Details:

Journal Title:
PLOS ONE
Personal Author:
Gaichas, Sarah K. ; DePiper, Geret S. ; Seagraves, Richard J. ; Muffley, Brandon W. ; Sabo, Mary G. ; ... More +
Gaichas, Sarah K. ; DePiper, Geret S. ; Seagraves, Richard J. ; Muffley, Brandon W. ; Sabo, Mary G. ; Colburn, Lisa L. ; Loftus, Andrew J. Less -
NOAA Program & Office:
NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) ; NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center) ; Integrated Ecosystem Assessment
NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) ; NEFSC (Northeast Fisheries Science Center) ; Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Less -
Description:
Fishery managers worldwide are evaluating methods for incorporating climate, habitat, ecological, social, and economic factors into current operations in order to implement Ecosystem Approaches to Fishery Management (EAFM). While this can seem overwhelming, it is possible to take practical steps toward EAFM implementation that make use of existing information and provide managers with valuable strategic advice. Here, we describe the process used by the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) to develop an ecosystem-level risk assessment, the initial step proposed in their recently adopted EAFM guidance document. The Council first defined five types of Risk Elements (ecological, economic, social, food production, management) and identified which management objectives aligned with each element. Based on an existing ecosystem status report for the region and other existing sources (including expert opinion), potential ecological, social, economic, and management indicators were identified for each risk element. Finally, low, low-moderate, moderate-high, and high risk criteria were defined for each indicator, and the indicator data were used to score each risk element using the criteria. The ultimate outcome is a ranked risk assessment in order to focus on the highest risk issues for further evaluation and mitigation. The risk assessment highlights certain species and certain management issues as posing higher cumulative risks to meeting Council management objectives when considering a broad range of ecological, social, and economic factors. Tabular color coded summaries of risk assessment results will be used by the Council to prioritize further EAFM analyses as well as research plans over the coming 5 years. As ecosystem reporting and operational EAFM continue to evolve in future years, the Council foresees integrating these efforts so that ecosystem indicators are refined to meet the needs of fishery managers in identifying and managing risks to achieving ecological, social, and economic fishery objectives. Overall, ecosystem indicator-based risk assessment is a method that can be adapted to a wide range of resource management systems and available information, and therefore represents a promising way forward in the implementation of EAFM.
Source:
Frontiers in Marine Science, 5, Unsp 442.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00442
Document Type:
Journal Article
Rights Information:
CC BY
Compliance:
Submitted
Main Document Checksum:
[+]
urn:sha256:90655824d21f67d9d46a03e5de55f20a8561510849b24c90860dfc1636e0b8de
Download URL:
https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/21020/noaa_21020_DS1.pdf
File Type:

Supporting Files

• No Additional Files

More +