holding in the separator would not avoid\ncollection. After the release, fish were collected in the holding tank every 24 hours, crowded and\nflushed into the sample facility, anesthetized with tricane methanesulfonate (MS-222), and\nexamined for descaling and injuries.\nRelease Group 2 (release made on 26 March) was used to test the flumes leading from the\nseparator to the raceways, and the discharges into the raceways. Fish were released into both the\nlarge- and small-fish flumes just below the wet separator and collected in a raceway. The area\nwithin the raceway was reduced by moving the raceway crowder just beyond the turbulence zone\nat the head of the raceway. After fish had entered the raceway, the water level was dropped, and\nfish were dip-netted from the raceway, anesthetized (MS-222), and examined for descaling and\ninjuries.\nRelease Group 3 (release made on 30 March) was used to test the raceway exits and the\ntruck-loading lines. In order to approach the maximum raceway-loading condition of 60g of fish\nper liter (0.5 pounds per gallon) of water, fish were crowded into the tail section of each raceway\n7","under a full head of water. Also, by being at the tail of the raceway, the fish were exposed to the\nhigher flows and turbulance associated with a full head of water exiting the raceway, increasing\nthe likelihood of descaling and injury if any physical problems with the exit oriface or exit pipes\nexisted. A large fyke net, with a sanctuary bag in the cod end, was used to line the rear\ncompartment of a COE transport truck. Controls were released directly into this compartment\nprior to release of test fish from a raceway. A sanctuary dip-net was then used to capture and\ntransport the control and test fish to a tank where they were anesthetized (MS-222) and examined\nfor descaling and injury.\nRelease Group 4 (releases made on 6-7 April, 10 April and 17 April) was used to test the\nraceway exits and barge-loading lines from all eight raceways. The same net used to capture fish\nin the transport truck was draped into a compartment on the barge, and the release pipe was\ncentered over the net approximately 1.5 m above the water surface. After capture, the procedures\nwere the same as previously described for the other test groups.\nRelease Group 5 (release made on 28 April) was used to evaluate the direct barge-loading\nsystem, which included both the small- and large-fish flumes (from the separator) and the barge-\nloading pipes. Recapture and examination procedures used for the test and control fish were\nsimilar to those used for Release Group 4.\nTo evaluate the river-return lines, Release Group 6 (release made on 27 April) was\ndivided into two releases: one to the raceway river-return line, and the other to the river- return\nline from the separator flume that passed small fish. The procedure for the raceway release was\nsimilar to that used for other raceway release groups. For the river-return line from the small-fish\nflume, fish were released into the flume just below the separator with all gates adjusted so that\n8","Net Frame\nNet\nSanctuary Bag\nSaddles\nFloating Frame\nThe floating recovery-net system used under\nFigure 3.\nObjective 1. The floating frame was constructed of\n30-cm foam-filled polyethylene pipe. Saddles were\nwelded onto the pipe to hold the 7.6 m X 7.6 m\nstainless steel net frame. The net was attached to\nboth the top of the net frame and the legs and\ntapered to a sanctuary bag at the bottom.\n9","fish continued on to the river-return line. The floating net described by Marsh et al. (1995) was\nused to recapture these fish at the exit of the river-return pipe (Fig. 3). The net was towed into\nposition below the river-return pipe by skiffs, and control fish were placed into the net just prior\nto release of the test fish. After all fish were recaptured, the net was hauled to the tailrace of the\ndam, lifted by crane, and emptied into tanks on the tailrace deck. The fish were then anesthetized\n(MS-222) and examined for descaling and injury.\nWe conducted adult steelhead testing during fall 1994. Adults used were fallbacks; fish\nthat entered a turbine intake and were guided into the juvenile collection system after they had\nascended the adult ladder to the forebay. The adults were collected as they crossed the separator.\nEach adult steelhead was anesthetized with MS-222 and marked below the dorsal fin on the left\nside of its body with a uniquely numbered Floy Tag For each fish, any body marks (e.g., gillnet\nmarks, open wounds, etc.), length, and sex were noted during tagging. After allowing recovery,\ngroups of 2-4 fish were transported to the upper deck of the dam and released into a gatewell,\nwith date and time of release noted for each fish. A total of 21 adult steelhead were released on\n19 October, with 7 adults released into Gatewells 2B, 7B, and 14B.\nAdult fish moved volitionally down to the separator, and all adult steelhead observed on\nthe separator were checked for a tag. If a tag was found, the fish was examined for injuries. The\ntag was then removed and attached to a report form, and the tag number recorded along with the\ndate, observation time, and injuries. Each fish was then released to the river through the adult\nriver-return line. The test continued until 6 December when the collection and transport season\n1\nUse of trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries\nService.\n10","ended. Thereafter, the facility remained in bypass mode until 20 December, when it was\ndewatered for the year. The COE removed all remaining adults from the north sluiceway on\n3 January 1995.\nPassage Time Evaluation\nTo determine the passage time of juvenile salmonids through the collection channel and\nseparator, we PIT tagged and released 100 river-run juvenile steelhead into the collection\nchannel. Because of Endangered Species Act constraints, we were unable to use chinook salmon\nfor this test. The PIT-tagged steelhead were released into the upper end of the collection channel\n(Unit 14C), and the release date and time was recorded. Each PIT-tagged fish was recorded by\nPIT-tag detection units in the flumes exiting the separator. The PIT-tag detection units assigned\na date and time to each observation. By comparing the collection channel release time of each\nsteelhead with its flume observation time, we determined the passage time of each steelhead\nthrough this part of the facility.\nUsing the individual passage times, we developed a 95% bootstrap confidence interval\n(Efron 1982) around the median passage time.\nStress Evaluation\nTo examine the new facility in terms of physiological effects, stress and fatigue indices\nwere measured in naturally migrating yearling chinook salmon and steelhead smolts. Four\nlocations were sampled: 1) gatewell 7B (baseline levels), 2) primary dewaterer, 3) wet separator,\nand 4) the raceways. To determine the effects of raceway residence, fish were sampled at 0, 2, 4,\n6, and 10 hours after raceway collection. For each species, 15 blood samples were collected from\n11","each site and time interval (raceway) on 4 separate nights and later assayed for plasma cortisol,\nglucose, and lactate. Yearling chinook salmon and steelhead were sampled between 9 May and\n19 May, and subyearling chinook salmon were sampled from 27 June and 30 June.\nBecause chinook and steelhead smolts tend to move through Columbia River\nhydroelectric projects in the evening (Sims et al. 1981, Gessel et al. 1986), fish were sampled\nbetween 1800 and 1900 h from the first three locations. This was done to maximize the\nprobability that fish sampled were primarily from a single population moving through the facility\nand not primarily from fish that remained overnight or longer in the system.\nNormally, the maximum fish loading density is 60g of fish per liter of water (0.5 lb per\ngal) during fish holding operations at COE juvenile fish facilities. Assuming that maximum\nstress is more likely at higher densities, we attempted to expose fish in the raceways to higher\ndensities to quantify the maximum stress response. However, we needed to minimize the time\nduring which fish were collected in the raceways (prior to the start of sampling). Therefore,\nbefore any fish were collected, the raceway crowder was positioned to reduce the length of the\nraceway by one-half to three-quarters. Fish were then collected in the shortened raceway for 4\nhours. Thus, when the sampling for blood plasma began (denoted as 0-hour), an individual fish\nmay have been in the sample population from 0 to 4 hours and raceway densities ranged from\n12-24 g of fish per liter of water (0.1 to 0.2 lb per gal). The holding densities were estimated\nusing the hourly sample count taken by the COE, and the species composition and average\nweight by species were attained from the daily index sample collected by the Washington\nDepartment of Fish and Wildlife.\n12","Fish were collected from all test areas with a standard dip net and were immediately\nplaced in a 200-mg/L solution of MS-222. This procedure does not significantly alter any of the\nblood indices being measured (Black and Connor 1964, Strange and Schreck 1978). Immediately\nafter gilling activity ceased, the caudal peduncle was severed and blood was collected with a\n0.25-ml ammonium-heparinized capillary tube. Blood samples were then centrifuged, and the\nplasma decanted and frozen immediately on dry ice. Plasma cortisol, glucose, and lactate were\nassayed at Oregon State University. Thawed plasma was assayed for cortisol using a\nradioimmunoassay, for glucose using the o-toluidine method, and for lactate using a fluorimetric\nenzyme reaction (Barton et al. 1986, Barton and Schreck 1987).\nMean stress indices were analyzed by Randomized Block Analysis of Variance\n(RBANOVA). Significant changes between locations and raceway times were then examined\nwith Fisher's Protected Least Significant Differences (FPLSD) multiple comparison techniques\n(Petersen 1985).\nResults and Discussion\nDescaling, Injury, and Mortality Evaluation\nLittle or no mortality, descaling, or eye/head injuries were observed in any of the release\ngroups for either yearling chinook salmon or steelhead (Tables 2 and 3 and Appendix Table 1).\nIn nearly all cases, the types of problems that were initially found at Little Goose and Lower\nMonumental Dams--concrete and construction debris left in flumes and dewatering sections,\nunsanded concrete edges, and inside edges protruding in pipe joints (Monk 1992, Marsh et al.\n1995)--were nonexistent on startup of this facility.\n13","Table 2. Mortality and descaling and injury of hatchery-reared juvenile\nyearling chinook salmon released into the collection and loading\nfacilities at McNary Dam, 1994.\nLocation\nMortality (%)\nDescaling (%) Eye/Head Injury (%)\nRelease Group 1 - Collection channel to sample facility\n- Unit 1B\n0.5\n0.3\n0.0\n- Unit 7B\n0.5\n0.2\n0.2\n- Unit 14B\n0.3\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 2 - Separator to west raceway\n- Small fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.5\n- Large fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 3 - Raceways to truck\n- Raceway 1\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 2\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 3\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 4\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 4 - Raceways to barge\n- Raceway 1\n0.0\n0.0\n1.0\n- Raceway 2\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 3\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 4\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 5\n0.0\n1.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 6\n0.0\n0.0\n1.0\n- Raceway 7\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 8\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 5 - Separator to barge (direct loading)\n- Small fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n1.2\n- Large fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 6 - River returns\n- Small fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.5\n- Raceway return line\n0.5\n0.5\n0.0\n14","Table 3. Mortality and descaling and injury of hatchery-reared juvenile\nyearling steelhead released into the collection and loading\nfacilities at McNary Dam, 1994.\nLocation\nMortality (%)\nDescaling (%) Eye/Head Injury (%)\nRelease Group 1 - Collection channel to sample facility\n- Unit 1B\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Unit 7B\n0.3\n0.3\n0.0\n- Unit 14B\n0.3\n0.3\n0.0\nRelease Group 2 - Separator to west raceway\n- Small fish flume\n0.0\n0.5\n0.0\n- Large fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 3 - Raceways to truck\n- Raceway 1\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 2\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 3\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 4\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 4 - Raceways to barge\n- Raceway 1\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 2\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 3\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 4\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 5\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 6\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 7\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway 8\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease Group 5 - Separator to barge (direct loading)\n- Small fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Large fish flume\n0.0\n0.0\n0.0\nRelease group 6 - River returns\n- Small fish flume\n1.0\n0.0\n0.0\n- Raceway return line\n1.5\n0.0\n0.0\n15","In the first replicates of Release Group 1, some mortalities were found from all three\nrelease locations. However, these were fish that were stranded in the fish transfer pipe between\nthe sample holding tank and the sample room (laboratory). All of the new collection/transport\nfacilities seem to have this problem initially, because they are designed to minimize the amount\nof water used to flush the fish into the lab SO as not to dilute the anesthetic water. Since it is\nimpossible to see into the transfer pipes, the amount of water used and the proper timing for\nflushing must be learned by trial and error. Once the proper procedures were learned for this\noperation, stranding in the pipe was no longer a problem, as evidenced by the mortality rates of\nzero for yearling chinook salmon and 0.7% (one of 136) for steelhead during the second\nreplicates for all three locations.\nThere was a concern about the gates that divert fish from the main flume into the sample\ntanks or the east raceways because their leading edge protruded into the water flow. During the\nreleases (Release Group 2), personnel were positioned near the gates to record any contact\nobserved between fish and the leading edges of the gates. Neither the visual observations or the\nresults of descaling/injury analyses (Tables 2 and 3), identified a problem with the leading edges\nof the gates.\nThe McNary Dam facility raceways are similar to those at Lower Monumental Dam. At\nboth facilities, standard operating procedures are to remove excess water from the fish\ntransportation flumes because if too much water is allowed in the flumes, water exiting the fish\ntransportation flumes arcs across the raceway and contacts the opposite wall before plunging into\nthe raceway. There was concern that fish might contact this wall and become descaled or\n16","injured. However, the water apparently acted as a buffer since no descaling or injuries were\nobserved at this location (Tables 2 and 3).\nThe main concerns in both raceway releases (Release Groups 3 and 4) were the raceway\nexits. The raceway exits at McNary Dam differ from those at the other collection/transportation\nfacilities in that separate exits are used for truck and barge loading. The truck-loading exits are\non the raceway sides, while the barge-loading exits are on the raceway bottoms. At the Lower\nMonumental and Little Goose Dam facilities, descaling and injury levels were high during the\ninitial test releases due to rough edges in the exit itself or in the exit pipe. However, this was not\nthe case at McNary Dam, and minimal descaling was observed in both release groups of yearling\nchinook salmon and steelhead.\nDescaling and injury were also minimal for yearling chinook salmon and steelhead in\ntests of the river-return line (Release Group 6). These results indicated that no problems existed\nin either the flumes or the pipes. However, for steelhead, the mortality rate was higher than for\nany other release group. Because of the handling stress involved in releasing these fish, some\nmortalities were removed even before the releases were made. We believe this was because they\nwere the last groups released, and, due to construction delays, were held for 43 to 50 days.\nFew adult steelhead fallbacks were observed during spring 1994. However, we were able\nto conduct the test the following fall when adult steelhead fallbacks were more numerous. Since\nwater temperatures remained in the 16-20° C range, we theorized that passage time would not\ndiffer between spring and fall. Of the 21 adults released, 14 were subsequently observed on the\nseparator: 5 from the gatewell 2B release, 4 from the gatewell 7B release, and 5 from the\ngatewell 14B release (Table 4 and Appendix Table 3). Of the 14 fish observed, 2 from the\n17","Table 4.\nPassage time (days) , mortality, and descaling and\ninjury for adult steelhead released into the gatewells\nand recovered on the separator at McNary Dam in 1994.\nMedian\npassage\nNumber\nNumber\ntime\nMortality\nDescaling\nInjury\nLocation\nreleased\nobserved\n(days)\nN (%)\nN (%)\nN\n(%)\nGatewell\n- 1B\n7\n5\n1.8\n0\n0.0\n0\n0.0\n2\n40.0\n- 7B\n7\n4\n0.1\n0\n0.0\n0\n0.0\n1\n25.0\n- 14B\n7\n5\n0.8\n0\n0.0\n0\n0.0\n1\n20.0\nTotals\n21\n14\n0.7\n0\n0.0\n0\n0.0\n4\n28.6\n18","100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\n0\n1\n2\n3\n4\nDays\nFigure 4. .\nPercent passage of 21 adult steelhead released into\ngatewells 1B, 7B, and 14B (seven per gatewell) , and\nrecaptured on the fish/debris separator at McNary\nDam, October 1994. (After release, four fish were\nsubsequently observed during system dewatering, and\nthree fish were never observed again. )\n19","gatewell 2B release, and 1 each from the gatewell 7B and 14B releases showed signs of minor\ninjuries. Median passage time was 17.2 hours (Fig. 4). During testing at Little Goose Dam in\nspring 1990, a similar median passage time of approximately 13 hours was observed (Monk et al.\n1992). However, testing at Lower Monumental Dam in fall 1994 (Marsh et al. 1996) showed a\nmedian passage time of 84 hours, nearly five times longer than the time required at Little Goose\nor McNary Dams.\nThe McNary Dam facility was placed in bypass mode on 6 December, ending collection\nfor the year. When the facility was later dewatered on 20 December, three of the tagged adult\nsteelhead were observed in the collection channel. On 3 January 1995, the COE removed the\nremaining in-river fish from the north sluiceway and found another tagged adult. Three tagged\nadults were never found. Water temperatures began dropping in November, which probably\ninduced the adults to hold in the collection channel after that time.\nPassage Time Evaluation\nThe median passage time for juvenile steelhead was 17.8 hours, with a 95% confidence\ninterval between 14.4 and 22.3 hours. This passage time was over seven times longer than that\nobserved for juvenile steelhead at Lower Monumental Dam (Marsh et al. 1996). Although\nsteelhead were released at different times at the two dams (1030 at McNary Dam and 1800 at\nLower Monumental Dam), observation of the data indicated that this was probably not the\nreason for the difference in steelhead passage times between the two dams. At Lower\nMonumental Dam, 98% of the fish were detected within 24 hours of release, while at McNary\ndam, only 60% of the fish were detected within the first 24 hours, and 10% remained undetected\nafter 48 hours.\n20","A more likely explanation was the effect of low-water velocity areas within the collection\nchannel and dewaterer at McNary Dam. The collection channel drains 84 orifices. Depending\nupon orifice operations, eddies develop within the channel, particularly at the upper end.\nAnother low water-velocity area occurs where the dewaterer transitions to the pipe that transfers\nfish to the collection facility. The water velocity in this area is sufficiently low to allow fish to\nhold with little effort. During blood sampling for this objective, large numbers of fish were\nconsistently observed holding in this area.\nStress evaluation\nPlasma cortisol, lactate, and glucose levels showed no significant changes as yearling\nspring/summer chinook salmon passed from the gatewell into the raceways (Fig. 5 and Appendix\nTables 4, 5, 6 and 10). In contrast, similar testing at Little Goose (Monk et al. 1992) and Lower\nMonumental Dams (Marsh et al. 1995) showed significant changes in the levels of these blood\nindices as the fish moved through each of these facilities. The levels of all three plasma indices\nwere either lower than, or in the mid-range of, the results obtained from Little Goose and Lower\nMonumental Dams.\nFor yearling spring/summer chinook salmon, the highest average cortisol level observed\n(102.4 ng/ml in the separator sample) was below the range measured for this species above and\nbelow the wet separator at Lower Granite Dam (160-210 ng/ml) by Congleton et al. (1984). This\nvalue was also well below the values measured by Matthews et al. (1987) for yearling chinook\nsalmon after marking at Lower Granite Dam.\nPlasma cortisol and lactate showed no significant changes as juvenile steelhead passed\nfrom the gatewell into the raceways (Fig. 6 and Appendix Tables 4, 5, 6 and 11). In contrast,\n21","120\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\n120\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\nFigure 5.\nMean concentrations (+ S.E., / n = 4, n = 3 for PD) of plasma\ncortisol, lactate, and glucose for yearling spring/summer chinook\nsalmon at four locations (fish in the raceway were sampled at five\ndifferent times) in the collection and transportation facility at\nMcNary Dam, 1994. No significant differences were seen for any of\nthe parameters. Abbreviations used are: GW = gatewell; PD = post-\ndewaterer; and S = separator.\n22","similar testing conducted at Little Goose Dam (Monk et al. 1992) and at Lower Monumental\nDam (Marsh et al. 1995) showed significant changes in the levels of these blood parameters as\nfish moved through each of these facilities.\nPlasma glucose showed a significant decrease as juvenile steelhead moved from the\ngatewell to the dewaterer (P < 0.05). This decrease was maintained in the separator sample, but\nhad returned to the gatewell level in the 0-hour raceway sample. At Little Goose Dam, although\nno samples were significantly different, plasma glucose levels also decreased successively from\nthe gatewell to the separator samples. However, levels did not return to gatewell levels until the\n2-hour raceway sample (Monk et al. 1992). At Lower Monumental Dam, the plasma glucose\nlevels increased significantly between the gatewell and the 0-hour raceway sample (Marsh et al.\n1995). Overall at McNary Dam, plasma cortisol levels were lower for steelhead than the levels\nobserved at Little Goose and Lower Monumental Dams, while levels of plasma lactate and\nglucose were similar at all three dams.\nPlasma cortisol and glucose showed no significant changes as subyearling chinook\nsalmon passed from the gatewell into the raceways (Fig. 7 and Appendix Tables 7, 8, 9, and 12).\nPlasma lactate levels decreased significantly between the gatewell and the dewaterer, and\nremained low through the separator. Levels then rose significantly, back to gatewell levels, at the\n0-hour raceway sample. The plasma lactate levels again dropped significantly between the\n0-hour and the 2-hour raceway samples. Thereafter, levels remained low through the 10-hour\nraceway sample.\nThese results suggested that the physiological effects on yearling spring/summer chinook\nsalmon and steelhead smolts, and subyearling chinook salmon passing through the juvenile\n23","120\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nRW6\nRW10\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRaceways\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\n200\n150\na\na\n100\n50\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\nFigure 6. Mean concentrations (+ S.E. / n = 4) of plasma cortisol, lactate,\nand glucose for juvenile steelhead at four locations (fish in the\nraceway were sampled at five different times) in the collection\nand transportation facility at McNary Dam, 1994. Bars marked (a)\nare significantly lower than gatewell levels. Abbreviations used\nare : GW = gatewell; PD = post-dewaterer; and S = separator.\n24","100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nRWO\nRW2\nS\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\n140\n120\nb\nb\n100\nb\nb\na\na\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nPD\nS\nRWO\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\n100\n80\n60\n40\n20\n0\nGW\nRWO\nPD\nS\nRW2\nRW4\nRW6\nRW10\nRaceways\nFigure 7.\nMean concentrations (+ S.E. , n = 4; n = 2 for PD) of plasma\ncortisol, lactate, and glucose for subyearling chinook salmon at\nfour locations (fish in the raceway were sampled at five different\ntimes) in the collection and transportation facility at McNary\nDam, 1994. Bars marked (a) are significantly lower than gatewell\nlevels, and bars marked (b) are significantly lower than the 0-\nhour raceway sample. Abbreviations used are: GW = gatewell; PD =\npost-dewaterer; and S = separator.\n25","collection facility at McNary Dam are nominal. For the most part, blood indicator levels of stress\nand fatigue did not change significantly during passage through the facility. Overall, plasma\ncortisol, lactate, and glucose levels observed at McNary Dam were low to moderate compared to\nsimilar testing at other facilities.\nOBJECTIVE 2\nEvaluate the reliability and efficiency of the collection facility sampling system.\nApproach\nTo evaluate the reliability and efficiency of the collection facility sampling system, we\nreleased PIT-tagged fish upstream from the separator and monitored their passage through the\nsmall- and large-fish distribution flumes. We PIT tagged 8,382 yearling chinook salmon and\n21,028 steelhead delivered from Dworshak National Fish Hatchery. The yearling chinook\nsalmon were used to test the small-fish flume sampling system, while the steelhead were used to\ntest the large-fish flume sampling system. Because the fish were not placed directly into the\nsmall- or large-fish side of the separator, we anticipated that some hatchery chinook salmon\nwould pass through the large-fish flume and some hatchery steelhead would pass through the\nsmall-fish flume. In order to make use of this, the two flumes were tested concurrently.\nTwo sample rates per flume were tested, and both rates chosen for testing were within the\nrange of sample rates used at McNary Dam under normal fish collection operations. For the\nsmall-fish flume, the test sample rates were 10 and 5% of all the fish passing into the collection\nfacility; for the large-fish flume, these rates were set at 5 and 2%. For the 10 and 5% rates, tests\n26","were designed to determine if the measured sample rate was within one percentage point of either\nside of the set sample rate (i.e., 9 to 11% for the 10% sample rate). For the 2% rate, the test was\ndesigned to determine if the measured sample rate was within one-half a percentage point of\neither side of the set sample rate (i.e., 1.5 to 2.5%). The small-fish flume 10% sample rate and\nthe large-fish flume 5% sample rate tests were run concurrently, as were tests of the small-fish\nflume at 5% and the large-fish flume at 2%.\nWe relied upon the results of similar tests conducted at Lower Monumental Dam in\nspring 1993 (Marsh et al. 1995) to determine the numbers of fish required for precision. Based\nupon these results , we used the following formulas to estimate the numbers of tests and fish\nneeded:\nn = 4S2/W2\nx = ny\nwhere:\nn = number of tests needed\nS2 = variance of the measured sample rate\nW = half-width of the confidence interval\nX = number of fish needed\ny = number of fish in system during one test\nBefore the start of each set of tests, the sample gates in each flume were set at the rates to\nbe tested. Sample rates of 5% on the small-fish flume and 2% on the large-fish flume were tested\nfirst, and sample rates of 10% on the small-fish flume and 5% on the large-fish flume were tested\nlast.\n27","The first set of tests began at 1000 hours on 13 April, with the last release being made at\n1730 hours on 16 April. We released totals of 4,000 PIT-tagged yearling chinook salmon and\n16,000 PIT-tagged steelhead for these tests. Of these totals, 50 yearling chinook salmon and 100\nsteelhead were released every half-hour during the first 40 hours. During the last 40 hours, 100\nsteelhead were released every half-hour.\nThe second set of tests began at 0800 hours on 18 April, with the last release occurring at\n2330 hours on 19 April. We released totals of 4,000 PIT-tagged yearling chinook salmon and\n4,000 PIT-tagged steelhead for these tests. Of these totals, 50 yearling chinook salmon and 50\nsteelhead were released every half-hour for 40 hours.\nTo make a release, test fish were counted into a 114-L plastic container at ground level.\nThe container was then placed into a sling and power hoisted the 14 m up to the flume platform\nfor release into the flume approximately 10 m upstream from the separator. To obtain an\naccurate measure of the sample rate, the tests required that fish leave the separator randomly over\ntime. Therefore, fish were not released directly into the separator because we believed that this\nrelease procedure would affect the behavior of fish already in the separator.\nEach flume exiting the separator was equipped with PIT-tag detectors that recorded the\ndate and time of departure for each PIT-tagged fish. Another detector recorded PIT-tagged fish\nthat were captured by the sampling system. The sample rate was measured by comparing\ndetections at each set of detectors (e.g., if 100 PIT-tagged fish were recorded leaving the\nseparator during 1 hour and 9 were recorded by the sample detector, the measured sample rate for\nthat hour was 9%).\n28","Results and Discussion\nThe tests of the sampling system were compromised by an unexpected development.\nWhile visiting the PIT-tag equipment room at the facility, we noticed that whenever fish were\nreleased into the flume, an unusually large number of PIT-tag detections occurred immediately,\nparticularly in the large-fish flume. An examination of the observation records at the end of the\ntests revealed that twice during each hour, large numbers of detections occurred within 1-2\nminutes. Based on these observations, and since we were releasing test fish every half-hour on\nthe half-hour, we speculated that introduction of the test fish to the flume was inducing large\nnumbers of fish to exit the separator.\nAlthough the exact time of each half-hour release was not recorded, we believed it safe to\nassume that the majority of the releases occurred within the first fifteen minutes of each half-\nhour. Using the observation records of the 2% large-fish flume test, we ran a t-test (Table 5)\ncomparing the mean number of fish observed during the first fifteen minutes of each half-hour\nwith the mean number of fish observed during the second fifteen minutes of each half-hour. We\nfound that nearly 70% (P<0.001) more fish exited the separator during the first than the second\nfifteen minutes of each half-hour (Table 5).\nThe experimental design required that test fish exit the separator volitionally, and most\nimportantly, at random over the course of each hour. We concluded that this requirement was\nnot met, thus invalidating the test.\nDuring the 1994 outmigration, large numbers of fish were PIT tagged in the Snake River\nby various researchers. At each Snake River collector dam, these PIT-tagged fish were diverted\n29","Table 5. Number of PIT tags observed each hour, by 15-minute intervals\nMinutes\nNumber of\nof each\nPIT tags\nhour\nobserved\nt-value\nP\n0-14\n4,048\n8.206\n<0.001\n15-29\n2,346\n30-44\n4,435\n45-59\n2,713\n30","back to the river by the PIT-tag diversion system. Subsequently, many of these fish were\ncollected at McNary Dam throughout the spring.\nWe analyzed the observation records for McNary Dam from 13 April to 1 July 1994,\nremoving records gathered on the days that we conducted our formal tests under this Objective\n(13-16 and 18-20 April). We also removed records from dates when the facility did not operate\nfor a full 24 hours, and dates when the expected value for fish in the sample was less than one.\nThe daily sample rate for each of the dates in the analysis was provided by the Washington\nDepartment of Fish and Wildlife. Each day represented one replicate.\nOver the course of this period, 18,822 PIT-tagged fish passed through the small-fish\nflume, and 34,068 PIT-tagged fish passed through the large-fish flume. Based on our analysis,\nall of the electronic (pre-set) sample rates (2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 16.67%) fell within the 95%\nconfidence interval of the observed sample rate for the small-fish flume (Table 6). For the large-\nfish flume, the pre-set sample rates of 2%, 3%, and 5% fell within the 95% confidence interval of\nthe observed sample rate, while the pre-set sample rate of 4% fell outside of the 95% confidence\ninterval for its observed sample rate. While all but one of the sample rates tested were within the\nconfidence interval of the observed sample rates, the width of some of the confidence intervals\nindicates the variability of the data.\n31","Table 6. Results from Objective 2, using river-run PIT-tagged fish passing\nthrough the McNary Dam bypass/collection facility and recovered in\nthe sampling system, 1994.\nObserved\n95%\nPre-set\nsample rate (%)\nNumber\nsample\nConfidence\nof days\ninterval\nrate\nSmall-fish flume\n2\n23\n2.06\n(1.64, 2.48)\n1.97\n(0.19, 3.75)\n3\n3\n7\n4\n2.81\n(1.39, 4.23)\n5\n13\n4.28\n(2.06, 6.50)\n16.67\n4\n18.75\n(7.47, 30.03)\nLarge-fish flume\n2\n24\n1.80\n(1.58, 2.02)\n7\n3\n1.89\n(0.27, 3.51)\n*4\n8\n2.43\n(1.73, 3.13)\n5\n19\n4.78\n(3.70, 5.86)\nIndicates that the pre-set sample rate was outside the 95%\n*\nconfidence interval\n32","OBJECTIVE 3\nEvaluate the bypass system outfall pipe.\nApproach\nThe outfall pipe design at McNary Dam juvenile fish facility was based on the design\nused at Lower Monumental Dam. It is a 76-cm-diameter, black PVC pipe that terminates\napproximately 110 m offshore, immediately downstream from the turbine boil near the center of\nthe powerhouse. Flow and plunge conditions at the pipe terminus were similar to conditions at\nLower Monumental Dam, and turbulence in the tailrace was greater than at Lower Monumental\nDam. Therefore, we ruled out the use of a floating recovery-net similar to the one used at Lower\nMonumental Dam in 1993 (Marsh et al. 1995): these conditions had previously caused such\ninstability that precise placement of the net was not feasible.\nDuring October 1993, we examined the feasibility of using a purse seine to recapture test\nfish for this objective. Turbine units were operated selectively in an attempt to create acceptable\nconditions for purse-seine deployment. After several failed attempts, we concluded that the only\noperating conditions that would allow use of the purse seine in this area would be a complete\nshutdown of all 14 turbine units with no spill. However, it was virtually impossible to operate\nthe dam with total shutdown of all units and spill for the 8-16 hours required to complete the\ntesting.\nThe fisheries agencies and tribes agreed that a visual inspection of the pipe, combined\nwith further testing of the outfall pipe at Lower Monumental Dam in 1994 (Marsh et al. 1996)\nwould suffice as a surrogate evaluation of the McNary Dam outfall pipe. at least for the 1994\n33","outmigration. When we attempted to coordinate a visual inspection of the pipe with the COE,\nwe were advised that under the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA)\nregulations, the pipe was considered an \"enclosed space\" and was therefore subject to a strict set\nof safety requirements. Unfortunately, it was impossible to meet all of the safety requirements in\nthe limited amount of time available between completion of the pipe and opening of the facility.\nTherefore, we were unable to visually inspect the pipe.\nDuring construction, some videos of the internal welds had been made. We obtained\nthese videos (approximately 2-3 minutes in length) along with a statement from the chief\ninspector of the pipe regarding his inspections of the welds in order to meet this objective.\nNeither of these two pieces of information indicated any problems with the outfall pipe.\nResults and Discussion\nThe 1994 evaluation of the Lower Monumental Dam outfall pipe produced no statistically\nreliable results. However, based on observations from 2 years of evaluation, we are confident\nthat the Lower Monumental Dam outfall pipe safely passes migrating juvenile salmonids (Marsh\net al. 1996). These observations, together with information on the McNary Dam outfall pipe, are\nthe extent of the McNary Dam outfall pipe evaluation for 1994.\nCONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\nBased on the tests conducted, the new bypass, collection, and transportation facility at\n1.\nMcNary Dam appears to safely pass fish around the dam.\n34","The sample rates set electronically (2, 3, 4, 5, and 16.67%) for the small-fish flume and\n2.\nmost (2,3, and 5%) set for the large-fish flume provided samples that were relatively\naccurate.\nThe complete PIT-tag detection/diversion system was not operational in 1994. This\n3.\nsystem should be evaluated when it becomes operational in 1995.\n35","ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS\nWe express our appreciation to COE personnel for their assistance and cooperation\nduring the conduct of these studies. Special thanks to Brad Eby, Project Biologist, and Connie\nHampton, Assistant Project Biologist, for their help in coordinating research activities at the dam.\nTheir crew provided much needed help setting up the equipment and facilities required to carry\nout this work.\nSpecial thanks also go to the WDFW crew, headed by Paul Wagner, Fishery Biologist, for\ntheir assistance in all facets of this endeavor, from fish marking to actually conducting parts of\nthe evaluation.\nFor their ideas, assistance, and encouragement, we also thank COE fishery biologists\nRebecca Kalamasz and Teri Barila. Finally, we thank Dr. Carl Schreck and his staff at Oregon\nState University for analyzing the blood samples.\n36","REFERENCES\nBarton, B.A., and C. B. Schreck. 1987. Metabolic costs of acute physical stress on juvenile\nsteelhead. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 116:257-263.\nBarton, B. A., C.B. Schreck, and L. A. Sigismondi. 1986. Multiple acute disturbances evoke\ncumulative physiological stress responses in juvenile chinook salmon. Trans. Am. Fish.\nSoc. 115:245-251.\nBlack, E. C., and A. R. Conner. 1964. Effects of MS222 on glycogen and lactate levels in\nrainbow trout. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 21:1539-1542.\nCongleton, J. L., T. C. Bjornn, C. A. Robertson, J. L. Irving, and R. R. Ringe. 1984. Evaluating\nthe effects of stress on the viability of chinook salmon smolts transported from the Snake\nRiver to the Columbia River Estuary. Report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract\nDACW68-83-C-0029, 67 p. (Available from Idaho Cooperative Fishery Research Unit,\nDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Resources, College of Forestry, University of Idaho,\nMoscow, ID 83843.)\nEfron, B. 1982. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Society for\nIndustrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA. 92p.\n37","Gessel, M. H., L. G. Gilbreath, W. D. Muir, and R. F. Krcma. 1986. Evaluation of the juvenile\ncollection and bypass systems at Bonneville Dam--1985. Report to U.S. Army Corps of\nEngineers, Contract DACW75-85-H-0001, 63 p. + Appendix. (Available from\nNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington\n98112-2097.)\nMarsh, D. M., B. P. Sandford, & G. M. Matthews. 1995. Preliminary evaluation of the new\njuvenile collection, bypass, and sampling facilities at Lower Monumental Dam, 1993.\nAnnual report of research to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract DACW68-84-\nH-0034 48 p. + Appendices. (Available from Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725\nMontlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112-2097.)\nMarsh, D. M., L. K. Timme, B. P. Sandford, S. Achord, & G. M. Matthews. 1996.\nPreliminary evaluation of the new juvenile collection, bypass, and sampling facilities at\nLower Monumental Dam, 1994. Annual report of research to the U.S. Army Corps of\nEngineers, Contract DACW68-84-H-0034. (Available from Northwest Fisheries Science\nCenter, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112-2097.)\nMatthews, G. M., D. L. Park, J. R. Harmon, C. S. McCutcheon, and A. J. Novotny. 1987.\nEvaluation of transportation of juvenile salmonids and related research on the Columbia\nand Snake Rivers--1986. Report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract DACW68-\n84-H-0034, 34 p. + Appendix. (Available from Northwest Fisheries Science Center,\n2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112-2097.)\n38","Monk, B. H., B. P. Sandford, and J. G. Williams. 1992. Evaluation of the juvenile fish\ncollection, transportation, and bypass facility at Little Goose Dam, 1990. Annual report\nof research to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Contract E86900057, 131 p. (Available\nfrom Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle,\nWashington 98112-2097.)\nPetersen, R. G. 1985. Design and analysis of experiments. Marcel Dekker, New York. 429 p.\nSims, C. W., J. G. Williams, D. A. Faurot, R. C. Johnsen, and D. A. Brege. 1981. Migrational\ncharacteristics of juvenile salmon and steelhead trout in the Columbia River Basin and\nrelated passage research at John Day Dam. Volume 1. Report to U.S. Army Corps of\nEngineers, Contract DACW57-80-F-0394, 61 p. + Appendices. (Available from\nNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington\n98112-2097.)\nStrange, R. J., and C.B. Schreck. 1978. Anesthetic and handling stress on survival and cortisol\nconcentration in yearling chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). J. Fish. Res.\nBoard Can. 35:345-349.\n39","APPENDIX\nData Tables\n40","1. Recoveries, descaling, injuries, and mortality of hatchery\nAppendix Table\nyearling spring chinook salmon released into the collection\nand loading facilities at McNary Dam, 1993 (Objective 1)\n.\nNumber of fish\nDescaled Injured\nCollected\nMortalities\nLocation\nReleased\nRelease Group 1 - Collection channel to sample facility\nYearling chinook salmon\n- Unit 1\n400\n386\n2\n1\n0\n- Unit 7\n400\n404\n2\n1\n1\n- Unit 14\n400\n394\n1\n0\n0\nYearling steelhead\n- Unit 1\n400\n309\n0\n0\n0\n- Unit 7\n400\n312\n1\n1\n0\n- Unit 14\n400\n289\n1\n0\n0\nRelease Group 2 - Separator to raceway\nYearling chinook salmon\n- Small-fish flume\n200\n197\n- Test\n0\n0\n1\n- Control\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Large-fish flume\n- Test\n200\n191\n0\n0\n0\n- Controls\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\nYearling steelhead\n- Small-fish flume\n- Test\n200\n198\n0\n1\n1\n- Controls\n100\n101\n0\n0\n0\n- Large-fish flume\n- Test\n200\n198\n0\n0\n0\n- Controls\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\nRelease Group 3 - Raceways to truck\nYearling chinook salmon\n- Raceway 1\n100\n102\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 2\n100\n93\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (1&2)\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 3\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 4\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (3&4)\n100\n99\n0\n0\n2\nYearling steelhead\n- Raceway 1\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 2\n100\n97\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (1&2)\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 3\n100\n97\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 4\n100\n101\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (3&4)\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\n41","Appendix Table 1.\nContinued.\nNumber of fish\nLocation\nReleased Collected\nMortalities\nDescaled Injured\nRelease Group 4 - Raceways to barge\nYearling Chinook salmon\n1\n- Raceway 1\n100\n101\n0\n0\n- Raceway 2\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (1&2)\n100\n95\n0\n2\n0\n- Raceway 3\n100\n101\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 4\n100\n101\n0\n4\n0\n- Control (3&4)\n100\n99\n0\n8\n0\n0\n- Raceway 5\n100\n104\n0\n1\n- Raceway 6\n100\n108\n0\n0\n1\n- Control (5&6)\n100\n97\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 7\n100\n97\n0\n2\n0\n- Raceway 8\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\nControl (7&8)\n100\n92\n0\n2\n0\n-\nSteelhead\n- Raceway 1\n100\n98\n0\n1\n0\n0\n- Raceway 2\n100\n101\n0\n0\n- Control (1&2)\n100\n97\n0\n1\n0\n- Raceway 3\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 4\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (3&4)\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 5\n100\n100\n0\n0\n- Raceway 6\n100\n100\n0\n0\n0\n- Control (5&6)\n100\n103\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 7\n100\n107\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway 8\n100\n95\n0\n0\n0\nControl (7&8)\n100\n99\n0\n0\n0\n-\nRelease Group 5 - Separator to barge (direct loading)\nYearling chinook salmon\n- Small fish flume\n100\n83\n0\n0\n1\n- Large fish flume\n100\n92\n0\n0\n0\n- Controls\n100\n107\n0\n0\n0\nYearling steelhead\n- Small fish flume\n100\n83\n0\n0\n0\n- Large fish flume\n100\n96\n0\n0\n0\n- Controls\n100\n103\n0\n1\n0\nRelease Group 6 - River return lines\nYearling chinook salmon\n- Small fish flume\n200\n199\n0\n0\n1\n202\n1\n1\n0\n- Raceway return\n200\n- Control\n200\n205\n0\n1\n0\nSteelhead\n- Small fish flume\n200\n196\n2\n0\n0\n0\n- Raceway return\n200\n197\n3\n0\n- Control\n200\n201\n0\n0\n0\n42","Appendix Table 2. Passage times for river-run juvenile steelhead\nmarked and released at McNary Dam, 1994.\nPIT-tag\nRelease\nDetection\nPassage time\nnumber\nDate\nTime\nDate Time\n(days)\n7F7F531A45\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n8:35\n0.003\n7F7F773229\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n10:14\n0.031\n7F7F530807\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n10:33\n0.044\n7F7F413756\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n9:35\n0.045\n7F7F513A7E\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n11:04\n0.065\n7F7F756E04\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n11:36\n0.087\n7F7F760F47\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n11:39\n0.090\n7F7F585627\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n11:03\n0.106\n7F7F4B7351\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n11:16\n0.115\n7F7F3E741A\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n12:45\n0.135\n7F7F535566\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n11:55\n0.142\n7F7F757104\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n13:35\n0.170\n7F7F530120\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n13:21\n0.202\n7F7F513D67\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n13:26\n0.206\n7F7F4D7147\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n13:43\n0.217\n7F7F785B39\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n15:10\n0.236\n7F7F53151F\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n14:34\n0.253\n7F7F4F471E\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n14:49\n0.263\n7F7F526A75\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n15:57\n0.269\n7F7F54191A\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n16:21\n0.285\n7F7F505839\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n16:50\n0.347\n7F7F742151\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n17:51\n0.348\n7F7F581161\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n19:06\n0.400\n7F7F510656\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n19:18\n0.408\n7F7F760D03\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n18:41\n0.424\n7F7F58222B\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n19:12\n0.446\n7F7F59460F\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n19:44\n0.468\n7F7F3C2569\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n19:47\n0.470\n7F7F530E1F\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n19:51\n0.473\n7F7F51444C\n05/14\n8:30\n05/14\n22:04\n0.565\n7F7F4D4840\n05/14\n9:30\n05/14\n23:12\n0.571\n7F7F56147C\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n0:31\n0.626\n7F7F4D7C31\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n1:03\n0.648\n7F7F412C01\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n1:17\n0.658\n7F7F595252\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n1:18\n0.658\n7F7F557E3C\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n1:57\n0.685\n7F7F4A7E43\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n3:13\n0.738\n7F7F4E005F\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n3:20\n0.743\n7F7F561415\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n2:33\n0.752\n7F7F510A1D\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n2:42\n0.758\n43","Appendix Table 2. Continued.\nPIT-tag\nRelease\nDetection\nPassage time\nnumber\nDate\nTime\nDate\nTime\n(days)\n7F7F510147\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n4:04\n0.774\n7F7F4C1522\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n4:36\n0.796\n7F7F785A55\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n5:06\n0.817\n7F7F510219\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n4:13\n0.822\n7F7F757D30\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n4:27\n0.831\n7F7F3E6C02\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n6:19\n0.867\n7F7F413616\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n5:35\n0.878\n7F7F593E3B\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n6:32\n0.918\n7F7F4D4F7C\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n7:00\n0.938\n7F7F4C127F\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n9:40\n1.007\n7F7F49380E\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n10:29\n1.041\n7F7F513560\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n10:30\n1.042\n7F7F4B7D7D\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n10:19\n1.076\n7F7F3E7665\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n10:21\n1.077\n7F7F493B03\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n12:56\n1.143\n7F7F594E3E\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n13:00\n1.146\n7F7F4B4C6C\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n13:12\n1.154\n7F7F594000\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n12:21\n1.160\n7F7F560A2D\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n12:41\n1.174\n7F7F527F06\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n14:01\n1.188\n7F7F75322D\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n13:19\n1.201\n7F7F4D4A15\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n13:50\n1.222\n7F7F49496F\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n14:53\n1.224\n7F7F4D4A4A\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n15:05\n1.274\n7F7F506317\n05/14\n9:30\n05/15\n16:35\n1.295\n7F7F581B53\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n16:16\n1.324\n7F7F534538\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n16:53\n1.349\n7F7F755420\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n19:00\n1.438\n7F7F4A6770\n05/14\n8:30\n05/15\n19:00\n1.438\n7F7F4B3B35\n05/14\n9:30\n05/16\n0:33\n1.627\n7F7F510011\n05/14\n9:30\n05/16\n5:18\n1.825\n7F7F413F75\n05/14\n8:30\n05/16\n7:14\n1.947\n7F7F4B7610\n05/14\n9:30\n05/16\n11:53\n2.099\n7F7F785F28\n05/14\n9:30\n05/16\n13:30\n2.167\n7F7F576727\n05/14\n8:30\n05/16\n16:00\n2.313\n7F7F533F5C\n05/14\n8:30\n05/16\n23:30\n2.625\n7F7F531856\n05/14\n9:30\n05/17\n7:19\n2.909\n7F7F510F47\n05/14\n9:30\n05/17\n10:06\n3.025\n7F7F773B43\n05/14\n9:30\n05/17\n10:10\n3.028\n7F7F533E12\n05/14\n8:30\n05/18\n1:18\n3.700\n44","Mortality\nAppendix Table 3. Passage times, descaling, injuries and mortalities for adult steelhead released and\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\ndewatering)\nInjury\n(found 12/20 in channel, after dewatering)\n(found 12/20 in channel, after dewatering)\n(found 12/20 in channel, after dewatering)\nN\nN\nY\nY\nN\nN\nN\nN\nY\nY\nN\nN\nN\nN\nDescaling\nafter\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nN\nsluiceway,\nPassage\n(days)\ntime\n1.83\n0.37\n3.73\n0.75\n3.45\n<0.01\n<0.01\n0.69\n0.01\n3.09\n0.35\n0.56\n0.80\n1.90\nin\n1/3/95\n04:00\n17:05\n03:15\n03:34\n20:20\n10:30\n10:25\n03:55\n11:45\n14:55\n21:14\n03:09\n10:05\n12:30\nTime\nDetection\n(found\n10/21\n10/19\n10/23\n10/20\n10/22\n10/19\n10/19\n10/20\n10/19\n10/22\n10/19\n10/20\n10/20\n10/21\nDate\nrecovered at McNary Dam, 1994.\n10:23\n08:08\n08:08\n08:08\n09:37\n09:38\n09:38\n09:37\n10:23\n10:23\n10:23\n11:27\n11:25\n11:27\n12:50\n12:50\n12:50\n13:49\n13:49\n14:54\n14:54\nTime\nRelease\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\n10/19\nDate\ngatewell\nRelease\n2B\n2B\n2B\n2B\n2B\n2B\n2B\n7B\n7B\n7B\n7B\n7B\n7B\n7B\n14B\n14B\n14B\n14B\n14B\n14B\n14B\nLength\n(cm)\n70\n83\n58\n79\n57\n64\n63\n80\n68\n55\n73\n62\n57\n61\n64\n79\n61\n58\n55\n75\n73\nSex\nM\nF\nM\nF\nF\nM\nF\nM\nM\nF\nF\nM\nF\nF\nF\nF\nM\nM\nF\nF\nM\n07951\n07952\n07953\n07954\n07955\n07956\n07957\n07958\n07959\n07960\n07961\n07962\n07963\n07964\n07965\n07966\n07967\n07968\n07969\n07970\n07971\ncode\nTag","Appendix Table 4.\nMeans of plasma cortisol values (ng/ml), standard errors,\nRBANOVAS, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for yearling chinook salmon and\njuvenile steelhead sampled at various locations and times\nat McNary Dam, May 1994.\nYearling chinook\nSteelhead\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nMean\nS.E.\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n92.5\n8.1\n83.2\n7.2\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n97.5\n9.3\n84.4\n7.2\n4\nSeparator\n102.4\n8.1\n90.5\n7.2\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n89.5\n8.1\n101.2\n7.2\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n98.4\n8.1\n108.0\n7.2\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n84.7\n8.1\n86.9\n7.2\n8\nRaceway (6-hour)\n79.8\n8.1\n75.8\n7.2\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n92.3\n8.1\n100.9\n7.2\nYearling spring/summer chinook salmon (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n528.8\n176.3\nLocation/Time\n7\n1492.8\n213.3\n0.8\n0.5865\nError\n20\n5240.5\n262.0\nTotal\n30\n7296.7\nFPLSD = N/A\nJuvenile steelhead (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n3668.1\n1222.7\nLocation/Time\n7\n3377.8\n482.5\n2.36\n0.0606\nError\n21\n4299.1\n204.7\nTotal\n31\n11344.9\nFPLSD = N/A\n46","Appendix Table 5.\nMeans of plasma lactate values (mg/dl), standard errors,\nRBANOVAs, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for yearling chinook salmon and\njuvenile steelhead sampled at various locations and times\nat McNary Dam, May 1994.\nYearling chinook\nSteelhead\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nS.E.\nMean\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n62.1\n3.7\n59.3\n4.7\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n74.8\n4.2\n49.9\n4.7\n4\nSeparator\n65.3\n3.7\n59.9\n4.7\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n66.9\n3.7\n72.4\n4.7\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n61.5\n3.7\n62.4\n4.7\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n57.1\n3.7\n59.6\n4.7\n8\nRaceway (6-hour)\n52.3\n3.7\n53.4\n4.7\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n61.7\n3.7\n62.6\n4.7\nYearling spring/summer chinook salmon (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n503.4\n167.8\nLocation/Time\n7\n928.2\n132.6\n2.5\n0.0544\nError\n20\n1080.1\n54.0\nTotal\n30\n2687.3\nFPLSD = N/A\nJuvenile steelhead (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n279.8\n93.3\nLocation/Time\n7\n1259.7\n180.0\n2.01\n0.1014\nError\n21\n1876.1\n89.3\nTotal\n31\n3415.7\nFPLSD = N/A\n47","Appendix Table 6.\nMeans of plasma glucose values (mg/dl), standard errors,\nRBANOVAs, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for yearling chinook salmon and\njuvenile steelhead sampled at various locations and times\nat McNary Dam, May 1994.\nYearling chinook\nSteelhead\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nMean\nS.E.\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n93.9\n3.9\n153.3\n11.5\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n97.1\n4.5\n108.2\n11.5\n4\nSeparator\n91.6\n3.9\n109.7\n11.5\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n87.7\n3.9\n132.7\n11.5\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n93.1\n3.9\n137.3\n11.5\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n86.2\n3.9\n132.7\n11.5\n8\nRaceway (6-hour)\n88.3\n3.9\n131.2\n11.5\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n103.2\n3.9\n161.5\n11.5\nYearling spring/summer chinook salmon (RBANOVA)\n:\nSum of\nMean\ndf\nSource\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n466.4\n155.5\nLocation/Time\n7\n900.9\n128.7\n2.1\n0.0919\nError\n20\n1227.8\n61.4\nTotal\n30\n2550.5\nFPLSD = N/A\nJuvenile steelhead (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\ndf\nSource\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n1484.5\n494.8\nLocation/Time\n7\n9655.0\n1379.3\n2.62\n0.0413\nError\n21\n11061.2\n526.7\nTotal\n31\n22200.6\nFPLSD = 33.8\n48","Appendix Table 7.\nMeans of plasma cortisol values (ng/ml), standard errors,\nRBANOVAs, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for subyearling chinook salmon sampled\nat various locations and times at McNary Dam, June 1994.\nSubyearling chinook\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n57.2\n7.4\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n82.6\n10.4\n4\nSeparator\n75.9\n7.4\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n84.4\n7.4\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n70.8\n7.4\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n75.6\n7.4\n8\nRaceway (6-hour)\n68.1\n7.4\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n88.3\n7.4\nSubyearling chinook salmon (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n561.8\n187.3\nLocation/Time\n7\n2621.2\n374.5\n1.73\n0.1618\nError\n19\n4114.4\n216.5\nTotal\n29\n7392.3\nFPLSD = N/A\n49","Appendix Table 8.\nMeans of plasma lactate values (mg/dl), standard errors,\nRBANOVAS, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for subyearling chinook salmon sampled\nat various locations and times at McNary Dam, June 1994.\nSubyearling chinook\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n122.8\n3.6\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n75.5\n5.0\n77.7\n3.6\n4\nSeparator\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n114.2\n3.6\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n82.0\n3.6\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n78.4\n3.6\nRaceway (6-hour)\n8\n77.3\n3.6\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n87.0\n3.6\nSubyearling chinook salmon (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\ndf\nSource\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n999.1\n333.0\nLocation/Time\n7\n9153.0\n1307.6\n25.83\n<0.0001\n961.8\n50.6\nError\n19\nTotal\n29\n11089.8\nFPLSD = 13.2, = 18.7 for PD\n50","Appendix Table 9.\nMeans of plasma glucose values (mg/dl), standard errors,\nRBANOVAs, and Fisher's Protected Least Significant\nDifference (FPLSD) for subyearling chinook salmon sampled\nat various locations and times at McNary Dam, June 1994.\nSubyearling chinook\nSample\nLocation/ (Time)\nMean\nS.E.\n1\nGatewell 7B\n92.7\n3.9\n2\nPost-Dewaterer\n85.1\n5.5\n4\nSeparator\n88.2\n3.9\n5\nRaceway (0-hour)\n73.1\n3.9\n6\nRaceway (2-hour)\n82.0\n3.9\n7\nRaceway (4-hour)\n80.9\n3.9\n8\nRaceway (6-hour)\n87.0\n3.9\n9\nRaceway (10-hour)\n89.2\n3.9\nSubyearling chinook salmon (RBANOVA) :\nSum of\nMean\nSource\ndf\nSquares\nSquare\nF\nP\nBlock\n3\n831.2\n277.1\nLocation/Time\n7\n1041.4\n148.8\n2.46\n0.0563\nError\n19\n1149.5\n60.5\nTotal\n29\n3014.2\nFPLSD = N/A\n51","Fork lengths, plasma cortisol, lactate, and glucose values for migrating yearling\nAppendix Table 10.\nspring/summer chinook salmon collected from various locations and times at McNary\nDam's collection facility, 1994.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl) (mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(mm)\nSample date: 05/9/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n158\n82.9\n56.0\n73.3\n(No samples were taker at this site)\n(Not taken)\n173.8\n44.0\n89.2\n67.4\n68.2\n86.9\n158\n48.7\n59.2\n140\n49.1\n152\n310.9\n32.3\n75.6\n160\n56.0\n52.9\n103.0\n147\n102.5\n62.1\n65.6\n158\n47.9\n51.4\n123.5\n16.4\n97.7\n161\n128.5\n79.3\n74.4\n156\n57.6\n140,144\n68.6\n55.1\n63.2\n140\n117.0\n75.7\n78.2\n64.4\n39.9\n144\n186.0\n43.9\n78.6\n74.9\n149\n23.8\n81.9\n77.8\n152,145\nRaceway 0-hour\nSeparator\n72.5\n162\n188.2\n294.8\n139\n38.4\n22.8\n126.8\n117.5\n136\n20.4\n22.7\n92.9\n170\n67.4\n37.0\n54.7\n98.8\n166\n177.8\n145\n176.1\n36.9\n80.1\n34.6\n150\n50.8\n112.4\n145\n108.9\n19.5\n80.2\n63.3\n81.3\n146,133\n320.5\n41.1\n79.7\n168\n157.9\n20.2\n40.5\n104.0\n146\n183.5\n72.4\n109.9\n138\n140,127\n100.2\n53.7\n160.0\n144\n178.3\n93.0\n117.0\n65.4\n159\n222.6\n50.5\n140\n14.8\n39.9\n104.4\n14.2\n86.3\n158\n52.7\n64.3\n156\n47.8\n99.6\n132\n117.0\n75.8\n79.1\n168\n7.1\n73.3\n115.0\n65.6\n67.4\n141,142\n137.8\n105.0\n159\n142.8\n58.1\n42.6\n77.2\n155\n55.7\n65.4\n67.9\n141,131,139\n7.2\n60.8\n65.9\n71.3\n133\n106.3\n33.5\n61.3\n130,130\n106.5\n132,131\n83.8\n28.2\n81.0\n139\n43.0\n25.2\n44.0\n130\n43.2\n32.6\n100.4\n144\n17.1\n122.9\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n117.)\n125,127\n46.9\n30.6\n116.6\n142\n110.8\n49.8\n27.6\n79.8\n164\n99.3\n37.0\n81.3\n133\n20.6\n146\n67.8\n36.4\n72.9\n133,136\n37.9\n36.1\n110.7\n78.6\n127,117\n268.2\n41.4\n162.8\n153\n174.4\n30.5\n127,133\n131.7\n48.5\n142.5\n130,155\n38.9\n41.2\n90.9\n124,126\n120.3\n66.8\n143.6\n140\n89.5\n44.1\n138.1\n61.3\n100.3\n137\n37.9\n51.0\n172\n42.1\n51.0\n80.5\n106.4\n150\n226.6\n60.8\n94.5\n152,129\n80.0\n31.9\n57.4\n85.1\n161,115\n25.4\n62.4\n115.7\n153\n64.6\n164\n54.4\n59.0\n85.8\n140,132\n30.0\n50.4\n136,129\n47.0\n85.6\n68.2\n137,118\n53.6\n98.1\n72.0\n158\n66.6\n40.9\n121.8\n150\n60.6\n65.3\n71.8\n39.3\n128,130\n160.7\n55.7\n100.8\n142,123\n71.1\n111.8\n32.4\n87.5\n142\n52.2\n79.5\n53.9\n145\n157.7\nRaceway 10-hour\nRaceway 6-hour\n80.1\n126,130\n48.9\n32.4\n111.6\n153\n44.1\n38.0\n137\n142.1\n33.5\n100.4\n163\n21.5\n47.6\n120.-\n109.5\n171\n31.5\n23.9\n83.3\n148\n69.9\n22.8\n23.8\n21.3\n82.1\n132\n12.6\n145\n--\n--\n62.5\n44.9\n114.5\n135,122\n32.6\n34.6\n79.6\n175\n34.7\n119.2\n144,110\n334.4\n86.2\n455.5\n144\n42.7\n150\n41.7\n84.8\n139\n61.9\n48.4\n84.8\n--\n23.3\n34.1\n98.2\n181\n174.0\n44.3\n100.8\n136,118\n153,146\n77.7\n51.2\n82.7\n135,147\n127.2\n57.7\n100.8\n99.8\n50.4\n110.5\n130,141\n144.0\n65.0\n74.6\n155\n58.9\n96.7\n130,132\n30.0\n63.0\n69.0\n166\n123.8\n74.9\n56.8\n83.0\n126.130.127\n88.9\n57.1\n62.9\n169\n11.6\n56.3\n56.9\n140\n67.8\n65.7\n84.9\n149,130\n74.8\n67.3\n128,132\n158.4\n80.2\n75.7\n155.149.135\n--\n42.2\n67.1\n78.1\n141,132\n47.7\n78.6\n77.4\n149\n52","Appendix Table 10. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\nSample date: 05/11/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n162\n47.6\n41.5\n175.7\n152\n97.6\n112.5\n35.4\n145\n121.7\n30.4\n97.0\n153\n85.3\n56.6\n180.7\n140\n113.2\n37.9\n76.1\n161\n77.7\n40.3\n105.3\n139\n287.0\n39.5\n78.8\n166\n68.1\n60.4\n44.2\n136\n9.6\n35.0\n85.3\n128,140\n131.7\n73.6\n81.0\n123,151\n105.2\n48.4\n102.5\n160\n14.4\n64.6\n98.1\n140\n89.1\n93.4\n98.0\n148,138\n122.9\n77.0\n37.2\n151\n23.3\n57.3\n100.2\n141\n35.2\n63.1\n150.2\n180\n12.4\n58.3\n81.9\n149\n45.3\n60.3\n76.2\n171\n58.1\n69.2\n116.4\n169\n336.6\n53.3\n72.0\n125,154\n142.0\n59.3\n118.3\n139,136\n63.5\n89.8\n52.9\n135\n43.9\n63.6\n81.3\n156\n79.7\n73.8\n--\n142,135\n36.2\n91.5\n63.6\n162\n39.9\n62.6\n55.6\n140\n33.7\n66.7\n34.2\n129,133\n99.6\n123.5\n110.8\n145,156\n172.1\n-0.9\n154\n147.1\n108.0\n145.0\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n144\n35.8\n118.7\n131\n38.3\n46.6\n92.7\n151\n167.0\n65.2\n134.9\n124,130\n78.8\n44.6\n69.2\n138,128\n158.4\n55.5\n93.1\n133,133\n25.2\n46.2\n173.8\n139\n90.2\n69.8\n51.4\n130,128\n110.7\n53.2\n98.2\n139\n124.9\n77.0\n124.9\n157,132\n81.7\n54.0\n69.8\n133\n67.8\n55.4\n91.3\n158\n50.7\n43.7\n63.1\n157\n158.4\n64.1\n144.3\n154\n102.4\n103.9\n65.8\n154\n119.6\n48.0\n121.2\n137\n51.6\n65.6\n45.3\n150\n182.7\n67.9\n76.3\n124,154\n57.6\n137.2\n108.1\n160\n40.7\n120.0\n70.2\n127,134\n51.0\n75.6\n80.8\n147\n67.3\n85.7\n38.3\n145,124\n114.2\n64.4\n65.6\n145,133\n187.2\n67.7\n85.3\n145,134,137\n124.5\n99.2\n33.6\n145\n12.5\n51.4\n34.8\n132,129\n40.9\n87.1\n65.5\n155\n138.6\n93.6\n56.1\n141\n38.0\n90.0\n41.1\n147\n62.8\n119.3\n86.9\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n139\n21.5\n39.4\n134.2\n149\n70.8\n29.8\n56.0\n147\n24.2\n28.5\n58.9\n124,131\n259.2\n27.5\n89.9\n156\n14.3\n73.3\n58.5\n136\n120.4\n48.1\n109.0\n176\n16.3\n41.5\n99.6\n143\n115.4\n46.6\n82.1\n150,155\n174.1\n53.9\n150.7\n137,140\n60.1\n38.6\n80.3\n132,131\n282.3\n44.3\n139.3\n132\n106.5\n39.1\n71.9\n135,124\n120.4\n49.1\n87.1\n167\n35.2\n54.0\n89.9\n148\n22.8\n49.7\n131.1\n148,129\n31.8\n46.9\n72.2\n136,138\n56.0\n68.4\n56.7\n165\n112.7\n57.5\n85.1\n140,144\n82.1\n74.1\n60.2\n149,146\n95.5\n101.6\n--\n135,130\n123.8\n80.2\n63.1\n130,136\n96.1\n57.2\n84.6\n140,125\n120.5\n81.1\n121.4\n160\n32.7\n52.3\n59.0\n129,138\n133.3\n88.3\n82.7\n151\n71.6\n92.6\n78.9\n138,147\n58.6\n83.7\n71.3\n151,130,139\n29.4\n72.0\n50.1\n136,139\n162.1\n112.5\n82.2\n136,145\n165.7\n67.1\n77.7\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n161\n106.6\n30.6\n73.1\n144\n62.4\n34.5\n64.9\n151,121\n88.8\n141\n18.6\n57.8\n186.6\n161\n228.4\n36.8\n104.7\n175\n218.7\n68.7\n111.4\n154\n148.8\n40.9\n108.2\n134,123\n74.1\n48.6\n96.9\n144\n28.8\n35.1\n153.2\n140\n203.5\n52.4\n82.1\n142\n88.5\n37.3\n76.9\n131\n37.2\n50.4\n107.0\n135\n76.5\n37.5\n112.1\n146\n236.2\n46.5\n114.8\n137,142\n81.6\n50.1\n72.0\n146\n30.1\n47.1\n76.6\n152\n33.2\n40.4\n87.6\n129,155\n20.2\n102.4\n88.1\n139,131,128\n56.3\n93.5\n61.9\n142\n28.9\n53.5\n66.8\n157\n42.6\n75.0\n94.9\n134,112\n35.0\n74.7\n48.3\n172\n55.8\n70.0\n101.6\n133,138\n58.4\n70.1\n82.7\n144,129\n20.9\n54.6\n95.4\n141,131\n15.5\n79.6\n73.6\n138,134,135\n61.5\n83.0\n73.1\n120,132\n23.0\n125,119,150\n85.3\n78.3\n66.0\n148,131\n26.4\n118.6\n53.3\n53","Appendix Table 10. Continued.\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mm)\n(mm)\nSample date: 05/16/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n75.7\n93.1\n37.1\n30.3\n136\n92.2\n85.1\n144\n36.0\n85.1\n95.7\n31.1\n181\n183.0\n54.4\n142\n63.8\n65.6\n116.4\n52.8\n91.7\n159\n163\n149.9\n39.9\n87.5\n60.7\n93.2\n110.5\n138,140\n143.1\n150\n51.7\n65.3\n102.9\n97.6\n171\n224.4\n131,131\n49.0\n39.0\n60.1\n77.2\n153\n159.5\n144,144\n--\n--\n38.6\n52.5\n96.6\n156\n161.9\n54.1\n112.9\n143,140\n161\n30.2\n81.6\n73.1\n147,140,134\n74.9\n85.1\n81.4\n142.9\n63.0\n88.3\n163\n35.6\n65.9\n155.8\n149,144\n77.4\n64.5\n71.9\n114.3\n155\n51.0\n133.6\n165\n261.6\n99.7\n135.9\n149,138\n51.9\n101.5\n113.7\n156\n73.6\n129.1\n164\n34.3\n100.9\n171.3\n158,141\n114.1\n68.6\n124.7\n142,140\n208.3\n88.0\n48.9\n165\n54.4\n118.2\n129,140\n83.5\n85.8\n80.1\n144,153\n85.1\n94.3\n83.7\n136,125\n204.2\n88.5\n52.2\n146,152\n120.5\n79.2\nRaceway 0-hour\nSeparator\n72.9\n49.1\n55.5\n174\n59.8\n51.9\n103.6\n148\n64.5\n31.2\n75.1\n155\n49.0\n92.5\n126.7\n135\n58.8\n154.0\n20.0\n75.3\n117.0\n162\n90.6\n182\n54.2\n114.3\n118.6\n31.8\n81.3\n120,129\n47.7\n135,145\n33.5\n71.6\n76.1\n92.4\n123.3\n156\n113.5\n147\n132.3\n62.3\n68.8\n118.8\n147\n9.3\n64.2\n150\n118.7\n143\n54.6\n52.8\n170\n16.9\n66.7\n--\n69.2\n53.7\n56.9\n156,137\n170\n208.9\n106.0\n--\n175.9\n114.3\n101.6\n86.3\n155\n180.8\n67.1\n149\n40.6\n154\n26.3\n70.3\n105.3\n135,141\n92.4\n64.4\n79.6\n64.9\n44.9\n69.3\n139,123\n56.4\n64.4\n147\n87.7\n59.6\n80.4\n68.0\n148\n135\n52.3\n77.9\n55.4\n76.5\n129,138\n41.4\n81.6\n143\n298.0\n79.9\n120.6\n145,141,132\n79.4\n102.2\n65.9\n156\n143.0\n51.0\n74.1\n108.2\n66.2\n90.2\n143,138,141\n128.2\n155\n199.4\nRaceway 4-hour\nRaceway 2-hour\n24.9\n106.4\n30.3\n114.7\n156\n98.2\n145\n107.1\n42.3\n65.4\n41.7\n132,115\n19.9\n144,135\n36.2\n110.3\n192.9\n127.7\n165\n52.3\n42.4\n153\n133.7\n57.3\n98.6\n168.3\n119,124\n227.6\n63.3\n146\n47.4\n56.8\n98.5\n58.4\n126,111\n19.9\n42.6\n132\n44.3\n52.7\n123.2\n134,132\n101.2\n152,134\n37.0\n70.1\n--\n--\n47.4\n80.1\n65.9\n115.9\n148,134\n42.4\n132,129\n126.9\n55.0\n120.0\n157\n102.3\n48.5\n118.8\n143,142\n63.1\n61.2\n56.7\n64.7\n92.4\n139,128\n87.4\n141,144\n68.6\n59.1\n77.3\n140,134,140\n199.4\n67.0\n84.8\n149,129\n55.5\n61.6\n57.9\n135.6\n69.3\n70.8\n146,147\n29.8\n144\n73.3\n79.9\n66.6\n64.1\n56.7\n146,149,141\n33.5\n149\n80.2\n67.8\n81.3\n90.3\n59.7\n140,134\n103.5\n145,139\n80.7\n92.4\n146,134,130\n171.7\n69.7\n96.0\n55.8\n152\nRaceway 10-hour\nRaceway 6-hour\n139.3\n60.6\n31.2\n81.9\n160\n281.4\n51.7\n142\n97.9\n82.8\n40.3\n109.9\n122,139\n196.1\n45.4\n137,127\n396.3\n183.5\n28.3\n93.1\n148\n108.8\n42.4\n153\n65.6\n33.4\n103.0\n184\n13.8\n48.0\n107.7\n139\n34.6\n45.6\n117.8\n153\n34.8\n36.2\n90.0\n137,136\n51.8\n94.7\n38.7\n98.8\n145\n83.1\n138,150\n45.5\n48.6\n166.4\n36.5\n109.4\n153\n47.1\n69.2\n144\n94.3\n64.9\n77.3\n64.9\n54.8\n72.5\n137,121\n141,135\n122.3\n57.0\n71.8\n140,136\n43.0\n54.8\n110.5\n138,133\n84.9\n56.4\n78.5\n134,130\n163.8\n60.3\n81.0\n143\n68.1\n79.1\n59.7\n144,152\n47.9\n61.9\n62.0\n143,133\n48.5\n74.7\n72.6\n144.122.134\n32.0\n87.2\n77.8\n137,140\n75.6\n78.3\n96.6\n128.8\n81.5\n54.6\n145,144\n141,136,111\n40.8\n86.0\n59.7\n43.5\n74.9\n66.8\n138,141\n147,150\n152.3\n112.3\n54.9\n104.2\n81.6\n62.5\n136,133\n148,147\n54","Appendix Table 10. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\nSample date: 05/18/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n134\n172.6\n36.5\n69.2\n170\n118.7\n59.0\n90.6\n165\n150.3\n46.3\n180.5\n157\n167.0\n116.8\n148.5\n146\n74.5\n60.2\n111.9\n144,136\n200.2\n53.5\n131.0\n132\n51.8\n52.2\n93.9\n133\n30.5\n81.4\n125.9\n145\n154.2\n41.3\n109.0\n134,133\n117.3\n83.7\n149.9\n155\n35.2\n46.6\n79.2\n148\n89.7\n60.5\n99.2\n150\n90.3\n60.6\n126.2\n153\n139.3\n92.9\n149.3\n149\n76.1\n115.5\n87.6\n155,137\n26.8\n74.9\n107.5\n152\n12.6\n57.3\n91.0\n135,141\n37.9\n77.8\n88.1\n150\n30.3\n51.1\n112.4\n151\n55.0\n67.6\n71.3\n157\n76.1\n56.0\n128.0\n141\n107.4\n94.3\n76.9\n148,148\n78.1\n52.5\n65.8\n147\n65.9\n78.0\n97.9\n155\n99.0\n72.5\n108.7\n145,143\n170.0\n85.7\n67.2\n146\n65.6\n77.7\n113.6\n223\n108.8\n76.0\n79.3\n154,130\n69.7\n62.7\n86.9\n132,139\n47.7\n97.8\n63.7\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n164\n199.4\n55.5\n53.9\n152,138\n47.5\n112.5\n--\n150,162\n93.4\n77.0\n129.7\n143,146\n47.7\n102.4\n193.1\n145\n56.5\n40.9\n143\n148.2\n35.2\n82.5\n--\n136\n191.3\n59.3\n129.2\n144\n158.4\n104.5\n85.7\n136,130\n81.1\n76.4\n101.4\n133,136\n250.7\n73.4\n37.4\n152\n69.6\n62.4\n133.4\n140,124\n18.6\n67.8\n138.6\n135,142\n15.9\n88.2\n70.3\n132,137\n181.8\n81.4\n94.3\n130,153\n146.5\n52.9\n116.1\n160\n53.9\n58.5\n137,136\n31.8\n89.2\n64.0\n128,135\n20.6\n68.6\n73.3\n142,131\n45.1\n72.2\n47.6\n151\n115.4\n66.8\n73.0\n131,138\n39.6\n83.3\n95.8\n161\n155.0\n83.0\n52.8\n154,127\n29.0\n75.0\n82.7\n155\n18.3\n86.3\n106.5\n154\n30.4\n40.7\n101.3\n134,127\n134.5\n102.9\n64.5\n136\n114.7\n4.2\n84.5\n136,132,129\n230.9\n142.7\n67.6\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n140,132\n172.4\n36.3\n114.1\n147\n256.3\n136\n62.7\n99.2\n140\n31.5\n29.1\n107.2\n134\n50.5\n69.8\n49.0\n147\n97.1\n35.9\n82.5\n150,126\n25.3\n87.9\n58.0\n134\n16.8\n35.6\n108.2\n143,125\n120.1\n57.1\n101.4\n153\n76.7\n40.6\n115.1\n142\n17.2\n76.6\n78.1\n129,138\n125.4\n51.2\n125.7\n141,140\n58.7\n64.1\n60.7\n165\n155.9\n--\n164\n44.1\n57.3\n104.3\n155\n61.5\n42.1\n121.3\n151\n48.9\n72.2\n145.0\n143,130\n237.5\n57.9\n97.7\n166\n478.6\n63.8\n88.5\n149\n14.7\n61.8\n87.4\n138,148\n66.4\n71.6\n87.5\n140,140\n108.8\n114.6\n43.3\n132,144\n80.6\n95.2\n89.8\n146,134\n67.4\n57.6\n70.5\n178\n131.3\n97.8\n42.4\n156\n33.8\n58.0\n91.1\n136,127\n130.8\n91.1\n45.2\n144,138\n121.3\n73.0\n39.7\n146\n56.7\n91.8\n63.1\n130,135\n45.8\n84.5\n66.5\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n146\n124.7\n26.5\n94.5\n138\n135.6\n46.3\n144.1\n149\n178.2\n43.5\n85.7\n143\n86.1\n27.8\n72.0\n141\n129.0\n52.1\n126.9\n159\n35.9\n50.0\n118.3\n140,139\n133.3\n42.8\n105.9\n137\n229.4\n35.9\n93.4\n160\n166.8\n39.4\n92.3\n148\n141.2\n60.4\n153.2\n141\n24.4\n41.4\n86.6\n124,143\n57.5\n64.1\n133.2\n143,138\n29.8\n49.1\n96.5\n154\n133.8\n76.6\n157.5\n147\n145.3\n50.4\n101.0\n139\n85.4\n52.1\n103.4\n143\n36.6\n63.0\n69.9\n132,119\n91.2\n78.7\n95.5\n138,132\n48.9\n68.2\n80.7\n142,127\n187.4\n60.3\n71.3\n142\n76.9\n53.7\n49.9\n138,139\n79.2\n69.0\n88.3\n138,140\n108.8\n67.2\n107.1\n143,139\n50.5\n60.7\n70.2\n133,140\n85.8\n84.1\n134.6\n135,127\n94.9\n79.1\n43.4\n140,138\n83.1\n93.3\n58.3\n140,133\n37.0\n76.6\n63.5\n139,122\n67.9\n58.4\n143,134\n50.4\n89.4\n83.2\n--\n55","Fork lengths, plasma cortisol, lactate, and glucose values for migrating juvenile\nAppendix Table 11.\nsteelhead collected from various locations and times at McNary Dam's collection\nfacility, 1994.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact\nGluc.\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\nSample date: 05/10/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n199\n105.2\n43.3\n210.3\n201\n136.1\n46.5\n79.4\n232\n22.9\n39.5\n93.1\n217\n55.6\n26.5\n64.6\n240\n160.7\n56.3\n133.2\n183\n136.1\n66.8\n112.1\n227\n14.2\n50.1\n167.4\n201\n30.2\n85.7\n--\n215\n158.4\n58.6\n99.5\n224\n92.0\n54.7\n150.7\n231\n112.5\n62.2\n124.0\n237\n19.7\n72.6\n105.3\n213\n13.6\n39.9\n74.6\n220\n42.6\n37.9\n121.8\n210\n54.6\n76.9\n219\n45.6\n46.9\n83.6\n--\n203\n46.9\n67.2\n123.0\n231\n48.7\n59.8\n144.9\n208\n87.6\n85.3\n125.0\n236\n130.9\n182.1\n115.8\n221\n181.5\n75.3\n113.2\n280\n112.5\n63.6\n83.1\n203\n118.1\n68.5\n105.0\n214\n83.3\n62.2\n55.8\n173\n81.5\n64.2\n106.1\n253\n42.6\n54.4\n112.0\n196\n99.5\n72.8\n76.2\n205\n256.0\n48.0\n64.3\n218\n32.4\n79.1\n123.7\n234\n23.6\n58.1\n62.2\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n222\n170.5\n38.0\n105.9\n232\n155.0\n28.0\n546.5\n206\n83.2\n37.7\n118.5\n213\n150.8\n81.3\n518.6\n237\n92.2\n34.4\n106.3\n234\n79.1\n85.1\n103.0\n253\n16.1\n53.8\n127.5\n208\n116.8\n96.5\n88.5\n247\n123.5\n39.3\n184.8\n248\n176.6\n57.1\n117.1\n243\n126.4\n39.4\n134.0\n227\n84.7\n48.3\n93.1\n240\n25.2\n26.1\n87.5\n220\n200.7\n46.6\n115.3\n248\n68.4\n48.0\n170.3\n220\n180.1\n53.1\n90.8\n204\n21.5\n75.5\n121.9\n241\n70.3\n106.1\n62.5\n228\n41.1\n96.3\n228\n76.8\n69.2\n113.6\n--\n231\n154.0\n75.0\n88.0\n227\n111.6\n82.7\n80.1\n223\n30.1\n52.8\n47.3\n216\n43.9\n44.6\n106.4\n225\n158.6\n97.0\n86.4\n200\n210.5\n75.7\n100.2\n179\n105.3\n58.5\n90.1\n238\n46.3\n77.6\n152.6\n221\n17.4\n99.4\n53.3\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n216\n66.2\n38.8\n155.2\n245\n38.1\n30.3\n106.0\n213\n89.4\n46.3\n114.1\n252\n167.1\n78.4\n93.0\n224\n141.2\n107.6\n64.2\n255\n250.0\n73.7\n376.1\n232\n200.4\n42.6\n122.9\n200\n27.7\n49.3\n171.1\n238\n34.3\n65.0\n79.0\n231\n156.2\n41.3\n110.8\n215\n104.4\n115.4\n190.1\n221\n39.4\n36.1\n88.0\n253\n48.5\n73.1\n178.4\n220\n73.8\n22.1\n83.2\n265\n89.3\n97.2\n82.6\n256\n64.3\n77.1\n142.3\n218\n39.6\n49.3\n93.7\n214\n16.0\n48.4\n176.9\n236\n55.2\n44.6\n76.7\n266\n15.0\n52.4\n101.6\n218\n94.5\n73.1\n98.0\n226\n15.9\n81.3\n141.3\n196\n73.2\n79.8\n83.8\n222\n40.2\n43.3\n91.7\n195\n260.2\n91.7\n144.0\n233\n28.3\n47.5\n93.7\n189\n77.1\n83.7\n154.6\n250\n198.1\n52.4\n132.2\n190\n255.0\n90.7\n383.0\n208,195\n19.8\n--\n--\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n194\n144.3\n32.0\n115.3\n214\n13.5\n55.4\n146.5\n208\n55.0\n43.4\n95.4\n240\n72.3\n51.9\n130.7\n235\n88.6\n31.4\n386.2\n188\n196.0\n97.1\n128.6\n205\n42.7\n65.7\n165.6\n205\n21.2\n31.0\n90.9\n210\n71.6\n45.2\n175.5\n196\n169.1\n75.8\n138.5\n204\n74.3\n39.7\n123.3\n210\n19.9\n74.6\n57.2\n222\n35.2\n58.1\n182.7\n267\n42.2\n49.2\n115.6\n228\n107.2\n46.9\n244.7\n223\n131.7\n79.3\n178.9\n198\n226.1\n70.0\n151.6\n220\n28.4\n72.6\n143.7\n235\n37.5\n40.3\n94.8\n247\n176.4\n61.8\n128.0\n208\n92.7\n107.4\n118.2\n231\n129.0\n64.4\n96.0\n187\n55.3\n47.4\n138.6\n219\n117.0\n69.3\n105.3\n205\n29.4\n52.2\n161.6\n234\n96.2\n67.9\n83.3\n206\n120.5\n76.4\n144.0\n223\n121.0\n54.2\n93.0\n200\n14.9\n76.1\n127.6\n196\n108.3\n61.8\n80.8\n56","Appendix Table 11. Continued.\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl) (mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mm)\nSample date: 05/12/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n34.5\n110.9\n270\n103.8\n46.5\n158.1\n214\n120.8\n56.7\n73.7\n210\n140.8\n59.9\n208\n41.4\n92.9\n176.6\n220\n89.1\n50.0\n118.4\n223\n44.7\n55.4\n66.3\n34.1\n246\n29.5\n35.3\n96.9\n216\n98.6\n201\n52.1\n65.2\n254.7\n213\n83.4\n31.4\n65.8\n229\n28.8\n35.7\n125.1\n244\n44.2\n30.1\n120.8\n236\n18.4\n59.6\n245.2\n202\n9.1\n30.4\n101.1\n95.8\n220\n161.9\n509.0\n256\n12.4\n35.0\n81.5\n57.6\n222\n63.6\n151.1\n253\n85.3\n90.9\n141.9\n244\n40.5\n65.4\n134.8\n232\n117.4\n107.8\n--\n42.3\n25.0\n95.3\n203\n88.5\n72.7\n213.1\n232\n224\n83.1\n61.0\n93.7\n218\n35.2\n50.7\n114.3\n213\n93.7\n73.6\n118.1\n251\n11.1\n78.7\n105.9\n240\n46.3\n46.2\n134.9\n218\n65.6\n96.9\n--\n64.6\n32.3\n227.3\n211\n12.0\n83.2\n212\n20.0\nRaceway 0-hour\nSeparator\n42.9\n129.5\n235\n125.6\n92.7\n44.0\n239\n213.1\n98.8\n367.3\n246\n37.5\n23.9\n69.0\n233\n123.4\n117.5\n110.6\n215.9\n248\n79.0\n51.5\n110.8\n236\n29.6\n86.6\n103.4\n239\n229.8\n34.5\n143.5\n214\n142.3\n36.7\n88.5\n222\n20.8\n42.9\n157.3\n185\n35.0\n33.9\n140.9\n229\n111.0\n101.4\n104.8\n255\n253\n23.0\n71.6\n121.5\n191\n87.5\n107.0\n136.8\n208\n57.4\n57.4\n75.7\n216\n92.5\n79.5\n110.0\n262\n25.8\n46.6\n47.6\n258\n108.2\n46.6\n161.2\n48.8\n220\n110.3\n115.1\n231\n79.5\n69.3\n87.5\n215\n47.1\n67.0\n127.0\n232\n189.4\n62.2\n57.8\n223\n86.4\n116.6\n134.2\n253\n69.9\n72.8\n118.3\n220\n29.9\n90.6\n129.2\n236\n35.2\n55.9\n91.9\n217\n59.6\n63.8\n170.5\n256\n56.9\n43.3\n90.5\n221\n180.6\n52.2\n80.2\n214\n93.9\n53.2\n87.7\nRaceway 2-hour\nRacewav 4-hour\n243\n151.6\n52.2\n161.6\n204\n75.6\n42.1\n98.6\n249\n167.6\n63.6\n135.2\n255\n5.5\n29.4\n187.7\n287\n89.7\n36.8\n97.2\n244\n85.4\n43.5\n160.2\n220\n77.4\n32.9\n91.7\n235\n14.9\n28.8\n90.0\n201\n79.7\n78.2\n203.8\n254\n37.7\n76.7\n--\n243\n142.5\n30.7\n79.7\n282\n13.4\n36.2\n98.4\n230\n130.9\n59.6\n94.8\n240\n117.9\n50.7\n92.7\n220\n129.5\n47.2\n61.9\n218\n86.8\n40.0\n100.5\n226\n43.9\n57.0\n143.0\n233\n44.5\n97.7\n--\n146.5\n240\n218.7\n51.8\n134.1\n210\n25.5\n35.3\n51.9\n240\n144.9\n61.8\n127.9\n213\n34.6\n185.3\n44.9\n106.9\n220\n75.3\n64.4\n125.9\n232\n140.2\n177\n12.3\n86.9\n55.5\n270\n17.5\n48.7\n126.8\n208\n179.2\n63.0\n85.7\n214\n21.2\n97.4\n108.1\n66.8\n234\n88.1\n81.1\n236.7\n213\n83.9\n--\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n243\n24.2\n29.2\n89.4\n209\n54.8\n65.7\n352.6\n210\n89.7\n23.1\n102.2\n203\n150.9\n76.4\n96.9\n213\n154.8\n54.6\n132.0\n232\n31.1\n69.5\n391.4\n228\n36.6\n40.0\n93.0\n222\n77.6\n40.2\n117.1\n256\n8.2\n28.7\n125.0\n188\n109.8\n50.5\n231.8\n273\n60.7\n26.4\n133.0\n235\n5.5\n34.0\n105.4\n205\n51.3\n52.4\n135.2\n288\n109.5\n55.7\n104.8\n216\n133.2\n42.8\n112.0\n222\n129.5\n51.9\n144.3\n220\n39.7\n42.5\n97.0\n208\n37.5\n61.0\n134.0\n229\n8.9\n33.3\n111.7\n213\n23.2\n46.2\n71.8\n224\n45.1\n53.8\n108.3\n226\n97.6\n47.7\n111.6\n208\n60.1\n50.8\n153.4\n222\n20.9\n54.2\n243.6\n221\n32.0\n50.3\n158.5\n209\n52.9\n73.9\n105.4\n190\n59.0\n61.2\n123.1\n208\n17.2\n53.6\n61.4\n57","Appendix Table 11. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\nSample date: 05/17/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n244\n73.4\n162.4\n199\n171.7\n39.4\n79.4\n--\n254\n86.2\n47.5\n137.7\n188\n37.6\n52.3\n92.4\n218\n275.1\n49.1\n269.4\n239\n122.6\n24.3\n90.4\n241\n160.6\n44.8\n212.6\n215\n59.5\n54.3\n83.8\n224\n42.5\n135.0\n230\n81.3\n30.4\n101.0\n--\n188\n35.7\n75.8\n113.3\n260\n63.0\n36.8\n115.3\n227\n155.9\n52.9\n103.0\n247\n52.7\n29.7\n111.4\n189\n43.3\n57.9\n166.2\n224\n55.5\n31.2\n114.2\n228\n50.7\n150.5\n386.0\n235\n49.5\n43.2\n113.1\n194\n171.3\n67.8\n139.9\n207\n131.6\n42.7\n77.9\n212\n44.8\n122.6\n216.9\n255\n206.9\n123.9\n218.5\n179\n25.5\n62.1\n95.6\n268\n102.5\n39.7\n79.1\n221\n39.6\n77.4\n117.7\n217\n34.9\n77.2\n102.9\n189\n51.0\n76.8\n125.9\n224\n43.8\n36.6\n78.9\n270\n20.9\n69.4\n153.8\n261\n64.1\n48.1\n100.6\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n223\n174.7\n79.9\n66.2\n238\n133.3\n42.6\n137.6\n246\n126.2\n26.1\n96.0\n258\n79.5\n77.3\n79.6\n242\n92.1\n40.6\n72.4\n214\n136.5\n61.6\n77.2\n193\n60.2\n32.9\n103.6\n209\n228.7\n177.1\n130.7\n216\n62.6\n42.4\n128.6\n213\n46.0\n42.0\n140.7\n236\n36.6\n86.3\n109.0\n233\n212.3\n152.3\n83.2\n164\n192.2\n32.9\n72.7\n250\n99.5\n63.3\n110.8\n266\n33.8\n87.1\n125.3\n207\n78.1\n79.6\n68.6\n228\n76.9\n72.5\n109.3\n214\n46.2\n66.6\n63.8\n234\n49.2\n76.3\n75.6\n238\n78.5\n88.6\n91.3\n214\n109.6\n46.3\n131.6\n205\n145.9\n83.7\n161.7\n236\n95.8\n91.8\n138.9\n203\n58.9\n76.7\n74.9\n206\n57.1\n41.1\n83.1\n237\n46.6\n94.3\n88.8\n198\n109.5\n59.1\n80.9\n240\n70.1\n168.6\n--\n222\n69.7\n159.6\n115.9\n226\n72.2\n116.6\n136.5\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n255\n38.2\n43.0\n196.8\n261\n111.5\n41.0\n159.9\n223\n103.2\n90.6\n161.7\n185\n103.4\n51.0\n147.8\n248\n20.8\n43.3\n123.8\n195\n17.3\n7.6\n40.4\n220\n133.1\n25.6\n107.5\n280\n41.0\n167.3\n--\n240\n121.3\n84.5\n363.1\n238\n114.2\n57.0\n114.3\n210\n43.3\n23.3\n88.3\n188\n106.1\n59.9\n107.6\n228\n16.8\n50.7\n146.1\n217\n188.4\n48.2\n147.6\n203\n25.5\n40.2\n109.2\n217\n212.6\n80.4\n155.0\n222\n292.1\n100.7\n109.5\n208\n47.2\n46.2\n138.6\n213\n55.7\n56.6\n137.1\n215\n167.0\n33.7\n133.6\n230\n25.4\n79.3\n129.8\n206\n45.4\n46.2\n78.8\n186\n118.3\n93.7\n135.2\n220\n83.1\n67.3\n148.8\n249\n322.4\n91.2\n62.7\n182\n227.2\n95.8\n536.0\n187\n104.4\n106.1\n80.7\n209\n14.7\n51.3\n112.0\n244\n11.3\n64.4\n91.9\n195\n59.3\n86.9\n99.1\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n227\n155.0\n54.0\n40.3\n201\n223.3\n69.2\n132.4\n188\n110.1\n41.1\n149.9\n224\n25.8\n81.0\n356.0\n214\n130.6\n67.1\n122.5\n263\n79.3\n83.5\n71.9\n204\n40.8\n52.1\n93.1\n265\n120.0\n41.4\n108.9\n253\n129.6\n49.3\n66.8\n218\n187.4\n46.1\n274.2\n246\n52.6.\n59.5\n134.2\n236\n242.5\n120.4\n426.2\n258\n109.6\n59.5\n117.0\n220\n51.1\n110.2\n--\n253\n12.6\n59.5\n129.3\n225\n122.2\n57.0\n82.7\n185\n147.6\n81.0\n126.8\n227\n59.5\n89.2\n119.4\n218\n63.5\n39.5\n125.6\n180\n84.8\n75.1\n108.7\n246\n121.9\n43.4\n132.3\n215\n33.3\n53.4\n225.2\n53.6\n223\n71.0\n109.4\n195\n77.4\n52.8\n114.2\n214\n70.9\n57.4\n82.1\n226\n37.8\n-4.9\n11.9\n187\n25.3\n98.0\n149.9\n203\n163.7\n40.9\n97.0\n260\n87.5\n50.8\n91.3\n211\n106.7\n65.4\n156.7\n58","Appendix Table 11. Continued.\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mm)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\nSample date: 05/19/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n38.0\n126.4\n223\n207.2\n22.4\n96.5\n187\n67.5\n179\n15.6\n58.9\n401.0\n232\n13.3\n35.5\n146.9\n38.7\n115.4\n219\n49.1\n32.5\n105.4\n223\n--\n116.6\n18.3\n157.6\n198\n119.3\n40.9\n251.2\n231\n176\n50.2\n57.8\n202.0\n224\n135.6\n50.4\n291.8\n57.9\n18.9\n80.7\n187\n36.0\n41.3\n104.7\n234\n206\n51.3\n53.8\n184.1\n230\n85.9\n24.5\n115.9\n152.5\n210\n149.2\n51.2\n273.5\n209\n163.7\n48.9\n121.8\n85.2\n232\n114.0\n50.4\n214\n125.1\n19.3\n42.4\n85.2\n178\n154.7\n49.9\n135.4\n219\n118.6\n53.1\n108.9\n215\n176.1\n73.0\n88.9\n233\n33.0\n38.9\n72.0\n41.2\n89.0\n235\n65.9\n174\n256.3\n55.5\n165.5\n216\n51.6\n58.9\n115.6\n194\n190.3\n44.1\n25.3\n86.3\n219\n126.9\n72.8\n286.0\n226\n144.3\n27.9\n113.7\n222\n62.8\n62.4\n113.5\n206\nRaceway 0-hour\nSeparator\n217.6\n55.9\n76.0\n40.3\n57.9\n233\n78.6\n200\n248\n59.7\n30.4\n137.2\n213\n42.9\n57.1\n165.1\n215\n157.5\n27.4\n153.6\n222\n72.2\n34.8\n110.7\n291\n178.8\n35.0\n165.2\n220\n164.5\n61.0\n100.1\n245\n29.5\n57.8\n115.1\n206\n52.3\n50.0\n99.2\n199\n99.4\n22.0\n82.1\n270\n238.7\n61.8\n116.3\n78.6\n68.1\n226\n110.3\n127.1\n153.8\n191\n92.9\n214\n109.7\n53.6\n171.5\n199\n70.6\n47.8\n128.0\n202\n68.4\n95.6\n75.0\n232\n78.1\n53.0\n26.2\n140.3\n185\n88.1\n60.3\n123.7\n208\n79.1\n64.5\n139.0\n265\n87.9\n66.8\n127.6\n271\n68.6\n131.7\n143.1\n210\n57.6\n36.9\n100.4\n220\n98.3\n36.5\n98.6\n211\n78.2\n96.7\n235\n41.8\n81.6\n--\n141.8\n102.0\n189\n99.5\n31.2\n89.7\n247\n100.4\n106.9\n196.4\n212\n151.0\n25.7\n94.2\n230\n141.6\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n225\n51.9\n43.5\n116.1\n217\n137.8\n34.5\n143.1\n207\n249.1\n63.3\n313.0\n96.1\n235\n33.1\n84.5\n247\n130.6\n84.5\n115.8\n214\n230.6\n93.3\n151.9\n232\n216.3\n76.3\n604.5\n175,196\n117.7\n74.5\n89.9\n213\n28.9\n93.5\n229\n71.1\n64.9\n104.3\n--\n234\n54.5\n26.7\n115.9\n280\n63.1\n71.7\n192.5\n219\n46.8\n51.0\n129.3\n252\n256.3\n119.0\n128.5\n213\n75.0\n35.9\n253.4\n203\n71.2\n50.3\n206.3\n254\n30.0\n41.5\n131.6\n227\n79.2\n78.2\n122.4\n245\n58.7\n90.4\n85.6\n240\n49.2\n79.8\n151.3\n205\n147.5\n75.5\n108.6\n199\n27.4\n109.5\n76.7\n250\n182.5\n44.9\n79.1\n215\n51.9\n99.1\n119.3\n54.5\n184\n71.5\n81.3\n227,194\n88.1\n84.6\n79.6\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n203\n35.4\n45.1\n105.9\n232\n220.2\n94.6\n71.6\n212\n90.9\n35.0\n118.9\n210\n184.9\n73.2\n288.1\n187\n72.3\n39.8\n93.8\n253\n64.1\n96.3\n390.7\n220\n43.9\n44.5\n172.9\n201\n68.0\n48.1\n367.1\n286\n273.4\n33.5\n125.9\n245\n46.4\n57.3\n211.0\n255\n67.3\n48.1\n159.6\n257\n171.1\n81.4\n292.6\n235\n114.2\n59.9\n88.6\n255\n50.8\n96.5\n480.6\n238\n46.9\n50.0\n85.2\n203\n101.1\n58.7\n160.3\n77.3\n142.5\n201\n186.5\n210\n171.1\n54.3\n231.1\n226\n118.5\n38.3\n102.2\n223\n156.2\n79.5\n105.9\n244\n15.0\n57.2\n71.6\n175\n111.7\n96.1\n168.2\n218\n16.6\n70.4\n107.5\n166\n212.9\n67.0\n58.5\n208\n12.4\n61.9\n161.6\n236\n98.2\n56.3\n100.3\n239\n178.8\n52.4\n176.3\n246\n122.0\n69.1\n176.5\n221\n13.9\n55.4\n80.8\n236\n43.5\n90.6\n122.1\n59","Appendix Table 12.\nFork lengths, plasma cortisol, lactate, and glucose values for migrating subyearling\nchinook salmon collected from various locations and times at McNary Dam's collection\nfacility, 1994.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\nSample date: 06/27/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n111,103\n51.0\n84.8\n124.9\n112,111\n133.8\n39.6\n69.6\n84,107,105\n51.1\n78.9\n98.1\n111,107,92\n151.3\n64.4\n94.2\n99,105\n54.6\n97.6\n87.0\n108,103\n88.7\n95.4\n74.7\n110,116\n84.9\n89.8\n85.8\n102,110,109\n18.5\n71.2\n45.8\n101,103,99\n11.3\n103.7\n80.6\n104,108\n36.0\n81.8\n62.6\n100,118,99\n14.2\n77.8\n99.8\n107,101\n126.8\n81.7\n55.8\n98,111,110\n17.2\n140.7\n101.0\n112.105.93.108\n64.3\n84.2\n74.7\n101,108,108\n71.5\n180.3\n109.2\n108,107,102\n36.5\n114.2\n87.4\n109,109\n26.0\n120.9\n122.5\n89.96.81,112\n68.4\n95.4\n71.9\n104,83,107\n41.2\n163.8\n102.0\n102,107,108\n117.7\n54.3\n67.2\n105,96,100\n147.0\n176.5\n63.0\n109,100\n96.5\n75.0\n61.9\n108,103,102\n47.4\n77.8\n64.8\n105,110,96\n81.7\n87.2\n61.2\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n102,104\n45.7\n50.2\n120.7\n103,103\n155.4\n141.1\n99.6\n106,106\n93.9\n54.2\n79.9\n102,101,107\n48.4\n90.5\n150.4\n100,104\n40.0\n82.9\n80.0\n114,104\n55.7\n101.4\n101.6\n95,102,97\n129.0\n63.7\n93.6\n112,104,101,95\n147.1\n91.3\n59.6\n103,108\n54.0\n92.8\n74.7\n108,108\n54.5\n99.9\n116.5\n104.106.105\n45.2\n97.1\n78.1\n101,111,115\n48.5\n181.1\n59.5\n110,105\n65.6\n90.2\n84.2\n97,109,114\n67.9\n131.3\n91.8\n102,104,108,103\n32.2\n97.1\n56.4\n103,100,108\n67.9\n86.8\n36.9\n105,111\n53.6\n130.2\n62.4\n108,106,106\n131.5\n136.2\n41.4\n104,110,108\n64.0\n141.9\n36.0\n103.103.102.98\n133.8\n154.0\n34.8\n98,106,102,104\n20.0\n129.0\n58.9\n105,98,101\n88.3\n126.9\n48.6\n109,100\n34.9\n107.2\n59.6\n102,108,101\n18.2\n142.1\n24.9\n101,108,104\n59.8\n136.8\n47.7\n104,96,99,94\n87.0\n139.9\n35.4\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n99,101,100\n48.7\n42.2\n151.8\n108,98,101\n79.7\n44.5\n96.0\n109,100,104\n118.6\n38.2\n118.8\n99,115\n81.8\n44.0\n92.4\n104,108,104\n54.1\n114.5\n52.7\n95,109,103\n55.1\n58.8\n120.1\n107,112,104\n46.9\n54.2\n47.6\n113,109\n168.2\n49.4\n109.2\n96,110,102\n71.5\n126.0\n99,101,109,105\n63.6\n75.5\n88.4\n--\n105,103,108\n147.8\n67.3\n57.6\n106,99,104,104\n40.5\n64.4\n126.0\n105,105,100.97\n10.2\n105.1\n50.3\n109,120\n50.4\n101.1\n82.3\n105,106,101\n56.7\n94.9\n53.3\n102,104,103,112\n75.3\n93.6\n55.8\n106,108,101\n36.0\n108.5\n84.3\n100,106,106,110\n167.7\n90.9\n57.6\n106,107,102\n103.7\n96.0\n43.0\n114,110,95\n50.0\n102.9\n52.0\n110,107,102\n163.6\n98.1\n50.4\n105,111,107\n55.7\n118.4\n50.6\n111,91,108\n49.2\n144.1\n38.5\n104,101,107\n25.2\n124.5\n41.6\n112,112,89\n27.7\n123.9\n29.2\n102,93,99,100\n50.5\n120.3\n54.0\n112,105,94,92\n35.8\n128.6\n40.4\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n105,107,106\n59.0\n42.2\n125.8\n107,109\n78.1\n50.7\n117.1\n104,104,104\n125.9\n41.4\n117.6\n105,106,106\n114.7\n49.9\n91.3\n103,105,108\n35.0\n48.9\n112.8\n111,112\n194.8\n68.4\n130.2\n108,98,111\n43.0\n52.5\n105.8\n105,93,110\n101.3\n71.2\n84.7\n101.99.112, 89\n46.0\n100.108.111\n140.7\n75.1\n81.0\n97,99,103\n72.3\n73.1\n57.0\n112,101,110,98\n176.9\n73.1\n74.4\n101.100.98,102\n77.3\n88.3\n79.8\n113,100,105\n--\n--\n--\n105,108,108\n88.7\n83.3\n87.0\n106,101,114\n70.9\n101.6\n--\n107,103,101\n133.5\n114.6\n54.6\n102,104,104,109\n37.1\n122.2\n88.6\n111,108,109\n76.3\n102.3\n45.8\n106,101,107,108\n37.5\n114.7\n67.8\n108,99,97\n21.0\n111.4\n54.6\n103,91,109\n92.5\n106.3\n44.0\n103,101\n65.1\n105.7\n54.4\n114,97,111\n200.8\n129.2\n57.6\n99,105,105\n146.3\n121.5\n42.6\n60","Appendix Table 12. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(ng/ml)\n(mm)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\nSample date: 06/28/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n112,108\n211.6\n160.4\n83.4\n112,113,96\n121.2\n97.1\n107.4\n114,109\n34.9\n87.7\n120.1\n115,100\n73.3\n58.7\n123.0\n95,110\n29.4\n67.5\n95.4\n93,102,104\n66.0\n68.1\n113.0\n114,105,97\n45.7\n116.7\n99.3\n104,103\n40.5\n117.8\n54.1\n108,96,96\n51.7\n141.1\n178.9\n105,110\n161.8\n52.0\n105.6\n108,114,98\n42.8\n90.2\n95.5\n106,100,116\n121.6\n62.3\n79.9\n95,105,102,116\n157.9\n183.1\n97.8\n108,104,108\n69.3\n69.5\n89.9\n110,100,113\n19.8\n144.1\n99.8\n106,107,105\n89.8\n45.3\n86.1\n100,107,104\n15.9\n116.8\n75.0\n106,105\n41.0\n74.6\n129.6\n78,112,111\n64.2\n113.2\n65.7\n104,103\n45.8\n78.0\n126.0\n100,108,103\n44.6\n101.3\n134.4\n101,103,105\n40.7\n138.5\n81.6\n105,94,99\n29.4\n128.2\n110.3\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n106,106\n115.3\n43.7\n92.4\n104,109\n71.6\n96.3\n144.3\n117,109\n50.6\n57.0\n124.3\n91,100,102,114\n94.7\n56.3\n85.2\n104,97\n81.0\n60.3\n86.1\n109 109\n110.8\n66.1\n109.2\n106,102\n117.0\n66.6\n67.6\n103,105,101.98\n172.0\n69.0\n70.8\n103,101,98\n53.0\n106.5\n115.2\n102,108,105\n42.2\n125.5\n136.7\n98,106\n99.8\n66.3\n71.9\n107,105,107,106\n108.1\n122.6\n58.8\n110,107\n153.0\n52.9\n94.2\n106,105,100\n119.2\n116.1\n60.0\n104,100\n124.4\n73.9\n82.8\n105,100,103\n204.5\n124.1\n34.2\n98,104\n67.0\n111.9\n111.5\n102,110,99\n61.1\n114.1\n78.5\n99,103,102\n54.9\n71.8\n70.9\n97,102,94\n31.3\n174.9\n32.9\n103,102,105\n78.4\n74.1\n81.3\n102,96,104\n81.4\n129.3\n39.7\n110,100\n135.2\n47.7\n97.8\n105,107,101\n51.8\n70.4\n86.8\n106,106\n--\n--\n119,110\n184.2\n87.8\n112.2\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n106,103\n58.2\n36.0\n123.7\n108,108\n68.0\n27.8\n99.0\n112,102\n40.5\n41.1\n92.3\n111.101.101\n38.6\n53.3\n100.4\n106.103.101\n43.3\n52.4\n115.2\n110,113\n224.8\n41.7\n97.8\n105,97,109,101\n138.4\n51.4\n77.6\n104,106,99\n41.9\n54.7\n88.0\n104,117.99\n132.8\n81.6\n77.1\n106,106,107\n57.2\n55.4\n94.1\n106,107,112\n95.1\n92.2\n109.4\n111,109,106\n38.8\n68.4\n101.1\n105,114,101\n49.0\n112.5\n58.9\n103,110,103,105\n215.7\n81.4\n81.6\n105,106,104\n173.9\n88.3\n56.4\n75,102,114,95\n27.9\n84.0\n96.3\n108,113,98\n76.7\n91.1\n53.4\n104,104,112\n34.5\n88.0\n53.3\n109,104,99\n45.4\n99.0\n108.2\n93,106,103,94\n70.3\n92.8\n79.0\n101,101,106\n92.8\n103.1\n44.4\n106,114,105\n105.9\n111.4\n57.0\n105,100,104\n12.5\n104.8\n34.8\n97,92,86\n127.4\n117.4\n63.0\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n109,103,105\n44.7\n41.9\n117.1\n107,107\n121.6\n51.4\n141.9\n109,102,101,100\n39.3\n39.6\n106.8\n97,118,98\n56.7\n48.7\n118.3\n113,113,110\n137.9\n54.3\n114.0\n116,114\n46.3\n53.9\n125.8\n104,105,102\n94.5\n66.4\n85.8\n100,111,104,108\n38.8\n57.6\n138.5\n108.106.105\n48.7\n63.8\n81.8\n112,102,112\n31.9\n54.2\n91.1\n108,105,109,108\n95,97,94,108,106\n30.1\n84.6\n--\n--\n88.0\n99,110,102\n87.9\n75.8\n67.1\n108,100,105\n119.7\n75.9\n76.2\n104,105,105,104\n46.6\n104.2\n69.0\n109,101,110.98\n135.9\n92.4\n87.6\n101,110,100,100,110\n27.9\n111,4\n54.0\n104,103,100\n72.5\n100.7\n66.6\n109,104.98\n38.3\n110.5\n58.3\n110,114\n76.8\n88.2\n65.7\n107,101,101,108\n175.4\n117.7\n54.0\n107,108,108\n32.0\n120.8\n54.6\n61","Appendix Table 12. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\nSample date: 06/29/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n(No samples were taken at this site)\n133\n21.7\n59.8\n79.7\n113,105,101\n46.5\n79.8\n93.6\n97,104,108\n143.3\n81.4\n86.4\n98,106,114,100,9\n50.1\n109.7\n78.0\n108,107,98,105,10\n39.1\n130.2\n66.7\n101,104,101,9 97,110\n53.7\n141.3\n87.4\n103,86,101,106,97\n40.2\n134.4\n51.0\n110,103,102\n8.8\n133.9\n94.8\n105,102,107, 93, 105\n20.4\n137.9\n61.5\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n100,103,119\n47.6\n48.2\n112.1\n101,98,102\n199.5\n62.9\n95.1\n102.97.111,104\n50.4\n58.7\n109.7\n99,97,105\n108.1\n79.4\n97.8\n114,102\n104.7\n81.1\n97.8\n111,117\n30.0\n88.6\n99.8\n106,101,102\n131.5\n76.8\n99.6\n104,106,105,110\n51.3\n69.2\n62.0\n103,106,105,111\n121.2\n105.2\n90.8\n107,111,115\n101.3\n140.5\n68.1\n100.105.109\n61.9\n66.4\n100.5\n107,107,106\n149.4\n80.6\n45.0\n112,101\n105.6\n52.8\n104.5\n113,119,115\n20.5\n143.3\n76.9\n112,109,108\n69.9\n52.5\n107.8\n106,108,105\n81.0\n142.0\n69.0\n135.1\n70.5\n101,108,97\n109.0\n51.7\n81.8\n104,99,103,115\n85.4\n113,107\n79.2\n64.0\n89.4\n106,106,95,105\n118.3\n149.4\n61.9\n103,109,97\n85.8\n53.5\n81.6\n105,113,101\n29.5\n151.5\n34.0\n105,113,100\n25.4\n76.3\n74.9\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n104,106,105\n80.3\n44.8\n127.8\n112,117\n58.4\n33.7\n137.3\n99.98.105,104\n40.5\n49.9\n148.0\n101,103,115\n45.8\n36.0\n94.5\n108,113\n64.0\n72.1\n120.8\n112,99\n109.3\n41.0\n93.6\n114,105,104\n190.8\n74.5\n100.2\n99,104,107,104\n52.0\n54.4\n94.8\n109,108,101\n24.4\n61.3\n82.1\n109,109,112\n--\n--\n99,106,109,100\n118.3\n88.3\n72.6\n110,100,105,100\n143.7\n75.4\n72.0\n105,110,114\n15.8\n92.3\n60.8\n119,113\n57.9\n82.6\n63.9\n109,108,109\n60.1\n91.9\n100.5\n106,97\n19.2\n88.0\n57.7\n106,104,111,100\n65.1\n104.4\n91.6\n104,98,104,106\n126.8\n83.9\n66.2\n109,110,106\n133.5\n105.9\n52.2\n107,106,100,107,99\n35.0\n111.1\n68.8\n104,98,106,104,107\n45.5\n105.4\n49.6\n94,96,96,106\n124.7\n98.1\n46.8\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n120.0\n109,101\n64.0\n44.2\n107.2\n105,110,113\n114.2\n37.3\n103,102,108\n56.7\n45.9\n111.5\n102,109,101,102\n125.0\n44.8\n111.0\n112,108,109\n35.6\n59.0\n141.8\n107,109,109\n77.4\n51.7\n109.3\n110,109,99,108\n97.3\n63.2\n103.6\n105,107,112\n80.9\n62.0\n86.1\n108,113,100,11\n40.1\n70.7\n85.5\n118,105,102\n39.3\n78.0\n79.1\n102,108,91,114\n85.0\n71.5\n68.6\n101,101,100,101,106,104\n40.7\n92.9\n64.5\n110,120,108\n31.8\n84.8\n40.4\n107,105,104,107\n88.5\n94.2\n77.1\n100,92,110,105,100, 118\n21.1\n96.6\n55.8\n107,106,106\n101.1\n99.6\n72.6\n105,111,110\n62.8\n96.2\n47.3\n104,102,109,103,98\n47.1\n109.7\n65.1\n112,109\n62.4\n97.4\n44.9\n62","Appendix Table 12. Continued.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\nFork Length\nCortisol\nLact.\nGluc.\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mg/dl)\n(mm)\n(ng/ml)\nSample date: 06/30/94\nGatewell 7B\nPost Dewaterer\n108,109,104\n114.1\n68.1\n93.6\n(No samples were taken at this site)\n109.101.101\n108.2\n52.5\n97.4\n112,109\n75.3\n150.2\n83.2\n98,104,110\n115.4\n155.5\n107.8\n113,95,103\n70.7\n172.2\n93.0\n115,93,104.97\n54.7\n104.6\n87.0\n109,105,107,100\n42.3\n165.0\n70.9\n105,115,113,107,1\n36.4\n164.9\n88.0\n107,107,115\n28.0\n195.9\n131.4\n103,100,104,100,91\n44.0\n141.7\n71.9\nSeparator\nRaceway 0-hour\n107,100,103\n115.7\n58.8\n97.4\n105,115\n29.0\n92.6\n81.8\n99,99,103.99\n84.6\n71.2\n84.2\n107,94,102,104\n112.9\n86.7\n101.2\n98,103,110\n37.0\n104.2\n79.1\n100,111,107\n81.8\n75.4\n104.4\n108.95.103.94\n47.1\n100.3\n104.1\n122,114,99\n37.8\n73.5\n88.0\n105,98,92.94\n75.6\n122.1\n77.1\n121,110\n142.2\n75.7\n66.6\n107,106\n80.4\n64.4\n110.3\n104,101,105,104\n53.9\n126.7\n63.3\n105,101,103\n77.2\n59.8\n105.3\n107,103,104,101\n30.3\n90.6\n69.4\n107,109,105\n35.9\n63.0\n76.7\n102,114\n28.1\n101.4\n38.5\n103,102\n49.2\n58.1\n83.2\n102,105,106,105\n76.0\n130.4\n56.4\n110,97\n77.2\n63.5\n101.0\n115,108,111\n30.1\n154.9\n86.1\n112,108,104\n70.7\n88.5\n113.0\n123,102,109\n50.4\n164.9\n99.1\n103,102\n48.7\n62.7\n80.3\n98,108,99\n95.5\n151.4\n40.8\nRaceway 2-hour\nRaceway 4-hour\n110,105\n75.4\n43.6\n148.0\n104,110\n53.3\n40.2\n84.4\n105,103,102\n26.1\n44.5\n39.8\n101,108,104,112\n140.0\n44.2\n91.8\n107,117\n50.4\n49.6\n120.1\n108,115,110\n85.4\n55.7\n114.0\n106,109,92,106\n36.0\n49.3\n69.0\n115.99,111,102\n109.9\n59.4\n89.9\n109,105,112,112\n112.6\n82.0\n81.6\n106,110\n75.7\n71.0\n78.0\n105,109,110,109\n71.6\n81.9\n72.3\n111,113,114\n140.7\n74.8\n89.4\n106.114.100.98\n40.8\n97.4\n99.8\n108,115,97.107\n62.1\n107.4\n71.9\n97.118,104,108\n16.9\n119.1\n67.0\n104,102,110,108\n34.6\n97.1\n73.1\n114,106\n25.9\n94.3\n66.3\n109,111,108,108\n40.3\n95.1\n62.4\n107,106,97\n23.9\n111.8\n89.8\n108,117,109\n27.5\n116.1\n92.2\n98,115,90\n41.0\n127.5\n69.6\n104.105.107.95\n32.9\n116.7\n108.2\nRaceway 6-hour\nRaceway 10-hour\n110,111\n49.9\n48.2\n123.9\n108,106,105,120\n55.5\n66.1\n185.2\n105,106,109\n167.7\n48.0\n119.4\n100,97,111,110,111\n148.4\n84.2\n98.4\n109,104,108\n46.9\n52.4\n127.6\n106,112,115,113,9\n50.4\n105.1\n102.9\n106,101,107,11\n38.2\n61.0\n98.1\n108,109,115,101,102\n90.7\n104.9\n79.0\n109,111,103\n134.0\n77.8\n83.2\n101,102,112,107,99,1\n125.6\n109.9\n81.6\n102,112,106,113\n56.7\n96.9\n104.1\n116,96,96,98,87,100\n36.5\n135.4\n68.1\n102,114,107\n120.8\n111.7\n119.4\n101,106,104,107,109\n33.9\n125.8\n81.5\n113,108,106\n66.0\n99.1\n48.2\n105,105,108,102\n31.0\n114.7\n105.8\n106,109,100,106\n172.0\n115.7\n77.4\n103,104,108\n40.9\n121.3\n70.7\n63","The number of PIT-tagged fish passing through the flume,\nAppendix Table 13.\nthe number caught in the sampling system, the measured\nsample rate, the facility sample rate, and the expected\nnumber of fish caught in the sample for each day at\nMcNary Dam, 1994 (Objective 2)\nTotal\nMeasured\nDaily\nnumber\nTotal in\nsample\nsample\nExpected\nvalue\nDate\ndetected\nsample\nrate\nrate\nSmall-fish flume:\n04/17/94\n134\n5\n3.73\n5\n6.70\n04/30/94\n24\n2\n8.33\n5\n1.20\n3.60\n05/01/94\n72\n3\n4.17\n5\n6.67\n5\n8.25\n05/02/94\n165\n11\n3.54\n05/03/94\n254\n9\n5\n12.70\n3\n8.07\n05/04/94\n269\n3\n1.12\n05/05/94\n272\n4\n1.47\n2\n5.44\n8.10\n05/06/94\n405\n9\n2.22\n2\n05/07/94\n358\n5\n1.40\n2\n7.16\n6.98\n05/08/94\n349\n9\n2.58\n2\n2\n11.62\n05/09/94\n581\n15\n2.58\n05/10/94\n680\n13\n1.91\n2\n13.60\n05/11/94\n1000\n17\n1.70\n2\n20.00\n2.87\n2\n05/12/94\n697\n20\n13.94\n1.99\n25.16\n05/13/94\n1258\n25\n2\n05/14/94\n1150\n17\n1.48\n2\n23.00\n05/15/94\n1121\n21\n1.87\n2\n22.42\n17.12\n05/16/94\n856\n18\n2.10\n2\n31.72\n1.77\n2\n05/17/94\n1586\n28\n05/18/94\n1633\n56\n3.43\n2\n32.66\n05/19/94\n758\n5\n0.66\n2\n15.16\n05/22/94\n900\n16\n1.78\n2\n18.00\n12.28\n05/23/94\n614\n8\n1.30\n2\n05/24/94\n554\n17\n3.07\n2\n11.08\n05/25/94\n386\n6\n1.55\n2\n7.72\n2\n4.78\n05/26/94\n239\n1\n0.42\n05/27/94\n584\n11\n1.88\n2\n11.68\n4.98\n05/28/94\n249\n5\n2.01\n2\n1.35\n2\n2.96\n05/31/94\n148\n2\n4.68\n06/01/94\n156\n2\n1.28\n3\n3\n5.85\n06/02/94\n195\n8\n4.10\n06/03/94\n119\n4\n3.36\n4\n4.76\n1\n1.43\n4\n2.80\n06/04/94\n70\n2.08\n4\n1.92\n06/05/94\n48\n1\n1.52\n06/06/94\n38\n3\n7.89\n4\n4.02\n4\n7.96\n06/09/94\n199\n8\n06/10/94\n58\n1\n1.72\n4\n2.32\n3\n4.48\n4\n2.68\n06/11/94\n67\n06/12/94\n26\n0\n0.00\n5\n1.30\n11.76\n1.70\n06/13/94\n34\n4\n5\n5\n1.70\n06/14/94\n34\n6\n17.65\n2\n2.06\n5\n4.85\n06/15/94\n97\n64","Appendix Table 13.\nContinued.\nDaily\nTotal\nMeasured\nsample\nExpected\nnumber\nTotal in\nsample\nvalue\ndetected\nsample\nDate\nrate\nrate\n3.40\n06/16/94\n68\n2\n2.94\n5\n2.10\n5\n06/17/94\n42\n0\n0.00\n06/18/94\n33\n2\n6.06\n5\n1.65\n1.25\n06/19/94\n25\n3\n12.00\n5\n2.17\n06/21/94\n13\n3\n23.08\n16.67\n06/22/94\n11\n3\n27.27\n16.67\n1.84\n16.67\n2.00\n06/23/94\n12\n2\n16.67\n4.17\n06/24/94\n25\n1\n4.00\n16.67\nLarge-fish flume:\n3.70\n04/17/94\n185\n4\n2.16\n2\n04/29/94\n36\n1\n2.78\n5\n1.80\n04/30/94\n64\n3\n4.69\n5\n3.20\n5\n7.80\n05/01/94\n156\n10\n6.41\n05/02/94\n355\n15\n4.23\n5\n17.75\n05/03/94\n453\n14\n3.09\n5\n22.65\n05/04/94\n508\n8\n1.57\n3\n15.24\n05/05/94\n678\n13\n1.92\n2\n13.56\n05/06/94\n621\n9\n1.45\n2\n12.42\n05/07/94\n625\n6\n0.96\n2\n12.50\n05/08/94\n855\n20\n2.34\n2\n17.10\n05/09/94\n948\n18\n1.90\n2\n18.96\n05/10/94\n1177\n25\n2.12\n2\n23.54\n05/11/94\n1632\n23\n1.41\n2\n32.64\n05/12/94\n1323\n23\n1.74\n2\n26.46\n05/13/94\n1507\n20\n1.33\n2\n30.14\n1.84\n05/14/94\n1306\n24\n2\n26.12\n05/15/94\n1123\n21\n1.87\n2\n22.46\n05/16/94\n1195\n17\n1.42\n2\n23.90\n47.44\n05/17/94\n2372\n48\n2.02\n2\n05/18/94\n2368\n49\n2.07\n2\n47.36\n05/19/94\n1087\n23\n2.12\n2\n21.74\n30.34\n05/22/94\n1517\n19\n1.25\n2\n05/23/94\n1624\n26\n1.60\n2\n32.48\n05/24/94\n1904\n34\n1.79\n2\n38.08\n1.35\n05/25/94\n1478\n20\n2\n29.56\n05/26/94\n678\n8\n1.18\n2\n13.56\n05/27/94\n1191\n24\n2.02\n2\n23.82\n05/28/94\n424\n3\n0.71\n2\n8.48\n05/31/94\n515\n19\n3.69\n2\n10.30\n06/01/94\n535\n17\n3.18\n3\n16.05\n06/02/94\n442\n12\n2.71\n3\n13.26\n06/03/94\n434\n11\n2.53\n4\n17.36\n06/04/94\n283\n7\n2.47\n4\n11.32\n6.44\n06/05/94\n161\n6\n3.73\n4\n06/06/94\n213\n6\n2.82\n4\n8.52\n65","Appendix Table 13.\nContinued.\nTotal\nMeasured\nDaily\nExpected\nnumber\nTotal in\nsample\nsample\nvalue\nDate\ndetected\nsample\nrate\nrate\n06/07/94\n118\n1\n0.85\n4\n4.72\n06/09/94\n253\n8\n3.16\n4\n10.12\n06/10/94\n141\n4\n2.84\n4\n5.64\n2.78\n06/11/94\n108\n3\n4\n4.32\n06/12/94\n91\n3\n3.30\n5\n4.55\n06/13/94\n98\n10\n10.20\n5\n4.90\n06/14/94\n63\n2\n3.17\n5\n3.15\n06/15/94\n112\n5\n4.46\n5\n5.60\n2.50\n06/16/94\n50\n4\n8.00\n5\n5\n3.75\n06/17/94\n75\n5\n6.67\n06/18/94\n87\n6\n6.90\n5\n4.35\n06/19/94\n66\n3\n4.55\n5\n3.30\n5\n8.85\n06/20/94\n177\n8\n4.52\n06/21/94\n144\n5\n3.47\n5\n7.20\n06/22/94\n107\n7\n6.54\n5\n5.35\n3.50\n06/23/94\n70\n1\n1.43\n5\n06/24/94\n63\n1\n1.59\n5\n3.15\n06/25/94\n62\n1\n1.61\n5\n3.10\n06/26/94\n42\n0\n0.00\n3\n1.26\n06/28/94\n58\n1\n1.72\n3\n1.74\n06/29/94\n46\n1\n2.17\n3\n1.38\n06/30/94\n34\n0\n0.00\n3\n1.02\n66"]}